Eye Movement Patterns for Novice Teen Drivers: Does 6 Months of Driving Experience Make a Difference?
Abstract
Attention to the road is essential to safe driving, but the development of appropriate eye glance scanning behaviors may require substantial driving experience. Novice teen drivers may focus almost exclusively on the road ahead rather than scanning the mirrors, and when performing secondary tasks, they may spend more time with eyes on the task than on the road. This paper examines the extent to which the scanning of novice teens improves with experience. For this study, 18 novice teen (younger than 17.5 years old) and 18 experienced adult drivers performed a set of in-vehicle tasks and a baseline driving segment on a test track, the teens within 4 weeks of licensure and then again 6 months later. This paper addresses the following questions: Did teen eye glance performance improve from initial assessment? Did teens and adults still differ after 6 months? Results for some tasks showed that rearview and left mirror–window (LM-W) glances improved for teens from initial testing to the 6-month follow-up and that some differences between teens and adults at initial testing were no longer significant at the 6-month follow-up, suggesting significant learning effects. The frequency of rearview and LM-W glances during secondary tasks improved among teens at the 6-month follow-up, but teens still had significantly fewer glances to mirrors than did adults when engaged in a secondary task.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. 10 Leading Causes of Death, United States, 2002, All Races, Both Sexes, Ages 16–17 (WISQARS Fatal Injuries: Leading Causes of Death Reports). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., 2002.
2. Ulmer R. G. Williams A. F. and Preusser D. Crash Involvements of 16-Year-Old Drivers. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 97–103.
3. Mayhew D. R. Simpson H. M. and Pak A. Changes in Collision Rates Among Novice Drivers During the First Months of Driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35 No. 5, 2003, pp. 683–691.
4. McCartt A. T. Shabanova V. I. and Leaf W. A. Driving Experience, Crashes, and Traffic Citations of Teenage Beginning Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3 2003, pp. 311–320.
5. Klauer S. G. Dingus T. A. Neale V. L. Sudweeks J. D. and Ramsey D. J. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study. DOT-HS-810-594. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation. www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/810594/images/810594.pdf.
6. Mourant R. R. and Rockwell T. H. Visual Information Seeking of Novice Drivers. SAE paper 700397. Proc., 13th FISITA Conference, 1970, SAE, Warrendale, Pa., pp. 704–711.
7. Mourant R. R. and Rockwell T. H. Strategies of Visual Search by Novice and Experienced Drivers. Human Factors, Vol. 14, No. 4 1972, pp. 325–335.
8. Groeger J. A. Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task. Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom, 2000.
9. Mourant R. R. Rockwell T. H. and Rackoff N. J. Drivers’ Eye Movements and Visual Workload. In Highway Research Record 292, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1969, pp. 1–10.
10. Mourant R. R. and Rockwell T. H. Mapping Eye-Movement Patterns to the Visual Scene in Driving: An Exploratory Study. Human Factors, Vol. 12, No. 1, Santa Monica, Calif., 1970, pp. 81–87.
11. Dingus T. A. Antin J. F. Hulse M. C. and Wierwille W. W. Human Factors Associated with In-Car Navigation System Usage. Proc., Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Oct. 24–28, 1988, Anaheim, Calif., Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1988, pp. 1448–1452.
12. Gellatly A. W. and Kleiss J. A. Visual Attention Demand Evaluation of Conventional and Multifunction In-Vehicle Information Systems. Proc., IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, Vol. 3, July 30-Aug. 4, 2000, San Diego, Calif., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2000, pp. 282–285.
13. Kurokawa K. and Wierwille W. W. Validation of a Driving Simulation Facility for Instrument Panel Task Performance. Proc., Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, Oct. 8–12, 1990, Orlando, Fla., Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1990, pp. 1299–1303.
14. Tijerina L. Parmer E. B. and Goodman M. J. Individual Differences and In-Vehicle Distraction While Driving: A Test Track Study and Psychometric Evaluation. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 1999, Houston, Tex., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1999, pp. 982–986.
15. Wierwille W. W. Antin J. F. Dingus T. A. and Hulse M. C. Visual Attentional Demand of an In-Car Navigation Display System. In Vision in Vehicles II (Gale A. G. Freeman M. H. Haslegrave C. M. Smith P. and Taylor S. P., eds.), North Holland Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1988, pp. 307–316.
16. Zwahlen H. T. Adams C. C. and DeBald D. P. Safety Aspects of CRT Touch Panel Controls in Automobiles. In Vision in Vehicles II (Gale A. G. Freeman M. H. Haslegrave C. M. Smith P. and Taylor S. P., eds.), North Holland Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1988, pp. 335–344.
17. Road Vehicles—Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems. Part 1: Definitions and Parameters. ISO 15007-1:2002, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
18. Green P. Where Do Drivers Look While Driving (and for How Long)? In Human Factors in Traffic Safety (Dewar R. E. and Olson P. L., eds.), Lawyers and Judges Publishing, Tucson, Ariz., 2002, pp. 77–110.
19. Recarte M. A. and Nunes L. M. Effects of Verbal and Spatial-Imagery Tasks on Eye Fixations While Driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 6, No. 1 2000, pp. 31–43.
20. Recarte M. A. and Nunes L. M. Mental Workload While Driving: Effects on Visual Search, Discrimination, and Decision Making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 9, No. 2 2003, pp. 119–137.
21. Crundall D. E. and Underwood G. Effects of Experience and Processing Demands Information Acquisition in Drivers. Ergonomics, Vol. 41, No. 4 1998, pp. 448–458.
22. Wikman A.-S. Nieminen T. and Summala H. Driving Experience and Time-Sharing During In-Car Tasks on Roads of Different Width. Ergonomics, Vol 41, No. 3: 1998, pp. 358–372.
23. Greenberg J. Tijerina L. Curry R. Artz B. Cathey L. Kochhar D. Kozak K. Blommer M. and Grant P. Driver Distraction: Evaluation with Event Detection Paradigm. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1843, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1–9.
24. Pradhan A. K. Hammel K. R. DeRamus R. Pollatsek A. Noyce D. A. and Fisher D. L. The Use of Eye Movements to Evaluate the Effects of Driver Age on Risk Perception in an Advanced Driving Simulator. Human Factors, Vol. 47, No. 4 2005, pp. 840–852.
25. Chisholm S. L. Caird J. K. Lockhard J. A. Teteris L. E. and Smiley A. Novice and Experienced Driving Performance with Cell Phones. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, Oct. 16–20, 2006, San Francisco, Calif., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2006, pp. 2354–2358.
26. Lee S. E. Olsen E. C. B. and Simons-Morton B. G. Eyeglance Behavior of Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Drivers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1980, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 57–64.
27. Aguiló M. C. F. Development of Guidelines for In-Vehicle Information Presentation: Text vs. Speech. MS thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 2004.
28. Liu A. Boyett J. and Xiong X. Sample Size Calculation for Planning Group Sequential Longitudinal Trials. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 19, 2000, pp. 205–220.
29. Olsen E. C. B. Simons-Morton B. G. Lee S. E. and Neale V. L. Intersection Behavior of Novice Teen Drivers and Experienced Adult Drivers. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, Sept. 26–30, 2005, Orlando, Fla., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2005, pp. 1907–1911.
30. Olsen E. C. B. Simons-Morton B. G. and Lee S. E. Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Drivers on the Smart Road Intersection: Does Six Months of Experience Matter? Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, Oct. 16–20, 2006, San Francisco, Calif., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2006, pp. 2283–2287.
31. Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP). Driver Workload Metrics Project: Task 2 Final Report, Appendices. DOT HS-910–635. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/urd-12/Driver%20Workload%20Metrics_appendices.pdf.
32. Wierwille W. W. Statistical Techniques for Instrument Panel Arrangement. In Manned Systems Design: Methods, Equipment, and Applications (Moraal J. and Kraiss K. F., eds.), Plenum, New York, 1981, pp. 201–218.
33. Zheng X. S. McConkie G. W. and Tai Y.-C. Effects of Cognitive Tasks on Drivers’ Eye Behavior and Performance. Presented at International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Park City, Utah, 2003.
34. Mannering F. Modeling Driver Decision Making: A Review of Methodological Alternatives. In Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems (Barfield W. and Dingus T. A., eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1998, pp. 187–216.
35. Zheng X. S. McConkie G. W. and Tai Y.-C. The Effect of Secondary Tasks on Drivers’ Scanning Behavior. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, Oct. 13–17, 2003, Denver, Colo., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2003, pp. 1900–1903.
36. Olsen E. C. B. Modeling Slow Lead Vehicle Lane Changing. PhD dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. 2003. scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12032003-152916/.
37. Pradhan A. K. Fisher D. L. Pollatsek A. Knodler M. and Langone M. Field Evaluation of a Risk Awareness and Perception Training Program for Younger Drivers. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, Oct. 16–20, 2006, San Francisco, Calif., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 2006, pp. 2388–2391.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 33
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 12
- Pilot Selection in the Era of Virtual Reality: Algorithms for Accurate...
- Impact of experience on visual behavior and driving performance of hig...
- Characterization of visual scanning while driving for the identificati...
- The mediating effect of driver characteristics on risky driving behavi...
- Reducing young drivers’ crash risk: Are we there yet? An ecological sy...
- Impairment
- Eye Movements—Utility, Method, and Measurements
- Do as I say, not as I do: Distracted driving behavior of teens and the...
- Social Norms and Risk Perception: Predictors of Distracted Driving Beh...
- Driving simulator validation with hazard perception
- The effects of focused attention training on the duration of novice dr...
- Detection of Road Hazards by Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Drivers
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
