Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Productive Efficiency of World Container Ports: A Global Perspective

Abstract

This study evaluates the productive efficiency of 140 global hub and national gateway container ports in almost all countries of the world for the years 1991 and 2004. It adopts diverse models of data envelopment analysis (DEA), including two specific cases of DEA window analysis: intertemporal and contemporaneous. The study finds that world ports have experienced inter- and intraregional efficiency gaps, which have not lessened over time. In general, the larger-scale ports are more efficient because they drive technological development and adopt better managerial practices. However, many large ports operate under decreasing returns-to-scale at each port level. This implies a potential for interport competition as a way to increase port efficiency at an aggregated regional level. In addition, port size is not the sole factor in determining port efficiency. Newly developed ports in Asia and the Middle East and small Central American ports operate efficiently. They have created strong partnerships with emerging, globally franchised terminal operators. With small hinterlands, Oceanian ports have tried to improve efficiency by reforming institutional structures and managerial practices. However, they have not fully overcome the disadvantages of the lack of economies of scale. For them, interport competition may not be an effective means to improve efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York, 2002.
2. Trade and Development. Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries: Transport Round-table, Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
3. Efficient Transport and Trade Facilitation to Improve Participation by Developing Countries in International Trade. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Commission on Enterprise, Business Facilitation and Development, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
4. Lewis B. M., Erera A. L., and White C.C. III. Impact of Temporary Seaport Closures on Freight Supply Chain Costs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1963, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 64–70.
5. International Performance Indicators in the Waterfront. Research Report 47, Australian Bureau of Industry Economics, Canberra, Australia, 1993.
6. International Benchmarking of the Australian Waterfront. Research Report, AusInfo, Australian Productivity Commission, Canberra, Australia, April 1998.
7. Farrell M. J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistic Society A, Vol. 120, 1957, pp. 253–281.
8. Fare R., Grosskopf S., and Lovell C. A. K. Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1994.
9. Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., and Zhu J. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass., 2004.
10. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass., 2003, p. 4.
11. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, 1978, pp. 429–444.
12. Banker R. D., Charnes A., and Cooper W. W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, Vol. 30, 1984, pp. 1078–1092.
13. Roll Y., and Hayuth Y. Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1993, pp. 153–161.
14. Martinez E., Diaz R., Navarro M., and Ravelo T. A Study of the Efficiency of Spanish Port Authorities Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 237–253.
15. Tongzon J. Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2001, pp. 107–122.
16. Valentine V. F., and Gray R. The Measurement of Port Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Proc., 9th World Conference on Transportation Research (CD-ROM), Seoul, South Korea, July 2001, pp. 22–27.
17. Marlow P. B., and Paixao Casaca A.C. Measuring Lean Ports Performance. International Journal of Transport Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2003, pp. 189–202.
18. Wang T., Song D. W., and Cullinane K. The Applicability of Data Envelopment Analysis to Efficiency Measurement of Container Ports. Proc., International Association of Maritime Economists Conference (CD-ROM), Panama, Nov. 2002, pp. 13–15.
19. Kumbhakar S. C., and Lovell C. K. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000.
20. Cullinane K., Song D. W., Ji P., and Wang T.-F. An Application of DEA Windows Analysis to Container Port Production Efficiency. Review of Network Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2004, pp. 184–206.
21. Tongzon J. Determinants of Port Performance and Efficiency. Transportation Research A, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1995, pp. 245–252.
22. Turner H., Windle R., and Dresner M. North American Containerport Productivity: 1984–1997. Transportation Research E, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2004, pp. 339–356.
23. Cullinane K., Ji P., and Wang T. The Relationship Between Privatization and DEA Estimates of Efficiency in the Container Port Industry. Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2005, pp. 433–462.
24. Dowd T. J., and Leschine T. M. Container Terminal Productivity: A Perspective. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, 1990, pp. 107–112.
25. Notteboom T., Coeck C., and van den Broeck J. Measuring and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals by Means of Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Models. International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol. 2, 2000, pp. 83–106.
26. Major Container Terminals Structure and Performances Report. Marconsult, Genoa, Italy, 1994.
27. Tongzon J., and Heung W. Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals). Transportation Research A, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2005, pp. 405–424.
28. Containerisation International Online. Containerisation International, Informa Group PLC, London, 2004.
29. Containerisation International Yearbook. Containerisation International, Informa Group PLC, London, 1992.
30. Ports and Terminals Guide. Lloyd's Register Fairplay, Ltd., Miami, Fla., 2005.
31. Cook W. D., and Zhu J. Modeling Performance Measurement: Applications and Implementations Issues in DEA. Springer, New York, 2005.
32. Bytnar L., Chiu A., Frommann I., Gruwell L., Guttman L., and Morgan W. Port of Pittsburgh Practicum Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1782, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 11–22.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

SangHyun Cheon
Department of Supply Chain Management, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 874706, Tempe, AZ 85287-4706.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 69

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 12

  1. In practice and in principle: ‘Free market’ discourses and container p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Comparative analysis of port efficiency in Yangtze River Delta and Pea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Window data envelopment analysis approach: A review and bibliometric a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Analysing Energy Efficiency of Rail and Road Transport in Pakistan Thr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidenc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The effects of consolidation and privatization of ports in proximity: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Environmental efficiency analysis of Chinese container ports with CO 2...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Measuring Variability in Freeway Traffic States Using Real-time Loop D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Estimation of Optimal Handling Capacity of a Container Port: An Econom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Evaluating Freeway Traffic Conditions by Data Envelopment Analysis Usi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Supply Chain Coordination for Port Sustainability...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub