Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Assessing Feasibility of Transport Megaprojects: Swissmetro European Market Study

Abstract

Results of the Swissmetro European Market Study are presented. Swissmetro is a proposed high-speed passenger ground transportation system that would operate magnetically levitated trains in underground tunnels with reduced air pressure by using linear motor technology. The market study considered the market feasibility of constructing Swissmetro on potential European corridors. It evaluated technology, market conditions, European policy, investment costs, and risks associated with the project. The study conclusion was that there is not sufficient market potential for the Swissmetro system in European long-distance transport. The main problems with Swissmetro identified in the study were the long time necessary to bring the technology to commercial deployment; the lack of obvious corridors (most high-demand corridors will be served by high-speed rail by 2020); strong competition from other modes, such as air and high-speed rail; European Union policy of supporting an interoperable system of rail lines; Swissmetro's high capital and operating costs—plus the risk that these costs may be significantly underestimated—and Swissmetro's long construction time.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Weidmann U. Buchmueller S. Rieder M. Erath A. Nash A. and Carrel A. Europaeische Marktstudie fuer das System Swissmetro, Phase 1, Schlussbericht, Juli 2006. Swissmetro European Market Study, Phase 1. Final report. Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2006.
2. Flyvbjerg B. Bruzelius N. and Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003.
3. Hall P. Great Planning Disasters. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982.
4. Altshuler A. and Luberoff D. Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Brookings Institute Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.
5. Vuchic V. and Casello J. An Evaluation of Maglev Technology and Its Comparison with High-Speed Rail. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 2, Spring 2002; pp. 33–49.
6. Macabrey N. and Trottet Y. Swissmetro: A Transport System for the 21st Century. Route et Traffic, No. 10, Oct. 1999, pp. 386–393.
7. Swissmetro AG; Technische und Oekonomische Machbarkeitsstudie der Swissmetro-Strecke Basel-Zuerich, Kurzfassung des Schlussberichts (Technical and Economic Market Feasibility Study for the Swissmetro Basel-Zurich Line. Final Report Summary), April 10, 2003.
8. Transrapid International. www.transrapid.de. Accessed July 30, 2006.
9. Transrapid International. Taking Off for the Future: The Maglev System in Munich, Oct. 2004. www.transrapid.de/pdf/TRI_mue_10_04_E.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2006.
10. Hondius H. Metrorapid: Prestigeprojekt oder Sinnvolle Ergaenzung des SPNV? Der Nahverkehr, 9/2001, pp. 38–42. (Transrapid for Ruhr: A Prestige Project or Functional Completion of the Regional Transit Network?)
11. Schach R. Jehle P. and Naumann R. Transrapid und Rad-Schiene-Hochgeschwindigkeitsbahn: Gesamtheitlicher Systemvergleich (Transrapid and Wheel-Rail High-Speed Rail: A System Comparison) Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
12. European Union. Rail Transport and Interoperability. ec.europa.eu/transport/rail/index_en.html. Accessed July 30, 2006.
13. Trans-European Transport Network: TEN-T Priority Axes and Projects 2005. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, 2005.
14. Briginshaw D. The Complexities of High-Speed Rail. International Rail Journal, Nov. 2005, pp. 19–21.
15. International Union of Railways. European High-Speed Rail Network, Version 01.10.2002. Prognosis 2020, High-Speed Division. Paris, 2002.
16. European Transportation Demand Model. Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2005.
17. Kennedy N. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit: Promises, Problems, Prospects. Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1971.
18. Paaswell R. Goldman T. Seaman M. Thorson E. and Gordon C. Analysis of Capital Cost Elements and Their Effect on Operating Costs. Final report. FTA, Nov. 2005. web.gc.cuny.edu/economics/SeminarPapers/spring_2006/Paaswell%20Paper%20utrc-2005-_03_14.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew Nash
Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-PauliStrasse 15, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulrich Weidmann
Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-PauliStrasse 15, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefan Buchmueller
Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-PauliStrasse 15, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus Rieder
Institute for Transportation Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-PauliStrasse 15, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 49

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Low Pressure Tube Transport—An Alternative to Ground Road Transport—Ae...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Intermodal Competition in Freight Transport - Political Impacts and Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub