Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Oil Independence: Achievable National Goal or Empty Slogan?

Abstract

Oil independence has been a goal of U.S. energy policy for the past 30 years, yet the term has never been rigorously defined. A rigorous, measurable definition is proposed: to reduce the costs of oil dependence to less than 1% of gross domestic product in the next 20 to 25 years, with 95% probability. A simulation model incorporating the possibility of oil supply disruptions and other sources of uncertainty is used to test whether two alternative energy policy strategies—business as usual (BAU) and an interpretation of the strategy proposed by the National Commission on Energy Policy (NCEP)—can achieve oil independence for the United States. BAU does not produce oil independence. The augmented NCEP strategy comes close to achieving oil independence for the U.S. economy within the next 20 to 25 years, but more effort is needed to achieve full independence. The success of the strategy appears to be robust regardless of how the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries responds to it. Expected annual savings are estimated to exceed $250 billion per year by 2030.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Fialka J. J. Energy Independence: A Dry Hole? Wall Street Journal, July 5, 2006.
2. Energy Information Administration. 2002 Energy Consumptions by Manufacturer: Data Tables 10.4 and 10.8, U.S. Department of Energy. www.eia.doe.gov/emev/mecs/data02/shelltables.html. Accessed March 8, 2005.
3. Lovins A. B. Datta E. K. Bustnes O.-E. Koomey J. G. and Glasgow N. J. Winning the Oil Endgame. Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, Colo., 2005.
4. Grumet J. S. Prepared Statement before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, May 16, 2006. In Energy Diplomacy and Security: A Compilation of Statements by Witnesses Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 109th Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006. www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html.
5. Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary. www.m-w.com.
6. Adelman M. A. The Real Oil Problem. Regulation, Vol. 27, No. 1 2004, pp. 16–21.
7. Yergin D. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1991.
8. Greene D. L. A Note on OPEC Market Power and Oil Prices. Energy Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2 1991, pp. 123–129.
9. Greene D. L. and Ahmad S. Costs of U.S. Oil Dependence: 2005 Update. Report ORNL/TM-2005/45. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2005.
10. Annual Energy Outlook 2006. Report DOE/EIA-0383(2006). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, 2006.
11. Greene D. L. and Leiby P. N. The Oil Security Metrics Model: A Tool for Evaluating the Prospective Oil Security Benefits of DOE's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy R&D Programs. Report ORNL/TM-2006/505. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2006.
12. Beccue P. C. and Huntington H. G. An Assessment of Oil Market Disruption Risks. Final Report EMF SR 8. Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif., 2005.
13. Leiby P. N. and Bowman D. The Value of Expanding the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, ORNL/TM-2000/179, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2000.
14. Ending the Energy Stalemate: A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America's Energy Challenges. National Commission on Energy Policy, Washington, D.C., 2004.
15. Elliot R. N. Langer T. and Nadel S. Reducing Oil Use Through Energy Efficiency: Opportunities Beyond Cars and Light Trucks. Report E061. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 2006.
16. Heavenrich R. M. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2006. Report EPA420-R-06-011. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, Mich., 2006.
18. Weiss M. A. Heywood J. B. Drake E. M. Schafer A. and Au Yeung F. F. On the Road in 2020. Energy Laboratory Report #MIT EL 00-003. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2000.
19. Onoda T. Efficiency Standards for Trucks in Japan. Presented at Windsor Workshop Transportation Technologies and Fuels Forum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 5, 2006.
20. Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1995. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 1995.
21. Greene D. L. and Schafer A. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Va., 2003.
22. The Northeast Heating Fuel Market: Assessment and Options. Report SR/OIAF/2000–03. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, 2000.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David L. Greene
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Transportation Research Center, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.
Paul N. Leiby
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Transportation Research Center, 2360 Cherahala Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932.
Philip D. Patterson
Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis, U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building (EE-3B), 1000 Independence Avenue, Southwest, Washington, DC 20585.
Steven E. Plotkin
Argonne National Laboratory, 955 L'Enfant Plaza, Southwest, Suite 6000, Washington, DC 20024.
Margaret K. Singh
Argonne National Laboratory, 955 L'Enfant Plaza, Southwest, Suite 6000, Washington, DC 20024.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 32

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Evaluating U.S. oil security and import reliance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Impacts of Variability in Cellulosic Biomass Yields on Energy Security
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Emperor Has No Clothes: The Limits of OPEC in the Global Oil Marke...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A landscape perspective on sustainability of agricultural systems
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Low carbon fuel policy and analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Measuring energy security: Can the United States achieve oil independe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Political Economy of Public Goods: Why Economists Should Care
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub