Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Application of Constrained Enumeration Approach to Multimodal Choice Set Generation

Abstract

Collected data often include only information about chosen routes. To gain insight into travelers’ route choice behavior or to predict route shares, one must know the set of alternatives from which travelers have chosen their routes. An alternative approach to choice set generation in mixed multimodal networks is presented. This new algorithm—a run-based, constrained enumeration method that uses branch-and-bound techniques—is suitable for both estimation and prediction. One key characteristic of the algorithm is a set of constraints that reflects observed travel behavior. The proposed algorithm for choice set generation can be applied to a complete multimodal network at once. However, by exploiting knowledge about the structure of multimodal trips, the separate application of the algorithm to partial networks and consecutive concatenation of subroutes into complete door-to-door routes substantially reduce computation times without resulting in incomplete choice sets. This algorithm for choice set generation has been calibrated for and successfully applied to a real-size, mixed multimodal transport network in the Netherlands. A comparison of generated choice sets with reported chosen and known alternatives indicated that the algorithm can generate these alternatives, with high coverage levels as a result. This result clearly indicates that this constrained enumeration approach meets the requirements for choice set generation and thus offers interesting perspectives for route choice analysis and the prediction of route shares. Furthermore, the separate application of the algorithm to partial networks and the consecutive concatenation of subroutes into complete door-to-door trips substantially do not result in incomplete choice sets.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. Modeling Travel Behavior in Multi-modal Networks. PhD thesis. TRAIL Thesis Series T2005/4. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2005.
2. Prato C. G. and Bekhor S. Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 19–28.
3. Van der Waerden P. Borgers A. and Timmermans H. J. P. Choice Set Composition in the Context of Pedestrians’ Route Choice Modeling. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
4. Lawler E. L. Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1976.
5. Shier R. D. On Algorithms for Finding the K-Shortest Path in a Network. Networks, Vol. 9, 1979, pp. 195–214.
6. Van der Zijpp N. J. and Catalano S. F. Path Enumeration by Finding the Constrained K-Shortest Paths. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 6 2005, pp. 545–563.
7. Azevedo J. A. Santos Costa M. E. O. Silvestre Maderia J. J. E. R. and Vieira Martins E. Q. An Algorithm for the Ranking Shortest Paths. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 69, 1993, pp. 97–106.
8. De La Barra T. Perez B. and Anez J. Multidimensional Path Search and Assignment. In Proc., 21st PTRC Summer Meeting, Manchester, United Kingdom, 1993.
9. Park D. and Rilett L. R. Identifying Multiple and Reasonable Paths in Transportation Networks: A Heuristic Approach. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 31–37.
10. Ben-Akiva M. E. Bergman M. J. Daly A. J. and Ramaswamy R. Modelling Inter-urban Route Choice Behavior. In Proc., 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (Volmuller J. and Hamerslag R., eds.). VNU Science Press, Utrecht, Netherlands, 1984, pp. 299–330.
11. Fiorenzo-Catalano S. van Nes R. Bovy P. H. L. Choice Set Generation for Multi-modal Travel Analysis. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 4, No. 2 2004, pp. 195–209.
12. Friedrich M. Hofsass I. and Wekeck S. Timetable-Based Transit Assignment Using Branch and Bound Techniques. In Transportation Research Record 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 100–107.
13. Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. van Nes R. and Bovy P. H. L. A Constrained Enumeration Approach to Multi-modal Choice Set Generation. In Proc., 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research (CD-ROM), Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 2006.
14. Ramming M. S. Network Knowledge and Route Choice. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.
15. Abdelghany K. F. and Mahmassani H. S. Dynamic Trip Assignment-Simulation Model for Intermodal Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1771, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 52–60.
16. Abdelghany K. F. and Mahmassani H. S. Multi-Objective Shortest Path Algorithm for Large-Scale Inter-modal Networks. Presented at INFORMS Annual Fall Meeting, Philadelphia, Penn., 1999.
17. Abdelghany K. F. Stochastic Dynamic Traffic Assignment for the Intermodal Transportation Networks with Consistent Information Supply Strategies. PhD thesis. University of Texas, Austin, 2001.
18. Benjamins M. Lindveld C. D. R. and van Nes R. Multimodal Travel Choice Modeling Using a Super Network Approach. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
19. Bovy P. H. L. and Catalano S. F. Stochastic Route Choice Set Generation; Behavioral and Probabilistic Foundations. In Proc., 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research (CD-ROM), Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 2006.
20. Train K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002.
21. van Nes R. Design of Multi-modal Transport Networks: A Hierarchical Approach. PhD thesis. Trail Thesis Series T2002/5. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2002.
22. Cascetta E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001.
23. Nuzzolo A. and Russo F. An Equilibrium Assignment Model for Intercity Transit Networks. In Proc., TRISTAN III Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1994.
24. De Cea J. and Fernandez E. Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport System: An Assignment Model. Transportation Science, Vol. 27, No. 2 1993, pp. 133–147.
25. Bovy P. H. L. and Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. Modeling Route Choice Behavior in Multi-modal Transport Networks. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 4 2005, pp. 341–368.
26. Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. van Nes R. and Hoogendoorn S. P. Modeling Transfers in Multimodal Trips: Explaining Correlations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 144–153.
27. Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. van Nes R. Hoogendoorn S. P. and Bovy P. H. L. Home-Activity Approach to Multimodal Travel Choice Modeling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 180–187.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser
Delft University of Technology, Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
Dutch Transport Research Centre AVV, P.O. Box 1031, 3000 BA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Piet Bovy
Delft University of Technology, Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
Rob van Nes
Delft University of Technology, Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Public transport path choice estimation based on trip data from dedica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Determining an efficient and precise choice set for public transport b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. An assignment model for public transport networks with both schedule- ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Calibrating Route Choice Sets for an Urban Public Transport Network us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Stochastic user equilibrium with a bounded choice model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub