Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Split-Cycle Offset Optimization Technique and Coordinated Actuated Traffic Control Evaluated through Microsimulation

Aleksandar Stevanovic [email protected] and Peter T. MartinView all authors and affiliations
Volume 2080, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.3141/2080-06

Abstract

Traffic signal timings can be optimized with offline or online tools. Offline tools, such as Synchro, take a macroscopic approach, whereas genetic algorithm (GA) formulations rely on a close interaction with traffic microsimulators. Online tools, such as the Split-Cycle Offset Optimization Technique (SCOOT), optimize in real time. Offline optimization tools have the luxury of time for repetitive computation, whereas SCOOT must work quickly as it responds to traffic detected on the streets. A comparison of the best offline tools and adaptive signal control is presented. The signal timing plans are first derived from the Synchro macroscopic optimization tool. A genetic algorithm (GA)-based formulation, which is essentially stochastic, resides in the VISSIM traffic simulation software; the GA component is known as VISGAOST. The latest version of SCOOT (MC3) is modeled with upstream and stop line detectors to enable both phase skipping and overlaps. The test bed is closely modeled on a 14-intersection network in Park City, Utah. The quality of signal timings is evaluated for two traffic demand types: expected (no significant variation) and unexpected (random variations). Results indicate that the offline GA formulation provides the optimal signal timing plans, robust enough to accommodate even randomly changing traffic demand. Similar in performance to Synchro, SCOOT delivers a creditable quality of optimization for an online optimization tool.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Hunt P. B. Robertson D. I. Bretherton R. D. and Winton R. I. SCOOT: Traffic Responsive Method of Coordinating Signals. Laboratory Report 1014. Transport and Road Research Lab, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1981.
Google Scholar
2. Lowrie P. R. The Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System: Principles, Methodology, Algorithms. In Proc., International Conference on Road Traffic Signaling, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1982, pp. 67–70.
Google Scholar
3. Gartner N. H. OPAC: A Demand-Responsive Strategy for Traffic Signal Control. In Transportation Research Record 906, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 75–81.
Google Scholar
4. Luk J. Y. K. Sims A. G. and Lowrie P. R. SCATS: Application and Field Comparison With a TRANSYT Optimised Fixed Time System. In Proc., International Conference on Road Traffic Signaling, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1982, pp. 71–74.
Google Scholar
5. Powell R. J. SCOOT in Southampton. In Proc., PTRC Annual Summer Meeting, Seminar M, P269, Brighton, United Kingdom, 1985, pp. 97–110.
Google Scholar
6. Jayakrishnan R. Mattingly S. P. and McNally M. G. Performance Study of SCOOT Traffic Control System with Non-Ideal Detectorization: Field Operational Test in the City of Anaheim. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2001.
Google Scholar
7. Mazzamatti M. V. Netto D. V. V. F. Villanova L. M. and Ming S. H. Benefits Gained by Responsive and Adaptive Systems in São Paulo. In Proc., IEE Road Transport and Information Control Conference, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, April 21–23, 1998.
Crossref
Google Scholar
8. Tarnoff P. J. and Ordonez J. Signal Timing Practices and Procedures: State of the Practice. FHWA-HOP-05-015. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2004.
Google Scholar
9. Park B. B. and Yun I. Stochastic Optimization Method for Coordinated Actuated Signal Systems. Research Report UVACTS-15-0-102, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, January 2006.
Google Scholar
10. Stevanovic A. Martin P. T. and Stevanovic J. VISGAOST: VISSIM-Based Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Signal Timings. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2035, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 59–68.
Crossref
Google Scholar
11. Taale H. Fransen W. C. M. and Dibbits J. The Second Assessment of the SCOOT System in Nijmegen. In Proc., IEE Road Transport and Information Control Conference, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, April 21–23, 1998.
Crossref
Google Scholar
12. Quan B. Y. Greenough J. C. and Kelman W. L. The Metropolitan Toronto SCOOT Demonstration Project. Presented at 72nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1993.
Google Scholar
13. Peck C. Gorton P. T. W. and Liren D. The Application of SCOOT in Developing Countries. In Proc., 3rd International IEE Conference on Road Traffic Control, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1990, pp. 104–109.
Google Scholar
14. Martin P. T. and Hansen B. G. Online Testing of SCOOT Using CORSIM: Development of a CORSIM Run-Time Extension. Report No. UTL-1198-017. University of Utah Traffic Laboratory, Salt Lake City, 1999.
Google Scholar
15. Jhaveri C. H. Perrin J. and Martin P. T. SCOOT Adaptive Signal Control: Evaluation of Its Effectiveness Over a Range of Congestion Intensities. In TRB 82nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
Google Scholar
16. Chilukuri B. R. Perrin J. Jr. and Martin P. T. SCOOT and Incidents: Performance Evaluation in Simulated Environment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 224–232.
Crossref
Google Scholar
17. Bretherton R. D. and Bowen G. T. Recent Enhancements to SCOOT: SCOOT Version 2.4. In Proc., 3rd IEE International Conference on Road Traffic Control, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1990, pp. 95–98.
Google Scholar
18. Bretherton D. Current Developments in SCOOT: Version 3. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1554, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 48–52.
Crossref
Google Scholar
19. Bretherton D. Wood K. and Bowen G. T. SCOOT Version 4. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 39, No. 7 1998, pp. 425–427.
Google Scholar
20. SCOOT User Guide: Version 4.2. Siemens Traffic Controls Ltd., Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom, 2003.
Google Scholar
21. Park B. B. Rouphail N. M. Hochanadel J. P. and Sacks J. Evaluating Reliability of TRANSYT-7F Optimization Schemes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 4 2001, pp. 319–326.
Crossref
Google Scholar
22. Rouphail N. M. Park B. B. and Sacks J. Direct Signal Timing Optimization: Strategy Development and Results. Technical Report No 109, National Institute of Statistical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, N.C., 2000. www.niss.org/technicalreports/tr109.pdf. Accessed Apr. 5, 2004.
Google Scholar
23. Foy M. D. Benekohal R. F. and Goldberg D. E. Signal Timing Determination Using Genetic Algorithms. In Transportation Research Record 1365, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 108–115.
Google Scholar
24. Goldberg D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.
Google Scholar
25. Hale D. Traffic Network Study Tool: TRANSYT-7F. U.S. Version T7F10. McTrans Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2005.
Google Scholar
26. Husch D. and Albeck J. Synchro 6, Traffic Signal Software: User Guide. Trafficware Corporation, Albany, Calif., 2003.
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 2080, Issue 1
Pages: 48 - 56
Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Aleksandar Stevanovic
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 122 South Central Campus Drive, Room 104, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0561.
[email protected]
View all articles by this author
Peter T. Martin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 122 South Central Campus Drive, Room 104, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0561.
View all articles by this author

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 122

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 14

  1. Traffic Signal Systems Solutions Toolbox: A Case Study from Pennsylvan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Data-Driven Decision Support Platform for Selection of Intersections f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Influence of adaptive signal control technology (ASCT) on severity of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Taking a deep breath: a qualitative study exploring acceptability and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Deep Q-network-based traffic signal control models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control: Comparison with Com...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Smart Signal – Adaptive Traffic Signal Control using Reinforcement Lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Combining taxi and social media data to explore urban mobility issues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Impact Analysis of Start-Up Lost Time at Major Intersections on Sathor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Bus signal priority based on SCOOT
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Traffic Optimization Design and Simulation Evaluation of Isolated Inte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A New Hardware-in-the-Loop Traffic Signal Simulation Framework to Brid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Development of a VISSIM Simulation Model for U-Turns at Unsignalized I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Distributed traffic signal control for maximum network throughput
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage