Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Creative Solutions for Assessing Level of Service Equally Across Modes

Abstract

Transportation professionals base the level of service (LOS) for automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes on various criteria, and therefore the LOS is calculated differently for each mode. The current classification schemes make total transportation performance and multimodal trade-off decisions difficult to assess, and the measures do not reflect expectations. The primary objective of this Florida Department of Transportation research project was to identify new approaches for developing an LOS system that planners can use to assess automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes of travel equally. Aided by a systematic creative thinking approach, an expert panel identified the perceived values, the feasibility, and the benefits of each alternative approach. The panel also identified the difficulties and cautions associated with each of the alternatives. Furthermore, the expert panel concluded that the fundamental need in developing a method to assess LOS equally across modes would be to correlate the levels for each mode with user perceptions. On the basis of group discussions and in consideration of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the panel postulated that a hierarchy of transportation user needs would consist of five levels: safety and security (the most basic need), time, societal acceptance, cost, and comfort and convenience (the highest need). The next task in developing a method to assess LOS equally across modes should be the scientific evaluation of the hypothesis of a transportation user hierarchy of needs to determine its validity and effectiveness.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2000.
2. Winters P. L., Cleland F., Mierzejewski E., and Tucker L. Assessing Level of Service Equally Across Modes. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa; Florida Department of Transportation, Tampa, 2001.
3. Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. Assessing Level of Service Equally Across Modes. Systems Planning Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tampa, 2001.
4. De Bono E. Six Thinking Hats: Tools for Parallel Thinking. Little, Brown, Boston, 1999.
5. De Bono E. Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. Perennial Library, New York, 1970, 1990.
6. Landis B. W., Vattikuti V. R., Ottenberg R. M., McLeod D. S., and Guttenplan M. Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2001, pp. 82–88.
7. Maslow A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol. 50, 1943, pp. 370–396.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Philip L. Winters
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100, Tampa, FL 33620-5375
Lisa E. Tucker
Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100, Tampa, FL 33620-5375

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 32

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Bicycle Facilities Safest from Crime and Crashes: Perceptions of Resid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Cycle Tracks and Parking Environments in China: Learning from College ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Complete Enough for Complete Streets?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. More Comfort, Shorter Travel Time, or Low Fares?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub