Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Measurement of Uncertainty Costs with Dynamic Traffic Simulations

Abstract

Nonrecurrent congestion in transportation networks occurs as a consequence of stochastic factors affecting demand and supply. Intelligent transportation systems such as advanced traveler information systems and advanced traffic management systems are designed to reduce the impacts of nonrecurrent congestion by providing information to a fraction of users or by controlling the variability of traffic flows. For these reasons, the design of these systems requires a reliable forecast of nonrecurrent congestion. A new method is proposed to measure the impacts of nonrecurrent congestion on travel costs by taking risk aversion into account. The traffic model is based on the dynamic traffic simulation model METROPOLIS. Incidents are generated randomly by reducing the capacity of the network. Users can instantaneously adapt to the unexpected travel conditions or can also change their behavior through a day-to-day adjustment process. Comparisons with incident-free simulations provide a benchmark for potential travel time savings that can be brought about by a state-of-the-art information system. The impact of variable travel conditions is measured by describing the willingness to pay to avoid risky or unreliable journeys. Indeed, for risk-averse drivers, any uncertainty corresponds to a utility loss. This utility loss is computed for several levels of network disruption. The main result of the study is that the utility loss due to uncertainty is of the same order of magnitude as the total travel costs.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lindley J. A. Urban Freeway Congestion Problems and Solutions: An Update. ITE Journal, Vol. 59, No. 12 1989, pp. 21–23.
2. Lindley J. A. Urban Freeway Congestion: Quantification of the Problem and Effectiveness of Potential Solutions. ITE Journal, Vol. 57, No. 1 1987, pp. 27–32.
3. Hallenbeck M. E. Ishimaru J. M. and Nee J. Measurement of Recurring Versus Non-Recurring Congestion. Technical Report WA–RD 568.1/568.2. Washington State Transportation Center, 2003.
4. Skabardonis A. Varaiya P. and Petty K. F. Measuring Recurrent and Nonrecurrent Traffic Congestion. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1856, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 118–124.
5. Emmerink R. H. W. Axhausen K. W. Pijkamp P. and Rietveld P. The Potential of Information Provision in a Simulated Road Transport Network with Nonrecurrent Congestion. Transportation Research, Vol. 3C, No. 5, 1995, pp. 293–309.
6. Peirce S. and Lappin J. Acquisition of Traveler Information and Its Effects on Travel Choices: Evidence from a Seattle-Area Travel Diary Survey. Research Paper 13813. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, 2003.
7. Muizelaar T. J. and van Arem B. Drivers’ Preferences for Traffic Information for Nonrecurrent Traffic Situations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2018, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 72–79.
8. Liu H. X. Ban X. Ran B. and Mirchandani P. Analytical Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model with Probabilistic Travel Times and Perceptions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1783, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 125–133.
9. Noland R. B. and Small K. A. Travel-Time Uncertainty, Departure Time Choice, and the Cost of Morning Commutes. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 150–158.
10. Brownstone D. and Small K. A. Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Transportation Research, Vol. 39A, 2005, pp. 279–293.
11. de Palma A. and Picard N. Equilibria and Information Provision in Risky Networks with Risk Averse Drivers. Transportation Science, Vol. 40, No. 4 2006, pp. 393–408.
12. Machina M. Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, 1982, pp. 281–296.
13. Gollier C. The Economics of Risk and Time. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2004.
14. von Neumann J. and Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1980.
15. de Palma A. and Marchal F. Dynamic Traffic Analysis with Static Data: Some Guidelines with Application to Paris. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 76–83.
16. de Palma A. and Marchal F. Real Case Applications of the Fully Dynamic METROPOLIS Tool-Box: An Advocacy for Large-Scale Mesoscopic Transportation Systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 2, No. 4 2002, pp. 347–369.
17. Arentze T. and Timmermans H. Representing Mental Maps and Cognitive Learning in Micro-Simulation Models of Activity-Travel Choice Dynamics. Transportation, Vol. 32, 2005, pp. 321–340.
18. Mithilesh J. Madanat S. and Peeta S. Perception Updating and Day-to-Day Travel Choice Dynamics in Traffic Networks with Information Provision. Transportation Research, Vol. 6C, 1998, pp. 129–212.
19. Chancelier J.-P. De Lara M. and de Palma A. Risk Aversion, Road Choice, and the One-Armed Bandit Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 41, No. 1 2007, pp. 1–14.
20. Hazelton M. Total Travel Cost in Stochastic Assignment Models. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 457–466.
21. DYNAMIT. www.mit.edu/its/dynamit.html. Accessed 2007.
23. Marchal F. Contribution to Dynamic Transportation Models. PhD thesis. University of Cergy-Pontoise, France, 2001. Available from http://marchal.let.fr.
24. de Palma A. and Picard N. Route Choice Decision Under Uncertainty. Transportation Research, Vol. 39A, 2005, pp. 295–324.
25. Hall R. W. Nonrecurrent Congestion: How Big Is the Problem? Are Traveler Information Systems the Solution? Transportation Research, Vol. 1C, No. 1, 1993, pp. 89–103.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fabrice Marchal
Laboratory of Transportation Economics-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Ave. Berthelot 14, F-69363 Lyon, France.
André de Palma
Université de Cergy-Pontoise, 33 Boulevard du Port, F-95011 Cergy-Pontoise, France.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 5

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Investigating Driver Preferences for Traffic Information Using Digital...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Modeling Uncertain Travel Times in Distribution Logistics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The valuation of travel time reliability: does congestion matter?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A Model of Risk-Sensitive Route-Choice Behavior and the Potential Bene...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Development of a Latent Variable Model to Capture the Impact of Risk A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub