Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Incorporating Geophysical Remote Sensing into Transportation Archeological Investigations

Abstract

Transportation agencies interested in surveying cultural resources within a project area have a suite of commonly used archeological methods available to discover buried features. Geophysical remote sensing (GRS) offers archeologists additional means by which to determine an area's sensitivity for archeological resources. Moreover, GRS technologies achieve this while maintaining noninvasive examination of culturally sensitive or difficult-to-reach areas. Funded by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, this study investigated both the existing uses and potential innovative applications of GRS at state departments of transportation (DOTs) through an extended survey, case studies, and stakeholder interviews. States that have experience with GRS on archeological investigations are identified, as well as the types of technologies often employed, advantages and disadvantages of their use, and the kinds of information needed to facilitate future agency decisions. A study survey was sent to all 50 state DOTs after appropriate participants—usually the DOT state archeologist—were identified, and responses were received from 30 DOTs. Results indicate some initial experience with geophysical technologies at state DOTs, as well as a significant need for additional regional information regarding available consultants, technologies, and data reliability. Although GRS is not appropriate for use in all situations, this research has shown that several state DOTs have successfully utilized multiple technologies and found results to be consistent with the needs of transportation archeological investigations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bevan B. Geophysical Exploration for Archaeology: An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service, Lincoln, Neb., 1998.
2. Somers L. Hargrave M. and Simms J. Geophysical Surveys in Archaeology: Guidance for Surveyors and Sponsors. Report ERDC/CERL SR-03-21. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2003.
3. Johnson J. Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective. University of Mississippi, Oxford, 2006.
4. Klein T. H. Sebastian L. Ruscavage-Barz S. M. Ford S. and Watkins J. E. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 347: Managing Archeological Investigations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lilly Shoup
ICF International, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031.
Larry O'Rourke
ICF International, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031.
Chester Fung
FHWA, Office of Planning, 400 7th Street, Southwest, Washington, D.C. 20590.
Polly Quick
ICF International, 394 Pacific Avenue, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub