Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Comparison between Powered Two-Wheeler and Passenger Car Free-Flow Speeds in Urban Areas

Abstract

Accident data indicate that motorcyclists are a particularly vulnerable group of road users because they run a higher risk of being injured or killed in an accident than passenger car drivers. One of the countermeasures that can improve traffic safety for motorcyclists is an increase in awareness and knowledge about powered two-wheelers (PTWs) in the planning, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and existing roads. Road design standards and policies that regulate design process and safety evaluations are usually based on passenger car characteristics only. In particular, the passenger car operating speed is used as the critical input for design choices of geometric elements connected with traffic safety and as a performance measure to evaluate road design and consistency. Because the passenger car operating speed might not be representative of the PTW operating speed, this study compared the PTW and passenger car speed distributions in urban areas to establish definitively whether they are similar. The results showed that PTW speeds are always considerably higher than passenger car speeds and that the corresponding operating speeds are correlated. Therefore, a prediction equation to estimate the PTW operating speed starting from passenger car operating speed was developed for urban streets. This equation can help highway engineers to estimate expected PTW speeds that can be effectively used in the safety evaluations of new and existing roads where the significant presence of PTWs in the traffic flow suggests that this vehicle type should be considered.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Motorcycle Safety Program. Report DOT-HS-809-539. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. Billheimer J. W. Bednar F. McRea K. Sabol S. A. Syner J. and Thom D. R. Motorcycle Safety. In Transportation in the New Millennium (CD–ROM), TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
3. Billheimer J. W. Evaluation of California Motorcyclist Safety Program. In Transportation Research Record 1640, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 100–109.
4. Deutermann W. V. Calculating Lives Saved by Motorcycle Helmets. Report DOT-HS-809-861. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2005.
5. AP-11.15/99: Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 15: Motorcycle Safety. Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 1999.
6. MC Safety. Design and Operation of Roads and Traffic Systems. Norway Public Roads Administration, Oslo, 2004.
7. Handboek gemotoriseerde tweewielers. Een handreiking voor veilig wegontwerp, wegonderhoud en wegbeheer. CROW, Ede, Netherlands, 2003.
8. Guidelines for Motorcycling: Improving Safety Through Engineering and Integration. Institute of Highway Incorporated Engineers, London, 2005.
9. Prise en Compte des Motocyclistes dans L'Aménagement et la Gestion des Infrastructures. Service d'études Techniques des Routes et Auto-routes, Ministère de l'équipement et des Transports, Bagneux, France, 2000.
10. Forke E. and Gajewski R. Motorradfreundlicher Straßenbau—Praxisheft 6. Institut für Zweiradsicherheit, Essen, Germany, 2003.
11. Guidelines for PTW-Safer Road Design in Europe. Association des Constructeurs Européens de Motocycles, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
12. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington D.C., 2001.
13. ACEM Yearbook 2006 Facts and Figures on PTWs in Europe. Association des Constructeurs Européens de Motocycles, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
14. VIII rapporto Due Ruote ACI-CENSIS 2006. ACI and CENSIS, Rome, 2006.
15. European Road Statistics 2006. European Union Road Federation and International Road Federation, Brussels Programme Centre, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
16. Rilievi di Traffico e Monitoraggio delle Condizioni di Circolazione—Comune di Trieste. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy, 2002.
17. National Transportation Statistics 2006. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2007.
18. Statistica Degli Incidenti Stradali Anni 2003–2004 Edizione Provvisoria. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Rome, 2005.
19. Traffic Safety Facts 2004. Report DOT-HS-809-919. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2004.
20. Shankar U. and Varghese C. Recent Trends in Fatal Motorcycle Crashes: An Update. Report DOT-HS-810-606. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2006.
21. Yannis G. Golias J. Spyropoulou I. and Papadimitriou E. Mobility Patterns of Motorcycle and Moped Riders in Greece. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
22. Kallberg V. P. The Two Effects of Speed on Accidents: Number and Severity. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
23. Preusser D. Williams A. F. and Ulmer R. G. Analysis of Fatal Motorcycle Crashes: Crash Typing. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 6 1995, pp. 845–851.
24. Shibata A. and Fukuda K. Risk Factors of Fatality in Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 3 1994, pp. 391–397.
25. Savolainen P. and Mannering F. Probabilistic Models of Motorcyclists’ Injury Severities in Single- and Multi-Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 5 2007, pp. 955–963.
26. Liu C. Chen C. Subramanian R. and Utter D. Analysis of Speeding-Related Fatal Motor Vehicles Traffic Crashes. Report DOT-HS-809-839. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2005.
27. Shankar U. Fatal Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Crashes. Report DOT-HS-809-360. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2001.
28. Vis A. A. In-Depth Study of the Hazards of Motorcycling: A Description of the Nature and Size of the Problem. Report R-95-69. SWOV (Institute for Road Safety Research), Leidschendam, Netherlands, 1995.
29. MAIDS In-Depth Investigations of Accidents Involving Powered Two Wheelers, Final Report 1.2. Association des Constructeurs Européens de Motocycles, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
30. Brenac T. Clabaux N. Perrin C. and Van Elslande P. Motorcyclist Conspicuity-Related Accidents in Urban Areas: A Speed Problem? Advances in Transportation Studies: An International Journal, Vol. 8, 2006, pp. 23–29.
31. Noordzij P. Forke E. Brendicke R. and Chinn B. P. Integration of Needs of Mopeds and Motorcycle Riders into Safety Measures. Report D-2001-5. SWOV (Institute for Road Safety Research), Leidschendam, Netherlands, 2001.
32. Horswill M. S. and Helman S. A Behavioral Comparison Between Motorcyclists and a Matched Group of Non-Motorcycling Car Drivers: Factors Influencing Accident Risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 4 2003, pp. 589–597.
33. Vehicle Speeds in Great Britain 2005. Transport Statistic Bulletin SB(06)21. Transport Statistics, Department for Transport, London, 2006.
34. Su J.-M. Wu C.-H. and Hung C.-Y. Traffic Characteristics of Motorcycles on Tangent Sections of Expressways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1969, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 126–133.
35. Fitzpatrick K. Carlson P. Brewer M. A. Wooldridge M. D. and Miaou S. NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
36. Wang J. Dixon K. K. Li H. and Hunter M. P. Operating-Speed Model for Low-Speed Urban Tangent Streets Based on In-Vehicle Global Positioning System Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1961, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 24–33.
37. Poe C. M. and Mason J. M. Jr. Analyzing Influence of Geometric Design on Operating Speeds Along Low-Speed Urban Streets: Mixed-Model Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1737, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 18–25.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paolo Perco
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trieste, p.le Europa 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 40

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Real use of vehicle dynamic capacities: Motorcyclists versus motorists
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Analysis of the Impact of Pedestrian Crossing Activity on the Traffic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Real use of vehicle dynamic capacities: Motorcyclists versus motorists
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Speed Models for Motorcycle Riders for Two-lane Rural Roads
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of Vehicular Pedestrian Interaction at Urban Undesignated Mid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Modeling Speed and Capacity Estimation at Urban Midblock Sections unde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A new methodology for approaching motorcycle riders’ behavior at curve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Speed Prediction Models for Urban Arterials Under Mixed Traffic Condit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Contribution to the Investigation of Motorcyclists’ Speed Prediction E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub