Use of Global Positioning System to Identify Crash Locations in South Carolina
Abstract
To overcome some of the issues with geocoding crash data based on traditional location referencing systems (i.e., route and distance to intersection, route and milepoint, or both), the South Carolina Department of Transportation purchased Global Positioning System (GPS) units for all enforcement agencies in South Carolina responsible for reporting crashes. Reporting officers were instructed to use the GPS units to determine coordinate location data for recording on the crash report. Some of the problems experienced when trying to geocode 3 years (2004 to 2006) of crash data for use in safety analysis are discussed. Overall, approximately 80% of the crash records were located within reasonable levels of accuracy. Trends in the errors over the 3 years indicate a potential for targeted training to significantly reduce error. Recommendations are provided to help improve the success rate of the geocoding process. These recommendations focus on training officers and data entry personnel, designing data entry filters, and possibly changing the crash report form.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. GIS-Based Crash Referencing and Analysis System, HSIS Summary Report. FHWA 99-081. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, February 1999.
2. Safety Management Systems: Good Practices for Development and Implementation. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.
3. Pfefer R., Raub R., and Lucke R. Highway Safety Data: Costs, Quality, and Strategies for Improvement, Final Report. FHWA-RD-96-192. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 1998.
4. Hughes W. E., Reinfurt D., Yohanan D., Rouchon M., and McGee H. W. New and Emerging Technologies for Improving Accident Data Collection. FHWA-RD-92-097. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993.
5. Pfefer R. C., Neuman T. R., and Raub R. A. NCHRP Report 430: Improved Safety Information to Support Highway Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1999.
6. National Model: Statewide Application of Data Collection and Management Technology to Improve Highway Safety. FHWA-RD-99-140. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
7. Smith R., Harkey D., and Harris B. Implementation of GIS-Based Highway Safety Analysis: Bridging the Gap. FHWA-RD-01-039. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 2001. www.tfhrc.gov/safety/1039.htm. Accessed October 28, 2005.
8. Ogle J. H. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 367: Technologies for Improving Safety Data. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
9. Alewelt B. Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals: Application for Best Practices Recognition 2004. In Mobile Capture and Reporting System. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/perform/Pages/Best%/20Practices/ATSIP2003.htm. Accessed July 31, 2005.
10. National Model: Statewide Application of Data Collection and Management Technology to Improve Highway Safety: TraCS, Traffic and Criminal Software. Motor Vehicle Division, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa, Aug. 19, 2003. www.dot.state.ia.us/natmodel/tracs.htm. Accessed July 29, 2005.
11. Delucia B. H., and Scopatz R. A. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 350: Crash Records Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
12. Green E., and Agent K. Evaluation of the Accuracy of GPS as a Method of Locating Traffic Collisions. Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington, Ky., 2004. www.ktc.uky.edu/Reports/KTC_04_08_SPR_276_04_1F.pdf.
13. McKnight A., Mosher C., and Bozak D. Evaluation of Emerging Technologies for Traffic Crash Reporting. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998. ntl.bts.gov/lib/000/700/766/695.pdf.
14. Sando T., Mussa R., Sobanjo J., and Spainhour L. GPS Usability in Crash Location. Presented at ITE 2004 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Aug. 1–4, 2004; Lake Buena Vista, Fla., 2004.
15. Hughes R., and Stanard M. North Carolina's Experimental Use of GPS to Provide an “Integrated” GIS Analysis for Truck Involved Crash and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Activity. Crime Mapping News, Police Foundation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004, pp. 4–7.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 30
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 3
- Assessment of Crash Location Accuracy in Electronic Crash Reporting S...
- Reconstruction of Car Crash Scenes Using a 3D Building and Query Algeb...
- Geocoding police collision report data from California: a comprehensiv...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
