Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2004

Vehicle Height Affects Drivers’ Speed Perception: Implications for Rollover Risk

Abstract

The North American vehicle fleet has evolved in recent years to include an increasing percentage of pickups, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), and minivans. In 2002, sales of light trucks and vans accounted for almost half of all Canadian vehicle sales. The increased popularity of SUVs has been particularly striking, with a 143% increase in sales since 1993. Typically larger and heavier than automobiles, SUVs are built on frames that are more rigid and that ride higher, characteristics that not only provide increased physical protection to their occupants but also add to their overall appeal. SUVs, however, are involved in fatal rollover crashes at a much higher rate than cars. While this is undoubtedly due in part to their stiffer frames and higher centers of gravity, the manner in which SUVs are driven may also play a role. SUV drivers are often anecdotally reported to be overconfident, tending to overestimate their vehicle’s capabilities. Evidence suggests that because they sit higher, drivers of SUVs (and vans and pickups) are less able to judge speed accurately. A study was conducted to assess drivers’ chosen speed when they operated a simulated vehicle while viewing the road from a low eye height and a high eye height. Participants were instructed to drive, without reference to a speedometer, at a highway driving speed at which they felt comfortable and safe. As expected, drivers seated at a high eye height drove faster than when they were seated at a low eye height. The influence of driver eye height and lead vehicle size (large versus small) on the following distance from a slower-moving lead vehicle was also investigated. Regardless of eye height, the differences in following distances suggest that the size of the lead vehicle may affect how closely drivers choose to follow it.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Census of Vehicles in Operation Canada. Road Safety Directorate, Transport Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2002.
2. Initiatives to Address Vehicle Compatibility. Integrated Project Team Report, Docket No. NHTSA-2003-14623. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
3. Kockelman K. M., and Zhao Y. Behavioral Distinctions: The Use of Light-Duty Trucks and Passenger Cars. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 3, No. 3, Dec. 2000, pp. 47–60.
4. Davis S. C., and Truett L. F. An Analysis of the Impact of Sport Utility Vehicles in the United States. Report ORNL/TM-2000/147. U.S. Department of Energy, 2000.
5. Initiatives to Address the Mitigation of Vehicle Rollover. Integrated Project Team Report, Docket No. NHTSA-2003-14622. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
6. Boucher D. Occurrence of Light-Duty Vehicle Rollovers in TRAID (Traffic Accident Information Database). Publication TP10431-E. Transport Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, March 2003.
7. Farmer C. M., and Lund A. K. Rollover Risk of Cars and Light Trucks After Accounting for Driver and Environmental Factors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 163–173.
8. Leonard S. D. Safety Practices with Children in Autos: Observations of Inadequate Behaviors. Proc., 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001, pp. 1497–1501.
9. Utter D. Passenger Vehicle Driver Cell Phone Use—Results from the Fall 2000 National Occupant Protection Use Survey. Report DOT-HS-809-293. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 2001.
10. Overview of Vehicle Compatibility/LTV Issues. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Feb. 1998.
11. Gibson J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1979.
12. Matthews M. L. Speed Limit Compliance and Judgment of Velocity by Car Drivers. Proc., Human Factors Association of Canada 11th Annual Meeting, 1978.
13. McClane R. C., and Wierwille W. W. The Influence of Motion and Audio Cues on Driver Performance in an Automobile Simulator. Human Factors, Vol. 17, 1975, pp. 488–501.
14. Triggs T. J. Speed Estimation. Automotive Engineering and Litigation, Vol. 1 (Suppl.), 1986, pp. 95–124.
15. Noel R. W., Hunter C. J., Casey B. M., and Phoenix G. M. Telepresence Effects on the Relationship of Velocity to the Psychological Experience of Speed. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, 1999, pp. 1247–1250.
16. Noel R. W., and Hunter C. J. Mapping the Physical World to Psychological Reality: Creating Synthetic Environments. In Proceedings on the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, Techniques (Boyarski Daniel and Kellogg Wendy A., eds.), ACM Press, New York, 2000, pp. 203–207.
17. Lee J. Human Factors in Information Processing During Driving: Effect of Eye-Level on Cognitive Load and Speed Control. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1995.
18. Tasca L. Aggressive Driving: Ontario Perspective. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
19. DePasquale J. P., Geller E. S., Clarke S. W., and Littleton L. C. Measuring Road Rage. Development of the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 32, 2001, pp. 1–16.
20. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1999.
21. Special Report 265: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Rating System for Rollover Resistance: An Assessment. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.
22. Kockelman K. M., and Shabih R. A. Effect of Vehicle Type on Capacity of Signalized Intersections: The Case of Light-Duty Trucks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, 2000, pp. 506–512.
23. Smiley, A. Driver Speed Estimation: What Road Designers Should Know. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2004
Issue published: January 2004

Rights and permissions

© 2004 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christina M. Rudin-Brown
Transport Canada, 330 Sparks Street, Tower C, Ottawa, Ontario K1A ON5, Canada

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 55

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 11

  1. A Case for Raising the Camera: A Driving Simulator Test of Camera-Moni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  2. A bee colony optimization (BCO) and type-2 fuzzy approach to measuring...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Rear-view perception in driving: Distance information is privileged in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Study on the Maximum Safe Instantaneous Input of the Steering Wheel ag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The Ups and Downs of Camera-Monitor Systems: The Effect of Camera Posi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  6. Kullanılan Araç Segmenti ile Sürücü Davranışları ve Sürücü Becerileri ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Speeding and Speed Modification of Older Drivers: Does Vehicle Type Ma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Using the Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference Systems to Compare the Impac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. It's time to take the psychology of biological time into account: spee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Vehicle Size and Driver Perceptions of Safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Use of Context-Sensitive Methods to Influence Operating Speeds...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub