Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Impact of Designated Secure Rest Facilities on Single-Lane Truck-Dispatching Productivity

Abstract

This paper develops an approach for analyzing how restricting rest (sleep) locations for long-haul truckers may affect operational productivity, given hours-of-service regulations. Productivity is measured by the minimum number of unique drivers required to execute a set of load requests feasibly over a known planning horizon. When drivers may stop for rest at any location, they should be able to maximize utilization under regulated driving hours. When drivers may stop for rest only at certain discrete locations, drivers may suffer decreased utilization. The framework and results developed in this paper should be especially useful in the analysis of truck transportation of security-sensitive commodities, such as food products and hazardous materials, for which there exists strong external pressure to ensure that drivers rest only in secure locations to reduce risks of tampering. The analysis considers the simplest case, in which all loads to be transported move along a single lane. The paper presents an optimal tree search algorithm for determining the minimum number of drivers required to cover a set of loads given a set of allowed rest locations. Because the optimal approach is often computationally burdensome, the paper also presents and analyzes a set of simple heuristics for determining feasible load-to-driver assignments that can augment the search for the true minimum. Analysis of a sample data set demonstrates the approach and indicates that for lanes of realistic length, the productivity impact of restricting rest to a small number of discrete locations is likely to be small.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Brewster R., and Levert R. Identifying Vulnerabilities and Security Management Practices in Agricultural and Food Commodity Transportation. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2. Ervin E. C., and Harris R. C. Simulation Analysis of Truck Driver Scheduling Rules. Proc., 2004 Winter Simulation Conference (Ingalls R. G., Rossetti M. D., Smith J. S., and Peters B. A., eds.), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, N.J., 2004.
3. Powell W. B., Shapiro J. A., and Simao H. P. An Adaptive Dynamic Programming Algorithm for the Heterogeneous Resource Allocation Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 231–249.
4. Erera A. L., Karacik B., and Savelsbergh M. W. P. A Dynamic Driver Management Scheme for Less-than-Truckload Carriers. Computers and Operations Research (forthcoming).
5. Beujon G. J., and Turnquist M. A. A Model for Fleet Sizing and Vehicle Allocation. Transportation Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1991, pp. 19–45.
6. Du Y., and Hall R. Fleet Sizing and Empty Equipment Redistribution for Center-Terminal Transportation Networks. Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1997, pp. 145–157.
7. Vis I. F. A., de Koster R., and Roodbergen K. J. Determination of the Number of Automated Guided Vehicles Required at a Semi-Automated Container Terminal. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2001, pp. 409–417.
8. Vis I. F. A., de Koster R., and Savelsbergh M. W. P. Minimum Vehicle Fleet Size Under Time-Window Constraints at a Container Terminal. Transportation Science, Vol. 39, No. 2, May 2005, pp. 249–260.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Steven M. Morris
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Northwest, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205.
Alan L. Erera
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Northwest, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205.
Chelsea C. White, III
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, Northwest, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub