Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Method for Assessing Safety of Routes in a Road Network

Abstract

In the Netherlands, the concept of sustainably safe traffic is the leading vision in road safety policy and research. The main goal of a sustainably safe road transport system is to reduce the annual number of road accident casualties to a fraction of the current levels. Important requirements resulting from this vision are that trips follow safe roads as much as possible, trips be as short as possible, and the quickest and safest routes coincide. Modeling route choice will provide answers to the planning issues of sustainably safe traffic; however, the safety effects of these requirements constitute a totally different issue, which needs to be dealt with. The focus of this study is on the design of a method that enables the planner to determine the safety effects of existing route choice and the changes in route choice. A description of road safety can be made in various ways. When a microscopic model is used, conflicts between vehicles will be an integral part of the simulation. The outcome will be used to compare the types of conflicts in a given simulation with the types of conflicts that would be acceptable in a sustainably safe road environment, for example, conflicts with opposing vehicles should be minimized at high speed differentials. A so-called route diagram of each route can be checked according to a series of criteria, each representing requirements for a sustainably safe route choice. Each criterion of the route diagram contributes to the total safety level of a route by the number of demerit points scored by the criterion. The criteria are described and tested in a microsimulation of alternative routes in a synthetic road network.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Koornstra M. J., Mathijssen M. P. M., Mulder J. A. G., Roszbach R., and Wegman F. C. M. Naar een duurzaam veilig wegverkeer: Nationale verkeersveiligheidsverkenning voor de jaren 1990/2010 (Towards a Sustainably Safe Traffic System: National Survey of Road Safety for 1990/2010). SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 1992.
2. Wegman F., and Aarts L. (eds.) Advancing Sustainable Safety. National Road Safety Outlook 2005–2020. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2006.
3. Handboek Categorisering wegen op duurzaam veilige basis; Deel I: Voorlopige Functionele en operationele eisen (Handbook Categorizing Roads on a Sustainable Safe Basis, Part I: Provisional Functional and Operational Requirements). Information and Technology Platform for Infrastructure, Traffic, Transport and Public Space (CROW), Ede, Netherlands, 1997.
4. Hummel T. Route Management in Safer Transportation Network Planning. Report D-2001-11. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2001.
5. Immers L. H., Wilmink I. R., and Stada J. E. Bypasses voor bereikbaarheid (Bypasses for Accessibility). TNO Report INRO-VV/2001-28. TNO Inro, Afdeling Verkeer en Vervoer (AVV), Delft, Netherlands, 2001.
6. Leidraad model- en evaluatiestudies benuttingsmaatregelen (Guidelines Model and Assessment Studies of Traffic Management). Rijkswaterstaat, AVV, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2002.
7. Wismans L. Simulatiemodellen. Internal Memo. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2003.
8. Hidas P. A Functional Evaluation of the AIMSUN, PARAMICS and VISSIM Microsimulation Models. Road and Transport Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2005, pp. 45–59.
9. Morsink P., Wismans L., and Dijkstra A. Preliminary Route Choice Analysis for a Sustainably Safe Traffic and Transport System. Proc., European Transport Conference 2004, Strasbourg, France, Oct. 2004.
10. van Minnen J. Geschikte grootte van verblijfsgebieden (Suitable Size of Residential Areas). Report R-99-25. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 1999.
11. Krabbenbos J., van Maarseveen M. F. A. M., and Zuidgeest M. H. P. Evaluating Access Road Network Structures for Built-Up Areas from a Sustainable Transport Perspective. In Urban Transport VIII (Sucharov L. J., and Brebbia C. A., eds.), WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2002.
12. Dijkstra A. Kwaliteitsaspecten van duurzaam-veilige weginfrastructuur (Quality Aspects of a Sustainably Safe Road Infrastructure). Report R-2003-10. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2003.
13. Janssen S. T. M. C. Safety Standards Based on Road Type. Proc., Third International Conference on Safety and the Environment in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Past, Shaping the Future, Tel Aviv, Israel, Nov. 7–10, 1994, pp. 79–88.
14. Janssen S. T. M. C. De verkeersveiligheidsverkenner gebruikt in de regio; de rekenmethode en de aannamen daarin (The Road Safety Explorer Used Regionally: The Calculation Method and Its Assumptions). -2005-6. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2005.
15. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways. Report FHWA-RD-99-207. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
16. Validation of Accident Models for Intersections. Report FHWA-RD-03-037. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
17. RIPCORD. Accident Prediction Models and Road Safety Impact Assessment: A State-of-the-Art. Ripcord-Iserest Consortium. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2006.
18. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. Report FHWA-RD-03-050. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
19. Hydén C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation. Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1987.
20. Svensson Å. A Method for Analysing the Traffic Process in a Safety Perspective. Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1998.
21. Minderhoud M. M., and Bovy P. H. L. Extended Time-to-Collision Measures for Road Traffic Safety Assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 33, 2001, pp. 89–97.
22. Drolenga H. Het ontwerp van een verkeersveiligheidsindicator van routes (Designing a Safety Indicator for Routes). MSc thesis. Twente University, Enschede, Netherlands, 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Atze Dijkstra
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Hans Drolenga
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, P.O. Box 1090, 2260 BB Leidschendam, Netherlands.
Martin van Maarseveen
Centre for Transport Studies, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 40

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 12

  1. Understanding the impact of vehicle dynamics, geometric and non-geomet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Traffic conflict prediction using connected vehicle data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Modeling traveler’s speed-route joint choice behavior with heterogeneo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Spatial Analysis to Identify Pedestrian Crash Zones: A Case Study of S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Predictive Models for Routing in Urban Distribution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Assessing the safety of routes in a regional network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Reducing Traffic Injuries Resulting from Excess Speed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Sensitivity analysis on heterogeneity of driving behavior for evacuati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Do Calculated Conflicts in Microsimulation Model Predict Number of Cra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Economic Incentives to Influence Drivers' Route Choices for Safety Enh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Mea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub