Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Macroeconomic Effects of Climate Policies on Road Transport: Efficiency Agreements Versus Fuel Taxation for the United Kingdom, 2000–2010

Abstract

This paper reports a study modeling climate policies in the United Kingdom for road transportation over the period 2000 to 2010. Estimates of the effects of fuel-economy policies are introduced into the energy-demand equation for transport in a top-down dynamic econometric model of the UK economy with 50 industrial sectors, MDM-E3. This allows estimation of the effects of the reduced energy use for the transport sector on demand (both in the United Kingdom and in the export markets). The model is solved as a counterfactual for 2000 to 2005 and as a projection for 2005 to 2010 in a series of scenarios that compare voluntary agreements in fuel economy improvements with UK fuel taxes giving the same reduction in CO2 emissions. The systemwide final energy reductions are estimated to be 2.9 million tons of oil equivalent, or 1.8%, of total final demand for energy by 2010. Voluntary agreements (VAs) were found to yield positive macroeconomic effects, with small increases in GDP and employment and small reductions in general inflation. In contrast, fuel taxes set at a level to achieve the same amount of CO2 reductions raise prices and lower gross domestic product (GDP) and employment. If fuel duties are recycled in the economy, reducing income taxes, then the undesirable macroeconomic impacts of fuel duties can be largely eliminated. To the extent that VAs are viewed by vehicle manufacturers as a substitute for mandated fuel economy improvements, it is possible to compare the relative effects of standards and taxes in the light-duty transport sector in reducing CO2 emissions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jaccard M. Loulou R. Kanudia A. Nyboer N. Bailie A. and Labriet M. Methodological Contrasts in Costing Greenhouse Gas Abatement Policies: Optimization and Simulation Modeling of Micro-Economic Effects in Canada. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, pp. 148–164.
2. McFarland J. R. Reilly J. M. and Herzog H. J. Representing Energy Technologies in Top-Down Models Using Bottom-Up Information. Energy Economics, Vol. 26, 2004, pp. 685–707.
3. Parry I. and Williams R. C. A Second-Best Evaluation of Eight Policy Instruments to Reduce Carbon Emissions. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 21, 1999, pp. 347–73.
4. Smulders S. A. and de Nooij M. The Impact of Energy Conservation on Technology and Economic Growth. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 25, 2003, pp. 59–79.
5. Pizer W. Burtraw D. Harrington W. Newell R. and Sanchirico J. Modeling Economywide versus Sectoral Climate Policies Using Combined Aggregate-Sectoral Models. Energy Journal, Vol. 27, 2006, pp. 135–168.
6. Sanstad A. Hanemann W. M. and Auffhammer M. End-Use Energy Efficiency in a “Post-Carbon” California Economy: Policy Issues and Research Frontiers, Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. California Climate Change Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
7. Roland-Holst D. Economic Assessment of Some California Greenhouse Gas Control Policies: Applications of the BEAR Model, Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. California Climate Change Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
8. Barker T. Ekins P. and Strachan N. Energy-Economy-Engineering-Environment: An E4 Representation of the UK Energy System. UKERC Working Paper. UK Energy Research Centre, London, 2005.
9. Barker T. Making the Cambridge Growth Project Model Dynamic. In Medium-Term Dynamic Forecasting (Gossling W. F., ed.), Input-Output Publishing Company, London, 1978.
10. Almon C. The INFORUM Approach to Interindustry Modeling. Economic Systems Research, Vol. 3, 1991, pp. 1–7.
11. Meyer B. The Economic-Environmental Model PANTA RHEI and its Application. Presented at Environment and Science—Concepts and Strategic Goals for the Future, Tokyo, 2005.
12. Climate Change: The U.K. Programme. U.K. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, London, 2000.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Terry Barker
Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 22 Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1QA, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Rubin
Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 28

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Connected Autonomous Vehicles: Travel Behavior and Energy Use
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub