Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Field Test and Rating of Arlington Curved-Steel Box-Girder Bridge: Jacksonville, Florida

Abstract

A load capacity rating procedure and the results of field tests conducted on the Arlington curved-steel box-girder bridge are presented. Two Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) test trucks with a total weight of up to 117 tons provided the static loading. One FDOT test truck with a total weight of 52.7 tons applied the dynamic loading. The actual behavior of the bridge was ascertained by comparing the field test results with those obtained from three different theoretical mechanical models. Analysis demonstrates how the actual mechanical behavior and load capacity of a curved-steel box-girder bridge can be well predicted by a proper finite element method based on as-built bridge plans. Some important parameters, such as impact factors, the effective width of the concrete slab, and the structural effect of barriers, are discussed. Finally, the load rating factors for a variety of Florida's rating vehicles were determined on the basis of a finite element model generated from field test results and analytical modeling of the bridge. The current capacity ratings are approximately 17% to 27% higher than those determined in 1988 using a conventional analytical method. The capacity increase is due mostly to the conservativeness of traditional methods and codes. The research results are instructive and applicable to bridge design and bridge load rating.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Huang D. Z. Field Test and Analysis of Ninpo Steel Arch Bridge. Report No. TJB1989-008. Department of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 1986.
2. Lichtenstein A. G. Bridge Rating Through Nondestructive Testing. Final Draft. In Manual for Bridge Rating Through Load Testing. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1993.
3. Chajes M. J., Mertz D. R., and Commander B. Experimental Load Rating of a Posted Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1–10.
4. Barker M. G. Quantifying Field-Test Behavior for Rating Steel Girder Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2002, pp. 254–261.
5. Moses F., Lebet J. P., and Bet R. Applications of Field Testing to Bridge Evaluation. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1745–1762.
6. Bakht B., and Jaeger L. G. Ultimate Load Test of Slab-on-Girder Bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1608–1624.
7. Fu G., and Tang J. Proof Load Formula for Highway Bridge Rating. In Transportation Research Record 1371, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1992, pp. 129–141.
8. Schulz J. L. In Search of Better Load Ratings. Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 63, No. 9, 1993, pp. 62–65.
9. Schulz J. L. A Cost-Effective Technique for Better Load Ratings. Better Roads, July 1995, pp. 33–34.
10. Shahawy M., and Garcia A. M. Structural Research and Testing in Florida. Research Report No. SRR-01-89. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 1989.
11. Sennah K. M., and Kennedy J. B. Literature Review in Analysis of Box-Girder Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2002, pp. 134–143.
12. Huang D. Z., Wang T. L., and Shahaway M. Dynamic Response of Multigirder Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 12, 1992, pp. 2387–2402.
13. Huang D. Z., and Wang T. L. Dynamic Behavior of Horizontally Curved I-Girder Bridges. An International Journal of Computer and Structures, Vol. 57, No. 4, 1995, pp. 703–714.
14. Huang D. Z., and Ansley M. Arlington Bridge Field Test and Rating. Research Report No. SRC-H001-02. Structural Research Center, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2002.
15. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1996.
16. Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Highway Bridges. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993.
17. Huang D. Z., Wang T. L., and Shahaway M. Vibration of Horizontally Curved Box Girder Bridges due to Vehicles. Journal of Computer and Structures, Vol. 68, 1998, pp. 513–528.
18. Huang D. Z. Dynamic Analysis of Steel Curved Box Girder Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2001, pp. 506–513.
19. Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.
20. NCHRP Research Results Digest No. 234: Manual for Bridge Rating Through Load Testing. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., Nov. 1998.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dongzhou Huang
Florida Department of Transportation, Structural Research Center, 2007 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32310

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 12

  1. Potential Improvement in Rating Factors of Concrete T-Beam Bridges thr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effect of Bridge Skew on the Analytical and Experimental Responses of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Mechanics-based algorithms to determine the current state of a bridge ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Effect of Skewness on Rotational Response of the Curved Bridge Dec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Summary Review of Structural Health Monitoring Applications for Highwa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Load distribution for composite steel–concrete horizontally curved box...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Structure Identification and Load Capacity Rating of Veteran's Memoria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Impact Factors of Curved Steel Multibox Girder Bridges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Full-Scale Test and Analysis of a Curved Steel-Box Girder Bridge
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Lateral Load Distribution in Curved Steel I-Girder Bridges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Dynamic Test and Analysis of Curved Steel Box Girder Bridges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub