Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Current Department of Transportation Environmental Management System Development Efforts: Examples from Construction, Maintenance, Project Development, and Planning

Abstract

This paper examines how the environmental management system (EMS) at departments of transportation (DOTs) has evolved and provides examples of recent developments and practices that other DOTs can consider and use as a source in an evolving EMS. A number of practical insights can be gained by examining EMS experiences at several DOTs. Generally, the EMSs that have delivered benefits have had successful mechanisms for monitoring effectiveness, incorporating lessons learned, and managing continual improvement. They have relied tactically on what exists already, are geared toward the organization's mission, and seek to support success in nonenvironmental areas. They build on vigorous environmental programs, have procedures that can be integrated as much as possible into current routine practices, and strive to demystify environmental compliance for both DOT and contractor personnel. DOTs in the vanguard have focused on increased compliance assurance and cost-effectiveness, adoption and development of best management practices and sustainability practices, enhanced land and resource use planning and management, accelerating and streamlining the project delivery processes, and improved intergovernmental relationships and stakeholder confidence. Challenges commonly include coping with the demands of intensive up-front effort with limited staff time, realistically quantifying resource requirements, and establishing straightforward metrics for monitoring. Effective management has been enhanced in some cases by using information technology tools, which facilitate the flow of environmental information; tracking metrics; tracking project schedules, budgets, and personnel; communicating corporate knowledge; analyzing impacts; and using geo-references for planning stage decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on the Use of Environmental Management Systems in Enforcement. 2003. www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/policies/incentives/ems/emssettlementguidance.pdf.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Incentives for Self-Policing: Discovery, Correction, and Prevention of Violations. Federal Register, Vol. 65, April 11, 2000, p. 19618.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marie Venner
ICF International, Inc., 9947 West Oregon Place, Lakewood, CO 80232.
Michael DeWit
ICF International, Suite 808, 277 Wellington Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3E4, Canada.
Will Gibson
ICF International, Suite 1000, 1725 I Street, Northwest, Washington, DC 20006.
Rodney Concienne
Texas Department of Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701.
Sonal Sanghavi
Maryland State Highway Administration, P.O. Box 548, 7201 Corporate Center Drive, Hanover, MD 21076.
Julie Hunkins
Office of Environmental Quality, Department of Transportation, 1502 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1502.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 32

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub