Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Six-Wave Odometer Panel for Evaluation of Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Programs

Abstract

A six-wave panel survey of household vehicle use in Adelaide, South Australia, and Melbourne, Victoria, was reviewed, with odometer readings as the key measurement. The study was conducted to explore the feasibility of using this method to evaluate the effectiveness of voluntary travel behavior change (VTBC) projects implemented at the household level. Odometer surveys are a practically feasible, publicly acceptable, and reliable method for measuring change in household vehicle use. The collection of odometer readings was chosen because it was a direct way to quantify distance traveled in private vehicles that was difficult to manipulate or misreport. The panel design was useful to minimize variation, and burden was reduced by keeping the task simple. Although the sample obtained may have been subject to coverage error, the demography of the sample is stable over time; this status indicates that there is no selective dropout from particular population segments. The data collected in this pilot suggest that sample sizes upwards of 1,000 households would be necessary to conclude with 95% confidence that an actual difference in daily vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) per vehicle of ±1 km was significantly different from zero. Although the data here show that the average daily VKT per household and per vehicle in Adelaide stayed stable for VTBC nonparticipants and dropped in participating VTBC households, the small sample size means it cannot be stated with statistical confidence whether this was significant.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Taylor M., and Ampt E. Travelling Smarter Down Under: Policies for Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change in Australia. Transport Policy, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 165–177.
2. TravelSmart Australia. Evaluation of Australian TravelSmart Projects in the ACT, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia: 2001–2005. Report to the Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra, and State TravelSmart Program Managers. www.travelsmart.gov.au/publications/pubs/evaluation-2005.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2008.
3. Ker I. Can Evaluating Be Too Prescriptive? Appraisal in the Age of the Triple Bottom Line. Presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference, Wollongong, Australia, 2002.
4. Ampt E. The Evaluation of Travel Behaviour Change Methods—A Significant Challenge. Presented at the 24th Australasian Research Forum, Hobart, Australia, 2001.
5. Stopher P., Greaves S., Xu M., and Lauer N. Stages 1.2 & 1.3 Development and Scoping of Options for Long-Term Monitoring of the NTBCP. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies for the National Travel Behaviour Change Partners, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2005.
6. Hawthorne G. The Effect of Different Methods of Collecting Data: Mail, Telephone and Filter Data Collection Issues in Utility Measurement. Quality of Life Research, Vol. 12, 2003, pp. 1081–1088.
7. Huang H-M. Do Print and Web Surveys Provide the Same Results? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 22, 2006, pp. 334–350.
8. Stopher P., Wilmot C., Stecher C., and Alsnih R. Household Travel Surveys: Proposed Standards and Guidelines. Presented to the 7th International Conference on Travel Survey Methods, Playa Herradura, Costa Rica, 2004.
9. Northwest Research Group. Puget Sound Transportation Panel Wave 10, October 2002–February 2003 Summary Report. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, Wash., 2003. www.psrc.org/publications/pubs/pstp_wave10.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2007.
10. Zumkeller D., Madre J. L., Chlond B., and Armoogum J. Panel Surveys. In Travel Survey Methods (Stopher P. R. and Stecher C., eds.), Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2006, pp. 363–398.
11. Ampt E., and Stopher P. Mixed Mode Data Collection in Travel Surveys: Challenges and Opportunities. Presented at the 28th Australasian Research Forum, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
12. Swann N., and Stopher P. The Impact of Offering Choice in Response Mode: A Comparison of Post, Telephone and Internet Respondents in a Multi-Mode Longitudinal Travel Survey. Presented at the ACSPRI Social Science Methodology Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Peter Stopher
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Natalie Swann
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Panel Data in Transportation Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Pain and Joy of a Panel Survey on Transport Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Continuous Mobility Surveys: The State of Practice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Lessons from an Overview of National Transport Surveys, from Working G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. THE OPTIMAL DURATION FOR A TRAVEL SURVEY
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub