Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Injury Severity and Total Harm in Truck-Involved Work Zone Crashes

Abstract

Society pays a high cost for work zone crashes in terms of operational disruptions, property damage, injuries, and loss of life. Given narrow lanes in work zones, large trucks are of particular concern. Truck-involved collisions in work zones, as opposed to non-truck-involved collisions in North Carolina, are empirically examined. This examination helps in understanding which work zone attributes are empirically associated with the most seriously injured occupant and total harm in a crash. Specifically, with a unique data set, effects of the following variables were explored: type of work zone, presence of warning signs and cones, type of activity in the work zone, location of the crash in the work zone, and construction impact of the work zone on the roadway. The results show that work zone crashes in North Carolina, especially those involving large trucks, were more injurious than were non—work zone crashes. Rigorous modeling results suggest that truck-involved multivehicle crashes were most injurious and harmful when (a) they occurred on two-way undivided or two-way divided but unprotected (without a median barrier) roadways; (b) the roadway was closed and a detour was required on the opposite side; (c) they occurred adjacent to the work area; and (d) the posted speed limits were higher. The results provide valuable information on high-risk factors in work zones.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kite S. SMART Work Zones: Technology for Work Zone Management. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, 2003.
2. 2000 Work Zone Traffic Crash Facts. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, March 2002.
3. Elvik R. A Meta-Analysis of Value of Life Estimates for Occupational and Transport Safety. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1995.
4. Blincoe L. J. The Economic Costs of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 1994. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.
5. de Blaeij A., Florax R. J. G. M., Rietveld P., and Verhoef E. The Value of Statistical Life in Road Safety: A Meta-Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2003, pp. 973–986.
6. Hargroves B., and Martin M. Vehicle Accidents in Highway Work Zones: Final Report. Report FHWA-RD-80-063. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1980.
7. Stammer R. Highway Safety: At the Crossroads. In Proc., ASCE Specialty Conference, Highway Safety: At the Crossroads, San Antonio, Tex., 1988.
8. Wang J., Hughes W. E., Council F. M., and Paniati J. F. Investigation of Highway Work Zone Crashes: What We Know and What We Don't Know. In Transportation Research Record 1529, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 54–62.
9. Juergens W. R. Construction Zone, Detour and Temporary Connection Accidents. Business and Transportation Agency, California Division of Highways, Sacramento, 1972.
10. Liste F., Bernard R., and Melvin B. Evaluation of Timber Barricades and Precast Concrete Traffic Barriers for Use in Highway Construction Areas. Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1976.
11. Graham J., Paulsen R., and Glennon J. Accident and Speed Studies in Construction Zones. Report FHWA-RD-77-80. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1977.
12. Nemeth Z. A., and Migletz D. J. Accident Characteristics Before, During, and After Safety Upgrading Projects on Ohio's Rural Interstate System. In Transportation Research Record 672, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 19–24.
13. Rouphail N. M., Yang Z. S., and Fazio J. Comparative Study of Shortand Long-Term Urban Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1163, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 4–14.
14. Hall J. W., and Lorenz V. M. Characteristics of Construction-Zone Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1230, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 20–27.
15. Garber N. J., and Woo T. H. Accident Characteristics at Construction and Maintenance Zones in Urban Areas. VTRC 90-R12. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1990.
16. Hargroves B. T. Vehicle Accidents in Highway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 107, No. TE5, 1981, pp. 525–539.
17. Nemeth Z. A., and Rathi A. Freeway Work Zone Accident Characteristics. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1983, pp. 145–159.
18. Ha T., and Nemeth Z. Detailed Study of Accident Experience in Construction and Maintenance Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1509, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 38–45.
19. Pigman J. G., and Agent K. R. Highway Accidents in Construction and Maintenance Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1270, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 12–21.
20. Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety. Summary Report on Work Zone Accidents. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1987.
21. Khattak A., Khattak A., and Council F. M. Effects of Work Zone Presence on Injury and Non-Injury Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 19–29.
22. Garber N. J., and Zhao M. Distribution and Characteristics of Crashes at Different Work Zone Locations in Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1794, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 19–25.
23. Daniel J., Dixon K., and Jared D. Analysis of Fatal Crashes in Georgia Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1715, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 18–23.
24. Chambless J., Ghadiali A. M., Lindly J. K., and McFadden J. Multistate Work Zone Crash Characteristics. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, Vol. 72, No. 5, 2002, pp. 46–50.
25. O'Donnell C., and Connor D. Predicting the Severity of Motor Vehicle Accident Injuries Using Models of Ordered Multiple Choice. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1996, pp. 739–753.
26. Duncan C. S., Khattak A. J., and Council F. M. Applying the Ordered Probit Model to Injury Severity in Truck—Passenger Car Rear-End Collisions. In Transportation Research Record 1635, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 63–71.
27. Hagle T., and Mitchell G. Goodness of Fit Measures for Probit and Logit. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 762–784.
28. Windmeijer F. A. G. Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Binary Choice Models. Econometric Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1995 pp. 101–116.
29. Miller T., and Spicer R. Children's Safety Network Economics and Insurance Resource Center. PIRE, Calverton, Md., 2001. Accessed Feb. 25, 2004. www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/about.asp
30. Kennedy P. E. Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations. The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1981, p. 801.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Asad J. Khattak
Carolina Transportation Program, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, CB 3140 New East Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Felipe Targa
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, 1173 Glenn Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 172

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 58

  1. Crash Contributing Factors and Patterns Associated with Fatal Truck-In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Examination of Crash Rates and Injury Severity Before, During, and Aft...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Analysis Framework to Assess Crash Severity for Large Trucks on Rural ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Severity modeling of work zone crashes in New Jersey using machine lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of Injury Severity of Work Zone Truck-Involved Crashes in Sou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Crash harm before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for spati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Modelling Road Work Zone Crashes’ Nature and Type of Person Involved U...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analysis of Temporal Stability of Contributing Factors to Truck-Involv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Injury Severity Analysis for Large Truck-Involved Crashes: Accounting ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. An empirical analysis of driver injury severities in work-zone and non...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Exploring factors associated with crash severity on motorways in Pakis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Analyzing injury severity of rear-end crashes involving large trucks u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Safety Impact of Connected Vehicles on Driver Behavior in Rural Work Z...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. An application of in-vehicle recording technologies to analyze injury ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Injury severity of truck-involved crashes in work zones on rural and u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Analysis of Fatal Truck-Involved Work Zone Crashes in Florida: Applica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Assessment of commercial truck driver injury severity based on truck c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Recursive Bivariate Probit Analysis of Injury Severity and Non-Truck I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Severity of emergency natural gas distribution pipeline incidents: App...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Summary of crash-frequency and crash-severity models in highway safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Determination of the types of road accidents at roundabouts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Enhancing Construction Truck Safety at Work Zones: A Microscopic Traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The relationship between driving volatility in time to collision and c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Exploration of Hazardous Material Truck Crashes on Wyoming’s Interstat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Severity of Worker-Involved Work Zone Crashes: A Study of Contributing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Does time of day matter at highway work zone crashes?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Comparing Factors Affecting Injury Severity of Passenger Car and Truck...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. A Random Parameters Ordered Probit Analysis of Injury Severity in Truc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Exploring factors contributing to injury severity at work zones consid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Injury Severity and Contributing Driver Actions in Passenger Vehicle–T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Identifying Fatality Risk Factors for the Commercial Vehicle Driver Po...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Impacts of Work Zone Component Areas on Driver Injury Severity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Investigating Factors Contributing to Injury Severity in Work Zone Rea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Identifying the Factors Contributing to Injury Severity in Work Zone R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Analysis of Work-Zone Crashes Using the Ordered Probit Model with Fact...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Injury severity analysis of commercially-licensed drivers in single-ve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Injury severity analysis in taxi-pedestrian crashes: An application of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Analysis of passenger-car crash injury severity in different work zone...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Contributory fault and level of personal injury to drivers involved in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Analysis of injury severity of large truck crashes in work zones
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Work zones versus nonwork zones: Risk factors leading to rear-end and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Examining the factors affecting the severity of run-off-road crashes i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. What Role Do Precrash Driver Actions Play in Work Zone Crashes?:Applic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Identifying Crash Patterns on Roundabouts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Common hazards and their mitigating measures in work zones: A qualitat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Crash Patterns at Signalized Intersections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Measure Severity of Single-Vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Drivers’ Smart Assistance System Based on Radio Frequency Identificati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Injury severity in delivery-motorcycle to vehicle crashes in the Seoul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and fut...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Modeling safety of highway work zones with random parameters and rando...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Operational Assessment of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Safety Evaluation of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Analysis of Crash Frequency in Work Zones with Focus on Police Enforce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: A review ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Pedestrian injury analysis with consideration of the selectivity bias ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Model-Based Application of Abbreviated Injury Scale to Police-Reported...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Crash Injury Severity Analysis Using Bayesian Ordered Probit Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub