Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Development of Footprint Methodology for Road Safety

Abstract

Progress in traffic safety is the result of many developments, including political decisions, the development of safety plans and actions, and the implementation of these plans and actions. This paper explores ways of presenting road safety information to help decision makers understand how the interaction between many factors leads to improvements in the safety quality components of the traffic system and finally to reductions in road casualties. Simple one-factor bar charts cannot be used to this effect. In the SUNflower+6 project, a methodology has been developed that results in a “road safety footprint” for a country or jurisdiction. This footprint helps to identify strong and weak points in the traffic system, to direct to further and more detailed analyses, and to assist in finding ways to further road safety improvements. The development of this method was one of the goals of the SUNflower+6 project, which aimed to assess the state of the art in road safety of nine European countries and presented recommendations for the improvement of road safety in these countries and the European Commission. A footprint provides a representation of the road safety status and development over time in a country and can be used for benchmarking purposes. At this stage, the proposed methodology is considered to be a first step that may eventually grow into a widespread tool for benchmarking road safety. In the near future, further research will be conducted to learn from practical application of the developed methodology in more countries and jurisdictions in the world.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wegman F. Eksler V. Hayes S. Lynam D. Morsink P. and Oppe (eds.) S. SUNflower+6: A Comparative Study of the Development of Road Safety in the Sunflower+6 Countries. Final Report. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. sunflower.swov.nl. 2005.
2. Koornstra M. Lynam D. Nilsson G. Noordzij P. Pettersson H.-E. Wegman F. and Wouters P. SUNflower: A Comparative Study of the Development of Road Safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2002.
3. Worldbank. www.worldbank.org. 2006.
4. Morsink P. Oppe S. Reurings M. and Wegman F. SUNflower+6: Development and Application of a Footprint Methodology for the SUNflower+6 Countries. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. sunflower.swov.nl. 2005.
5. Road Safety Strategy 2010: A Consultation Document. National Road Safety Committee, Land Transport Safety Authority, Wellington, New Zealand, 2000.
6. Rumar K. Transport Safety Visions, Targets and Strategies: Beyond 2000. First European Transport Safety Lecture, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
7. Hakkert A. S. and Wesemann (eds.) P. The Use of Efficiency Assessment Tools: Solutions to Barriers. Report R-2005-2. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2005.
8. Lynam D. Nilsson G. Morsink P. Sexton B. Twisk D. Goldenbeld C. and Wegman F. SUNflower+6: An Extended Study of the Development of Road Safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. TRL Ltd., Crowthorne, U. K. sunflower.swov.nl. 2005.
9. Hayes S. Serrano S. Pagès L. Zori P. Handanos Y. Katsochis D. de Macedo A. L. Cardoso J. and Vieira Gomes S. SUNflower+6: A Comparative Study of the Development of Road Safety in Greece, Portugal, Spain and Catalonia. DSD, Barcelona, Spain. sunflower.swov.nl. 2005.
10. Eksler V. Heinrich J. Gyurmati J. Holló P. Bensa B. Bolko N. and Krivec D. SUNflower+6: A Comparative Study of the Development of Road Safety in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia. CDV, Brno, Czech Republic. sunflower.swov.nl. 2005.
11. State of the Art Report on Road Safety Performance Indicators. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, safetynet.swov.nl. 2005.
12. International Road Traffic and Accident Database. Bundesanstalt fuer Strassenwesen BASt. www.bast.de. 2004.
13. Trinca G. W. Johnstone I. R. Campbell B. J. Haight F. A. Knight P. R. Mackay G. M. McLean A. J. and Petrucelli E. Reducing Traffic Injury; A Global Challenge. Royal Australian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
14. Transport Safety Performance Indicators. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
15. Wegman F. Implementing, Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating a Road Safety Programme. Report D-2003-12. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Peter Morsink
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Siem Oppe
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Martine Reurings
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Fred Wegman
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 39

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Safety ranking definition for infrastructures with high PTW flow
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Inter-national benchmarking of road safety: State of the art
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub