Methodology of Hinterland Strategy Selection for Container Port Based on GE Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS: Case of Lianyungang Port in China
Abstract
Hinterland strategy selection is used to determine a sound marketing plan and resource allocation for ports in their own hinterlands to compete for container traffic. There are three types of hinterland strategies that ports can employ: expansive strategy, maintenance strategy, and recovery strategy. The aim of this paper is to develop a decision-making methodology for container ports to establish a logical international container hinterland strategy under a fuzzy environment based on the business strength and industry attractiveness matrix (GE matrix) and fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), in which the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistics variables parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. This methodology took the attractiveness of international container hinterland units and a port's relative strength in every hinterland unit as the main assessing dimension to select a hinterland strategy. A fuzzy TOPSIS approach was used to evaluate the attractiveness of every international container hinterland unit and a port's relative competition in every hinterland unit. Furthermore, the GE matrix was erected to determine the hinterland strategy for a container port in every hinterland unit. Finally, the approach was demonstrated using the case of Lianyungang Port, China, which involved 30 international container hinterland units and 27 evaluation criteria. The application of a practical case indicates that this approach can provide effective decision support for container ports to establish an international container hinterland strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Li J.-A., Leung S. C. H., Wu Y., and Liu K. Allocation of Empty Containers Between Multi-Ports. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 182, 2007, pp. 400–412.
2. Van de Voorde E., and Winkelmans W. A General Introduction to Port Competition and Management. In Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports (Huybrechts M., Meersman H., Van de Voorde E., Van Hooydonk E., Verbeke A., and Winkelmans W., eds.), De Boeck Ltd., Antwerp, Belgium, 2002, pp. 1–16.
3. Slack B. Containerisation, Inter-Port Competition and Port Selection. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 12, 1985, pp. 293–303.
4. Robinson R. Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Chain Systems: The New Paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 241–255.
5. Malchow M., and Kanafani A. A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 28, 2001, pp. 265–277.
6. Haezendonck E., and Notteboom T. The Competitive Advantage of Seaports. In Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports (Huybrechts M., Meersman M., Van de Voorde E., Van Hooydonk E., Verbeke A., and Winkelmans W., eds.), De Boeck Ltd., Antwerp, Belgium, 2002, pp. 67–87.
7. Song D.-W. Regional Container Port Competition and Co-Operation: The Case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 99–108.
8. Perez-Labajos C., and Blanco B. Competitive Policies for Commercial Sea Ports in EU. Marine Policy, Vol. 28, 2004, pp. 553–556.
9. Wei Y. Y., and Lam J. S. L. Competition Dynamics Between Container Ports in East Asia. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 35–51.
10. Hoyle B., and Charlier J. Inter-Port Competition in Developing Countries: An East African Case Study. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1995, pp. 87–100.
11. Haynes K. E., Hsing Y. M., and Stough R. R. Regional Port Dynamics in the Global Economy: The Case of Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 93–113.
12. Lu Y. B., Yang W. R., Wang R. H., and Yao Z. B. A Study of Evaluation on Competition Power for Main Container Transportation Harbors in China. Journal of Northern Jaotong University, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002, pp. 102–105. (in Chinese).
13. Wang J., Yang Z., and Lu C. F. Two New Methods for Partitioning Port Hinterland. Navigation of China, No. 3, 2005, pp. 57–61 (in Chinese).
14. Lang Y., and Li P. A Few Theories Problem of the Integration on Port-Innerland Economy. Economic Geography, 2005, pp. 767–770 (in Chinese).
15. Dong J. S., and Fan B. Q. Locational Quotient Used in the Analyses of Port Hinterland. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, No. 3, 2002, pp. 50–53.
16. Yang J. Q. Gravity Model for Partitioning Port Hinterlands Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, No. 2, 2002, pp. 123–126 (in Chinese).
17. Xu Y. F. The New Methods of Port Economic Hinterland Rational Distribution and Co-Ordinate Distribution. Fourth Asia Pacific Sustainable Development of Transport and Environment Technology Conference. China Communications Press, Beijing, 2005, pp. 659–665 (in Chinese).
18. Fang R. X. Shandong Peninsula Container Port Cooperation Model. A thesis. Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China, 2006 (in Chinese).
19. Shen L. Analysis of the Shanghai Port Container Transport Development Strategy Based on the SWOT. MA thesis. Hehai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, 2006 (in Chinese).
20. Li G. F. Study on Lianyungang Port Hinterland of the North Jiangsu Container Supply. Containerization, No. 5, 2005, pp. 26–27 (in Chinese).
21. Liu B., Zhu C. G., and Che Q. J. Lianyungang Port Economic Hinterland Space Evolution and Its Influencing Factors. China Ports, No. 2, 2007, pp. 36–39 (in Chinese).
22. Gu H. Building Container Hub Port for Lianyungang. Shipping Management, No. 1, 2007, pp. 19–21 (in Chinese).
23. Zeng J. G., Su Y. Q., and Guo C. H. A Study on the Application of Fuzzy Neural Network Method in Business Strategy Selection. Chinese Journal of Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 8, Special Issue, 2000, pp. 219–228 (in Chinese).
24. Zhang Y., Li X. H., Mao H. J., and Xu Y. N. Study on the Methodology of the Strategy Selection for the Road Freight Enterprise to Develop Modern Logistics. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2005, pp. 154–161 (in Chinese).
25. Wang T.-C., and Chang T.-H. Application of TOPSIS in Evaluating Initial Training Aircraft Under a Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 33, 2007, pp. 870–880.
26. Hwang C. L., and Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
27. Parkan Celik, and Wu Ming-Lu. Decision-Making and Performance Measurement Models with Applications to Robot Selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 36, 1999, pp. 503–523.
28. Jee D.-H., and Kang K.-J. A Method for Optimal Material Selection Aided with Decision Making Theory. Materials and Design, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 199–206.
29. Feng C. M., and Wang R.-T. Performance Evaluation for Airlines Including the Consideration of Financial Ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 6, 2000, pp. 133–142.
30. Benitez J. M., Martin J. C., and Román C. Using Fuzzy Number for Measuring Quality of Service in the Hotel Industry. Tourism Management, Vol. 28, 2007, pp. 544–555.
31. Chena C.-T., Linb C.-T., and Huang S.-F. A Fuzzy Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 102, 2006, pp. 289–301.
32. Wang Y. M., Kuo M.-S., Tzeng G. H., and Huang W.-C. A Note on Group Decision-Making Based on Concepts of Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points in a Fuzzy Environment. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 45, Nos. 3–4, 2007, pp. 324–339.
33. Jahanshahloo G. R., Lotfi F. H., and Izadikhah M. Extension of the TOPSIS Method for Decision-Making Problems with Fuzzy Data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 181, 2006, pp. 1544–1551.
34. Wang Y. M., and Elhag T. M. S. Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on Alpha Level Sets with an Application to Bridge Risk Assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 31, 2006, pp. 309–319.
35. Chen C. T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, No. 114, 2000, pp. 1–9.
36. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, No. 1, 1978, pp. 3–28.
37. Chen S. H., and Hwang C. L. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; Heidelberg, Germany; and New York, 1992, pp. 465–486.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 44
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 1
- Application of FMCDM model to selecting the hub location in the marine...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
