Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Policy Support for and Barriers to Transit-Oriented Development in the Inner City: Literature Review

Daniel Baldwin Hess and Peter A. LombardiView all authors and affiliations
Volume 1887, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.3141/1887-04

Abstract

The promise of transit-oriented development (TOD) for increasing transit ridership, enhancing economic development, and establishing a "sense of place" at transportation nodes has been well documented in the literature. However, the majority of research addresses TOD in greenfield sites located primarily in suburban places in growing regions. The policies that are widely believed to be supportive of TOD are examined, the gap in knowledge about TOD in established city neighborhoods is addressed, and the challenges of TOD in different urban settings are compared. Findings reveal that (a) the literature appears to be consistent and confident in outlining the public policies that encourage TOD; (b) researchers tend to focus on TODs in suburban and greenfield areas of fast-growing regions in the western and southern United States; (c) TODs in older cities are not well publicized and are largely ignored by the literature; and (d) researchers who study inner-city TOD usually focus on the lack of it, or any type of development, in economically depressed areas. The conclusion of several researchers that a strong local economy is key to successful TOD offers a clue as to why recently built TOD is largely absent from many older, slow-growth cities like Buffalo, New York, and St. Louis, Missouri. It also offers some insight into why the TOD trend is strongest in high-growth metropolitan areas like San Diego, California, and why it seems to skip struggling neighborhoods within them, like South Central Los Angeles, California. Although pre-1950s TOD is common in older cities, that ubiquity appears to reduce the publicity and attention given to more recent TOD in those places.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Kain J. Choosing the Wrong Technology: Or How to Spend Billions and Reduce Transit Use. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 21, 1988, pp. 197–213.
Crossref
Google Scholar
2. Pickrell D. A Desire Named Streetcar: Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1992, pp. 158–176.
Crossref
Google Scholar
3. Porter D. TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 20: Transit Focused Development. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.
Google Scholar
4. Porter D. Transit-Focused Development and Light-Rail Systems: The Lite Connection. In Transportation Research Record 1623, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 165–169.
Crossref
Google Scholar
5. Lowe M. Shaping Cities. In State of the World (Lester Brown, ed.), Norton, New York, 1992, Chapter 8.
Google Scholar
6. Cudahy B. Cash, Tokens, and Transfers: A History of Urban Mass Transit in North America. Fordham University Press, New York, 2001.
Google Scholar
7. Warner S. Streetcar Suburbs: The Process of Growth in Boston, 1870-1900. Atheneum, New York, 1962.
Google Scholar
8. Calthorpe P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, N.J., 1993.
Google Scholar
9. Audirac I. Stated Preference for Pedestrian Proximity: An Assessment of New Urbanist Sense of Community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1999, pp. 53–66.
Crossref
Google Scholar
10. Bernick M., and Cervero R. Transit Villages for the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill, New Yorke, 1997.
Google Scholar
11. Bernick M. Transit Villages: Tools for Revitalizing the Inner City. Access, Vol. 9, 1996, pp. 13–17.
Google Scholar
12. Cervero R. The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1998.
Google Scholar
13. Cervero R., and Bernick M. Transit-Centered Urban Villages. In Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design (Watson D., Plattus A., and Shibley R., eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003, pp. 5.8-1-5.8–10.
Google Scholar
14. Belzer D., and Autler G. Countering Sprawl with Transit-Oriented Development. Issues in Science and Technology Online, Fall 2002. www.nap.edu/issues/19.1/belzer.htm.
Google Scholar
15. Cervero R., Hall P., and Landis J. Transit Joint Development in the United States. Monograph 42. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1992.
Google Scholar
16. Cervero R., Ferrell C., and Murphy S. TCRP Research Results Digest 52: Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States—A Literature Review. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.
Google Scholar
17. Joint Development Program. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, Calif., no date. www.mta.net/trans_planning/CPD/joint_development/images/program_update.pdf.
Google Scholar
18. Arrington G. B., and Parker T. Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2001.
Google Scholar
19. Newman P., and Kenworthy J. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1998.
Google Scholar
20. Boarnet M., and Compin N. Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego County: The Incremental Implementation of a Planning Idea. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1999, pp. 80–95.
Crossref
Google Scholar
21. Giuliano G. The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection. Access, No. 6, 1995, pp. 3–11.
Google Scholar
22. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
Crossref
Google Scholar
23. Bae C. Orenco Station, Portland, Oregon: A Successful Transit Oriented Development Experiment? Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2002, pp. 9–18.
Google Scholar
24. Cervero R., and Duncan M. Transit's Value-Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 8–15.
Crossref
Google Scholar
25. Cervero R., and Duncan M. Benefits of Proximity to Rail on Housing Markets. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1–18.
Crossref
Google Scholar
26. Dittmar H., and Ohland G. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
Google Scholar
27. Bragado N. S. Transit Joint Development in San Diego: Policies and Practices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1669, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 22–29.
Crossref
Google Scholar
28. Cervero R. Transit Villages in California: Progress, Prospects, and Policy Reforms. Working Paper 98-08. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.
Google Scholar
29. Nelson D., Niles J., and Hibshoosh A. A New Planning Template for Transit-Oriented Development. MTI Report 01-12. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2001.
Google Scholar
30. Babsin M., Hill M., Melendy L., O'Neill M. and Deakin E. Real Estate Trends and Transit Oriented Development: A Compendium for 21 Metro Regions. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1997.
Google Scholar
31. White S. M., and McDaniel J. TCRP Legal Research Digest 12: The Zoning and Real Estate Implications of Transit-Oriented Development. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1–50.
Google Scholar
32. Meck S. (ed.). Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change. American Planning Association, Chicago, Ill., 2002.
Google Scholar
33. Renne J., and Newman P. Ideas in Motion: Facilitating the Financing and Development of “Smart Growth.” Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2002, pp. 23–32.
Google Scholar
34. Lefaver S., Buys B., Castillo D., Mattoon S., and Vargo J. Construction of Transit-Based Development. MTI Report 01-05. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2001.
Google Scholar
35. Duffy J. Transit-Oriented Development in Atlanta. Mass Transit, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2002, pp. 20–23.
Google Scholar
36. Office of Property Development & Management. WMATA Joint Development Policies and Guidelines. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C., 2002.
Google Scholar
37. Chambers R., and Pendered D. Transit-Developer Deal a First. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, Jan. 27, 1999, p. D5.
Google Scholar
38. Niles J., and Nelson D. Measuring Success of Transit-Oriented Development: Retail Market Dynamics and Other Key Determinants. Presented at the American Planning Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, Wash., April 1999.
Google Scholar
39. Calthorpe P., and Fulton W. Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.
Google Scholar
40. Belzer D., and Autler G. Transit-Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Discussion Paper. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, D.C., and Great American Station Foundation, Santa Fe, N. Mex., June 2002.
Google Scholar
41. Dunphy R., Myerson D., and Pawlukiewicz M. Ten Principles for Successful Development Around Transit. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Google Scholar
42. Ohland G. The Unlikely Success of DART and TOD in Dallas. Progress: Surface Transportation Policy Project, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2002, pp. 6–7.
Google Scholar
43. Price Waterhouse Cooper and Lendlease. Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2001. www.lendlease.com
Google Scholar
44. Leach D. Transit-Oriented Development in Arlington County, Virginia: Thirty Years of Results. Presented at the Congress for New Urbanism XI, Washington, D.C., June 2003.
Google Scholar
45. Ohland G. Transit-Oriented Development in Four Cities. Working Paper. Great American Station Foundation, Santa Fe, N. Mex., 2001.
Google Scholar
46. Bagli C. Bloomberg Is Expected to Close a Deal on Alexander’s Site. New York Times, April 27, 2001, p. B8.
Google Scholar
47. Brady T. Enterprise Center Reveals Plan for $75 Million Expansion. Philadelphia Inquirer, July 17, 2002.
Google Scholar
48. Smallridge H., Kindsvatter D., and Moran S. Boston: A Model for Fostering Transit-Oriented Growth in Dense, Older Cities. In Proc., Commuter Rail/Transit Conference, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., 2002.
Google Scholar
49. Polzin S., and Baltes M. Bus Rapid Transit: A Viable Alternative? Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 47–70.
Crossref
Google Scholar
50. Mass Transit: Bus Rapid Transit Shows Promise. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO-01-984. U.S. Government Accounting Office, Sept. 2001.
Google Scholar
51. Raine A. Waterfront TOD. Urban Land, May 2003, pp. 79–83.
Google Scholar
52. Levinson H., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., and Rutherford S. Bus Rapid Transit: An Overview. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 1–30.
Crossref
Google Scholar
53. Levinson H., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., Rutherford S., Smith R. L., Cracknell J., and Soberman R. TCRP Report No. 90: Bus Rapid Transit. Volume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Crossref
Google Scholar
54. Loukaitou-Sideris A. Transit-Oriented Development in the Inner City: A Delphi Survey. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2000, pp. 75–98.
Crossref
Google Scholar
55. Loukaitou-Sideris A., and Banerjee T. There's No There There. Access, Vol. 9, 1996, pp. 2–6.
Google Scholar
56. Loukaitou-Sideris A., and Banerjee T. The Blue Line Blues: Why the Vision of Transit Village May Not Materialize Despite Impressive Growth in Ridership. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2000, pp. 101–125.
Crossref
Google Scholar
57. Deakin E., Ferrell C., Mason J., and Thomas J. Policies and Practices for Cost-Effective Transit Investments: Recent Experiences in the United States. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1799, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 1–9.
Crossref
Google Scholar
58. Charter and Ordinances of the City of Buffalo. City of Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y., 1993.
Google Scholar
59. Fairbanks P. City Advances Major Project in LaSalle Area, Three Options Include Business Park, Housing. Buffalo News, Nov. 21, 1994, p. A1.
Google Scholar
60. Herre S. 2003. Integration of Transit and Land Use: A Study of Los Angeles Rail Transit Stations. Master's thesis. University of California, Los Angeles, 2003.
Google Scholar
61. Palmer T. Jr., Pier 4 Plan Advances, 3 Towers Tentatively OK'd; Transportation Issues Cited. Boston Globe, Aug. 31, 2002, p. D1.
Google Scholar
62. California Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Searchable Database. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2000. transitorienteddevelopment.dot.ca.gov.
Google Scholar
63. MARTA Cuts Ribbon at Lindbergh City Center. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., Nov. 2002. www.apta.com/passenger_transport/thisweek/02novemberarch.cfm
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 1887, Issue 1
Pages: 26 - 33
Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel Baldwin Hess
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 3435 Main Street, 116 Hayes Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214-3087
View all articles by this author
Peter A. Lombardi
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 3435 Main Street, 116 Hayes Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214-3087
View all articles by this author

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 640

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 53

  1. Location of transit-oriented development stations based on multimodal ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Review of planning, land use, and zoning barriers to the construction ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Transit-Oriented Development and Suburban Gentrification: A “Natural R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Transit-Oriented Development and Sustainable Cities: A Visual Analysis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Zone-based TOD evaluation considering interdependences among criteria ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The Conceptual Framework of Smart TOD: An Integration of Smart City an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Transit-Oriented Development in Planning History
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The travel, equity and wellbeing impacts of transit-oriented developme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Transit-oriented development in developing countries: A qualitative me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Scientometric Analysis and Mapping of Transit-Oriented Development Stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Transit oriented development: A bibliometric analysis of research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Transit-oriented development with urban sprawl? Four phases of urban g...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Who lives in transit-friendly neighborhoods? An analysis of California...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. What the newcomers to transit-oriented development are confronted with...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. The Social Justice Impact of the Transit-Oriented Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Transit-Oriented Development: Exploring Citizen Perceptions in a Boomi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Transit-induced gentrification and displacement: The state of the deba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. 10 Questions to Ask About Planning, Financing and Implementing Transit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Role of Bikeshare Programs in Transit-Oriented Development: Case of Bi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Effect of densification and compactness on urban building energy consu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Transport's historical, contemporary and future role in shaping urban ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Adi Sumarmo airport train station: Transit and connectivity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Assessing Transit-Oriented Development Implementation in Canadian Citi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Mi Casa no es Su Casa: The Fight for Equitable Transit-Oriented Develo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A Twenty-Five-Year Biography of the TOD Concept: From Design to Policy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. A systematic review of the dimensions of transit-oriented urban planni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Les projets novateurs de Transit-oriented development dans le Grand Mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Planning Strategy for Green Transit Oriented Development Using A Multi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Transit-oriented development on greenfield versus infill sites: Some l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Repealing minimum parking requirements in Buffalo: new directions for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Anticipation and post-construction impact of a metro extension on resi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Contested spaces and subjectivities of transit: Political ecology of a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Developers' perspectives on transit-oriented development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Urban rail investment and transit-oriented development in Beijing: Can...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Le TOD comme instrument territorial de la coordination entre urbanisme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Positive and Negative Factors for Transit Oriented Development: Case S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Streetcars and Recovery...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Living it up in the ‘new world city’: high-rise development and the pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Planning, place-making and building consensus for transit-oriented dev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Putting Schools on the Map...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The Interaction between Land Use and Transport Planning: A Methodologi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Study on Layout Strategy of Transit Hub Network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. The economic value of walkable neighborhoods
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Walking to the bus: perceived versus actual walking distance to bus st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Sustainable Urban Regeneration and the Tod Development Model: Lessons ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. The Residents’ Benefits and Concerns Before and After a New Rail Stop...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Transit-Oriented Development at the Urban Periphery...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Comparing the Capitalisation Benefits of Light-rail Transit and Overla...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  51. The Mega-Project as Crux of Integrated Planning: Insights from Munich'...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Compact Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Before and After a New Light Rail Stop: Resident Attitudes, Travel Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage