Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Dual-Advisory Speed Signing on Freeway-to-Freeway Connectors in Texas

Abstract

This project recognizes the disparity in the relationship between truck and passenger car speeds and current advisory speed-signing practices. The results of this project provide a mechanism that traffic engineers may use to provide enhanced differential warning to trucks and passenger vehicles at freeway connector ramps. The strong evidence of a significant differential between the speeds that cars and heavy trucks can comfortably and safely traverse freeway connector ramps or loops revealed a need for further research. This research would investigate current advisory speed-signing practices and examine whether a dual-advisory speed-signing scheme, one that provides different recommended advisory speeds for trucks and passenger vehicles, can safely address this differential. On the basis of the results of the analysis of average and 85th-percentile speeds at the midpoint of each study curve, the dual-advisory warning signs had a positive impact on reducing speeds at the point of curvature on the curve and had an accompanying reduction in speed-related crashes at the study sites, or both.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Voigt A. P., Fenno D. W., and Borchardt D. W. Evaluation of Vehicle Speeds on Freeway-to-Freeway Connector Ramps in Houston. Research Report No. 4318-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Houston, 2003.
2. A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.
3. Harwood D. W., and Mason J. M. Jr. Horizontal Curve Design for Passenger Cars and Trucks. In Transportation Research Record 1445, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 22–33.
4. McGee H. W., and Strickland R. R. An Automatic Warning System to Prevent Truck Rollover on Curved Ramps. Public Roads, Vol. 57, No. 4, 1994, pp. 17–22.
5. Impact of Specific Geometric Features on Truck Operations and Safety at Interchanges. FHWA-RD-86-057. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1986.
6. Olson P. L., Fancher P. S., Bareket Z., Gattle D. S., Aoki T., Sato T., Traube E. C., and Pettis L. S. An Evaluation of Freeway Ramp Advisory Speed Signs for Trucks. Report UMTRI-91-40. Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1991.
7. Harwood D. W., Mason J. M., Glauz W. D., Kulakowski B. T., and Fitzpatrick K. Truck Characteristics for Use in Highway Design and Operation, Vol. I. FHWA-RD-89-226. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1990.
8. Fitzpatrick K., Blaschke J. D., Shamburger C. B., Krammes R. A., and Fambro D. B. Compatibility of Design Speed, Operating Speed and Posted Speed. FHWA-TX-95-1465-2F. Texas Transportation Institute, Houston, 1995.
9. Merritt D. R. Safe Speeds on Curves: A Historical Perspective of the Ball-Bank Indicator. ITE Journal, Sept. 1988, pp. 15–19.
10. Moyer R. A., and Berry D. S. Marking Highway Curves with Safe Speed Indicators. Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 20, 1940, pp. 399–428.
11. Safe Curve Speed Study. Florida Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2000, pp. 11-1–11-6.
12. Carlson P. J., and Mason J. M. Jr. Relationships Between Ball Bank Indicator Readings, Lateral Acceleration Rates, and Vehicular Body-Roll Rates. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1658, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 34–42.
13. Chowdhury M. A., Warren D. L., Bissell H., and Taori S. Evaluation of Criteria for Setting Advisory Speed on Curves. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
14. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Rev. 1. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2004.
15. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2006.
16. Ervin R. D., MacAdam C. C., and Barnes M. Influence of the Geometric Design of Highway Ramps on the Stability and Control of Heavy-Duty Trucks. In Transportation Research Record 1052, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 77–89.
17. Roadway Geometry and TS&W Regulations, Working Paper 5. Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, Phase I—Synthesis, Battelle Team, Columbus, Ohio, 1995.
18. Geometric Design and Operational Considerations for Trucks. IR-062. ITE, Washington, D.C., 1992.
19. Janson B. N., Awad W., Robles J., Kononov J., and Pinkerton B. Truck Crashes at Freeway Ramps: Data Analysis and High-Risk Site Identification. Journal of Transportation Statistics, 1998, pp. 75–98.
20. Freedman M., Olson P. L., and Zador P. L. Speed Actuated Rollover Advisory Signs for Trucks on Highway Exit Ramps. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Ruckersville, Va., 1992.
21. Garber N., Chowdhury M. A., and Kalaputapu R. Crash Characteristics of Large Trucks on Highway Ramps. Foundation for Traffic Safety, American Automobile Association, Washington, D.C., 1992.
22. Harkey D. L., and Mera R. Safety Impacts of Different Speed Limits on Cars and Trucks. FHWA-RD-93-161. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1994.
23. Hall J. W., and Dickinson L. V. An Operational Evaluation of Truck Speeds on Interstate Highways. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 1974.
24. Dixon M. Evaluation of the Impacts of Reducing Truck Speeds on Interstate Highways in Idaho, Phase III. Final Report N00-07. National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology, University of Idaho, Moscow, 2000.
25. Virginia Transportation Research Council. The Safety Impacts of Differential Speed Limits on Rural Interstate Highways. FHWA-HRT-04-156. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2004.
26. Garber N. J., and Gadiraju R. Impact of Differential Speed Limits on Highway Speeds and Accidents. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1991.
27. Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003 ed. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin.
28. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
29. DeVore J. L. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 5th ed. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif., 2000.
30. Mooney C. Z., and Duval R. D. Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1993.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anthony P. Voigt
Texas Transportation Institute, 701 North Post Oak, Suite 430, Houston, TX 77024.
Charles R. Stevens, Jr.
LJA Engineering & Surveying, Inc., 2929 Briarpark Drive, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77042.
Darrell W. Borchardt
Texas Transportation Institute, 701 North Post Oak, Suite 430, Houston, TX 77024.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 20

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Safety Evaluation of Freeway Exit Ramps with Advisory Speed Reductions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The influence of landscape intervention used as an alertness maintaini...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Impacts of experimental advisory exit speed sign on traffic speeds for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Examination of the reliability of the crash modification factors using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Exploration of sample quantiles and mean speed distributions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Noise variance comparison for linear network equalizer and non-linear ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Statistical Test for 85th and 15th Percentile Speeds with Asymptotic D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub