Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Issues Related to Federal Funding of Bus Rapid Transit

Abstract

Bus rapid transit (BRT) has emerged as a frequent option in the development of the long-range transit plans for urban areas in the United States. This has come about because of the growing number of BRT success stories in the United States and around the world, because of a desire to consider lower-cost investment options at a time of limited resources, and because of encouragement from FTA. The key to the success of BRT is its potential to increase transit service quality and ridership meaningfully at an affordable price. As the BRT concept is evolving, issues in regard to federal funding for BRT investments are critical to localities considering BRT investments. Not surprisingly, there is a growing interest in how best to fund BRT and specifically how best to position BRT with respect to existing federal funding programs and programming processes. A review was conducted of the background context on BRT including the definition and cost history of BRT. There is also a discussion of the current and possible future eligibility for existing and proposed funding programs at the federal level. Three alternative strategies were considered: eliminating the fixed-guideway restrictions of the New Starts Program without turning it into a conventional bus program, expanding the funds available enough under the Bus Capital Program to fund BRT with incentives to encourage true BRT projects, and creating an entirely new BRT funding program. The conclusion addresses issues to be considered as BRT federal funding eligibility is determined.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. BRT Website Home Page FTA. www.fta.dot.gov/brt/index.html
2. Bus Rapid Transit Shows Promise. GAO-01-984. General Accounting Office, Sept. 2001.
3. Frequently Asked Questions on the New Starts Final Rule: An Interim Guidance Addressing the Major Capital Investment Projects Final Rule. Office of Planning, FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 2001.
4. Challenges in Evaluating, Overseeing, and Funding Major Transit Projects. GAO/T-RCED-00-104. General Accounting Office, March 8, 2000.
5. U.S. House of Representatives, 107th Congress, Conference Report to Accompany H.B. 2299. Report 107-308. Nov. 30, 2001.
6. President Bush Releases Details on 2002 Budget. Legislative Staff, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Washington, D.C., April 2001.
7. Puentes R. Flexible Funding for Transit: Who Uses It? Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., May 2000.
8. Miller M. A., and Buckley S. M. Institutional Aspects of Bus Rapid Transit Operation. California PATH Research Report. UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-9. University of California, Berkeley, April 2001.
9. Annual Report on New Starts—Proposed Allocations of Funds for Fiscal Year 2003. Report Number FTA-TBP10-2002-01. Federal Transit Administration, 2002.
10. FTA Fiscal Year 1998 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice. Federal Register, Dec. 5, 1997.
11. FTA Fiscal Year 1999 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice of Correction. Federal Register, Nov. 6, 1998.
12. FTA Fiscal Year 2000 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice of Changes and Correction. Federal Register, Oct. 28, 1999 (revised Dec. 16, 1999).
13. FTA Fiscal Year 2001 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice of Changes and Correction. Federal Register, Jan. 18, 2001.
14. FTA Fiscal Year 2002 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice of Changes and Correction. Federal Register, Jan. 2, 2002.
15. FTA Fiscal Year 2002 Apportionments, Allocations and Program Information; Notice of Changes and Correction. Federal Register, March 12, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William G. Barker
National Bus Rapid Transit Institute, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5375
Gary Brosch
National Bus Rapid Transit Institute, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5375
Steven E. Polzin
National Bus Rapid Transit Institute, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5375

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Infrastructural excess: the branding and securing of bus rapid transit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Apples to apples: Comparing BRT and light rail while avoiding the “BRT...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Light Rail Lite or Cost-Effective Improvements to Bus Service?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub