Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Methodology to Evaluate the Flail Space Model by Using Event Data Recorder Technology

Abstract

The flail space model, which was developed in the 1980s, has become the standard method for estimating occupant risk in full-scale crash tests involving roadside safety features. The widespread availability of air bags and increased seat belt usage rates in today's vehicle fleet, however, raise serious questions concerning the validity of the model. Recent installation of event data recorders (EDRs) in a number of late-model vehicles presents a different perspective on the assessment of the validity of occupant risk based on the flail space model. EDRs are capable of electronically recording data such as vehicle speed, brake status, and throttle position just before and during an accident. Of particular interest is the EDR's ability to document the deceleration of a vehicle during a collision event. A methodology using EDR data to investigate the capability of the flail space model to predict injury to air bag-restrained occupants and results of a preliminary analysis based on implementation of the developed methodology on a limited data set are presented. Most of the analysis is limited to the occupant impact velocity because of insufficient data for evaluation of the occupant ridedown acceleration. The longitudinal occupant impact velocity was found to be a good predictor of overall injury, chest injury, and, to a lesser extent, lower extremity injury. For the head and upper extremity body region, the longitudinal occupant impact velocity is a weak predictor of injury.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bronstad M. E., and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 153: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1974.
2. Transportation Research Circular 191: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1978.
3. Michie J. D. Collision Risk Assessment Based on Occupant Flail-Space Model. In Transportation Research Record 796, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1981, pp. 1–9.
4. Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1981.
5. Ross H. E. Jr., Sicking D. L., Zimmer R. A. and Michie J. D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1993.
6. Kay S. E., Pickard J., and Patrick L. M. Improved Laminated Windshield with Reduced Laceration Properties. Proc., 17th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Paper 730969, 1973.
7. Begeman P., King A., Weigt P., and Patrick L. M. Safety Performance of Asymmetric Windshields. Paper 791009. SAE, New York, 1978.
8. Hartman F., Thomas C., Foret-Bruno J., Henry C., Fayon A., and Tarriere C. Occupant Protection in Lateral Impacts. Proc., 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1976.
9. NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Side Impact Protection. 49 C.F.R., Part 571.214.
10. Chi M. Assessment of Injury Criteria in Roadside Barrier Tests. Report FHWA-RD-75-74. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1976.
11. Snyder R. G. State-of-the-Art—Human Impact Tolerances. SAE 700398. International Automobile Safety Conference Compendium, May 1970.
12. Viano D. C., and Lau I. V. Biomechanics of Impact Injury. Research Publication GMR-6894. General Motors Research Laboratories, Dec. 1989.
13. Ray M. H., Michie J. D., Hunter W., and Stutts J. Evaluation of Design Analysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Roadside Hardware, Volume 4: The Importance of the Occupant Risk Criteria. FHWA RD-87/099. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1987.
14. Hinch J., Sawyer D., Stout D., Hargrave M., and Owings R. Impact Attenuators: A Current Engineering Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record 1198, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1988, pp. 76–89.
15. Council F. M., and Stewart J. R. Attempt to Define Relationship Between Forces to Crash-Test Vehicles and Occupant Injury in Similar Real-World Crashes. In Transportation Research Record 1419, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1993, pp. 78–85.
16. Ray M. H., Michie J. D., and Hargrave M. Events That Produce Occupant Injury in Longitudinal Barrier Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1065, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1986, pp. 19–31.
17. Ray M. H., Michie J. D., and Calcote L. R. Evaluation of Design Analysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Roadside Hardware, Volume 3: Evaluating Pre-Report 230 Crash Tests. FHWA RD-87/098. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1987.
18. Ross H. E. Jr., Perera H. S., Sicking D. L., and Bligh R. P. NCHRP Report 318: Roadside Safety Design for Small Vehicles. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1989.
19. Ray M. H., and Carney J. F. III. Improved Method for Determining Vehicle and Occupant Kinematics in Full-Scale Crash Tests. In Transportation Research Record 1233, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1989, pp. 132–144.
20. Transportation Research Circular 451: International Crash Test Standards for Roadside Safety Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1995.
21. Event Data Recorders—Summary of Findings by the NHTSA EDR Working Group. Final Report. NHTSA, Aug. 2001.
22. Gabler H. C., Hampton C., and Roston T. Estimating Crash Severity: Can Event Data Recorders Replace Crash Reconstruction? Proc., 18th International Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper 490, Nagoya, Japan, May 2003.
23. Chidester A., Hinch J., Mercer T., and Schultz K. Recording Automotive Crash Event Data. Proc., International Symposium on Transportation Recorders, Arlington, Va., May 1999.
24. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision, Update 98. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
25. Correia J. T., Iliadis K. A., McCarron E. S., and Smole M. A. Utilizing Data from Automotive Event Data Recorders. Proc., 12th Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference, London, Ontario, Canada, June 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Douglas Gabauer
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701
Hampton C. Gabler
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 30

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Comparison of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics for Predicting Occu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Numerical investigation of occupant injury risks in car-to-end termina...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Review of flail-space's lateral impact velocity criterion for thoracic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Frontal Impact Response for Pole Crash Scenarios
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Comparison of roadside crash injury metrics using event data recorders
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub