Accessible Pedestrian Signals at Complex Intersections: Effects on Blind Pedestrians
Abstract
Pedestrians with vision impairments often have to cross streets at unfamiliar signalized intersections. The results are reported of research on crossings by blind pedestrians at complex intersections before and after the installation of accessible pedestrian signals (APS) and again following the installation of innovative device features. Objective data on measures of street crossing performance by 56 participants were obtained at four intersections, two each in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Portland, Oregon. The analysis includes broad measures of crossing timing, wayfinding, and independence. After APS installation, delay in starting to cross was reduced by approximately 2 s, and there was significant improvement in independently determining a safe time to cross, beginning to cross during the “Walk” signal, and completing crossings before the onset of perpendicular traffic. Some measures of wayfinding and related measures of independence also improved in Portland. Additional device features introduced after the first postinstallation testing session led to additional improvements in wayfinding during a second postinstallation test in Charlotte.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Tauchi M. Sawai H. Takato J. Yoshiura T. and Takeuchi K. Development and Evaluation of a Novel Type of Audible Traffic Signal for the Blind Pedestrians. In Proc., The 9th International Mobility Conference, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Decatur, Ga., 1998, pp. 108–109.
2. Hill E. and Ponder P. Orientation and Mobility Techniques: A Guide for the Practitioner. American Foundation for the Blind, New York, 1976.
3. Guth D. and Rieser J. Perception and the Control of Locomotion by Blind and Visually Impaired Pedestrians. In Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 2nd ed. (Blasch B. Wiener W. and Welsh R., eds.), American Foundation for the Blind Press, New York, 1997.
4. Bentzen B. L. Barlow J. M. and Franck L. Addressing Barriers to Blind Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections. ITE Journal, Vol. 70, No. 9, pp. 32–35.
5. Carroll J. and Bentzen B. L. Survey of Signalized Intersection Accessibility. The Braille Forum, Vol. 38, Jan. 2000, pp. 11–15.
6. Bentzen B. L. Barlow J. M. and Bond T. Challenges of Unfamiliar Signalized Intersections for Pedestrians Who Are Blind: Research on Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 51–57.
7. Marston J. R. and Golledge R. G. Towards an Accessible City: Removing Functional Barriers for the Blind and Vision Impaired: A Case for Auditory Signs. University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2000.
8. Bentzen B. L. Crandall W. F. and Myers L. Wayfinding System for Transportation Services: Remote Infrared Audible Signage for Transit Stations, Surface Transit, and Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1671, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 19–26.
9. Williams M. D. Van Houten R. Ferraro J. and Blasch B. Field Comparison of Two Types of Accessible Pedestrian Signals. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 91–98.
10. Barlow J. M. Bentzen B. L. and Bond T. Blind Pedestrians and the Changing Technology and Geometry of Signalized Intersections: Safety, Orientation and Independence. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 99, No. 10 2005, pp. 587–598.
11. Wall R. S. Ashmead D. H. Bentzen B. L. and Barlow J. Directional Guidance from Audible Pedestrian Signals for Street Crossing. Ergonomics, Vol. 47, No. 12 2004, pp. 1318–1338.
12. Ashmead D. H. Wall R. S. Bentzen B. L. and Barlow J. M. Which Crosswalk? Effects of Accessible Pedestrian Signal Characteristics. ITE Journal, Vol. 74, No. 9 2004, pp. 26–31.
13. Scott A. C. Myers L. Barlow J. M. and Bentzen B. L. Accessible Pedestrian Signals: The Effect of Push-Button Location and Audible “Walk” Indications on Pedestrian Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 69–76.
14. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003, Part 4: Highway Traffic Signals, Ch. 4E.09.
15. Jacobson W. The Art and Science of Teaching Orientation and Mobility. American Foundation for the Blind Press, New York, 1993.
16. Crouse R. J. and Bina M. J. The Administration of Orientation and Mobility Programs for Children and Adults. In Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 2nd ed. (Blasch B. Wiener W. and Welsh R., eds.), American Foundation for the Blind Press, New York, 1997.
17. Bentzen B. L. Scott A. C. and Barlow J. M. Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Effect of Device Features. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1982, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 30–37.
18. Noyce D. A. and Bentzen B. L. Determination of Pedestrian PushButton Activation Duration at Typical Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 63–68.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 126
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 14
- Mapping the importance of specific physical elements in urban space fo...
- Disability and pedestrian road traffic injury: A scoping review
- An Intersection Database Facilitates Access to Complex Signalized Inte...
- To Veer or Not to Veer: Learning from Experts How to Stay Within the C...
- Wayfinding Problems for Blind Pedestrians at Noncorner Crosswalks: Nov...
- Wayfinding Technologies for Older Adults with Visual Impairments: Idea...
- Methods of Crossing at Roundabouts for Visually Impaired Pedestrians: ...
- Far-Side Audible Beaconing of Accessible Pedestrian Signals...
- Using a Smartphone Application to Support Visually Impaired Pedestrian...
- Effectiveness of Audible and Tactile Heading Cues at Complex Intersect...
- To Go or Not to Go...
- Nonvisual Cues for Aligning to Cross Streets
- Walking between the Lines: Nonvisual Cues for Maintaining Headings dur...
- Psychoacoustical Estimation of Selected Acoustic Signals Which Can Be ...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
