Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2007

Modeling Bus Lane Priorities in a Motorcycle Environment Using SATURN

Abstract

Bus lanes and median bus ways such as those in Curitiba, Brazil, and Bogotá, Colombia, are attracting a great deal of attention worldwide. For many Asian developing cities, there is an interest in how successfully bus lanes and bus rapid transit will function, given that traffic conditions in such cities typically are different from those found in Latin America. This paper addresses this issue for Asian cities whose traffic is dominated by motorcycles, concentrating particularly on Hanoi, Vietnam. With the use of a SATURN mesoscopic simulation model for Hanoi (with 322 junctions and 1,108 links), different bus lane–bus way designs are compared in regard to their effects on travel time savings. Results show that the level of motorcycle violations has an important impact on the success of bus lane schemes and that there is no significant speed improvement on bus lanes if enforcement is weak. Bus ways can achieve much higher bus speeds than can bus lanes, but general traffic speeds are likely to reduce them significantly if there is no mode switching from private modes to buses. In such circumstances the potential extra delay due to a poorly designed bus way is greater than that due to a poorly designed bus lane. The route-switching flexibility of motorcycles also has considerable effects on the performance of bus lanes and bus ways.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wright L. Bus Rapid Transit. Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities. Division 44, Module 3b. Eschborn, Germany, 2002.
2. Wright L. Mass Transit Options. Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities. Division 44, Module 3a. Eschborn, Germany, 2002.
3. Levinson H. S., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., Rutherford S., Smith R. L., Cracknell J., and Soberman R. TCRP Report No. 90: Bus Rapid Transit, Volume 1, Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
4. Levinson H. S., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., and Gast J. Bus Rapid Transit: Synthesis of Case Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1841, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1–11.
5. Levinson H. S., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., Gast J., Rutherford S., and Bruhn E. TCRP Report No. 90: Bus Rapid Transit, Volume 2, Implementation Guidelines. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
6. Making TransJakarta a World Class BRT System. Final recommendation. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New York, 2005. www.itdp.org/read/TransJakarta%20Final%20Report%205.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2006.
7. Tiwari G., Fazio J., and Pavitravas S. Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Passenger Car Units for Heterogeneous Traffic Using a Modified Density Method. Proc., 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Hawaii. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 246–257.
8. Maini P., and Khan S. Transportation Research Circular E-C018: Discharge Characteristics of Heterogeneous Traffic at Signalized Intersections. Proc., 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Hawaii. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. pp. 258–270.
9. Powell M. A Model to Represent Motorcycle Behaviour at Signalized Intersections Incorporating an Amended First Order Macroscopic Approach. Transportation Research Part A, No. 34, 2000, pp. 497–514.
10. Oketch T. G. New Modeling Approach for Mixed-Traffic Streams with Nonmotorized Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 61–69.
11. May A. D., and Montgomery F. O. Control of Congestion at Highly Saturated Signalized Intersections: Experiments on Rama 4 Road, Bangkok. Working paper 222. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K., 1986.
12. Lieberman E., and Rathi A. K. Chapter 10: Traffic Simulation. In Special Report 165: Traffic Simulation, Traffic Flow Theory. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 10-1–10-25.
13. Van Vliet D., and Wright I. SATURN User Manual 10.5, Leeds, U.K., 2005.
14. Hossain M., and McDonald M. Modeling the Impacts of Reducing Non-Motorised Traffic in Urban Corridors of Developing Cities. Transportation Research A 32, No 4, 1998, pp. 247–260.
15. Farzaneh M., and Rakha H. Procedures for Calibrating TRANSYT Platoon Dispersion Model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 7, 2006, pp. 548–554.
16. Transport Engineering Design, Inc. (TEDI). Plan for Public Transport System in Hanoi 2010 and 2020. Economics and Travel Demand Forecast, Hanoi People's Committee 2004, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2007
Issue published: January 2007

Rights and permissions

© 2007 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Minh Tranhuu
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 38 University Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Frank Montgomery
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 38 University Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Paul Timms
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 38 University Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 55

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Day-to-Day Dynamic Traffic Flow Assignment Model under Mixed Travel Mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluation of Bus Signal Priority and Dedicated Bus Lane for Efficienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Understanding the Performance of Exclusive Bus Lane Shared with Carpoo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Implementation of Bus Priority with Queue Jump Lane and Pre-Signal at ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Bi-Objective Optimization Approach for Exclusive Bus Lane Scheduling D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub