Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2008

Evaluating Traveler Information Effects on Commercial and Noncommercial Users

Abstract

Incidents often account for nearly half of traffic congestion in urban areas and add uncertainty to transportation networks. The costs of incident-induced congestion, often in the form of delays, are borne by motorists and commercial carriers or associated businesses. In fact, a higher burden is borne by commercial carriers, given their higher costs and value of time. Dynamic traveler information about incidents disseminated through electronic media can benefit users. The extent of benefits associated with dynamic traveler information and whether network delays increase or decline were explored when (a) travelers can observe incidents, (b) commercial truck percentages increase in traffic, (c) truck drivers divert to alternate routes in the same way motorists do, as opposed to having lower diversion rates, and (d) commercial trucks have a higher value of time compared with passenger vehicles. With a behavioral route diversion model, the movement of commercial trucks and passenger vehicles in a simple transportation network was simulated. The results show how dynamic traveler information may or may not benefit commercial and noncommercial users under different scenarios.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Critical Issues in Transportation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
2. Traffic Incident Management Handbook. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
3. Khattak A. J. Fan Y. and Teague C. Economic Impact of Traffic Incidents on Businesses. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2067, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 93–100.
4. Levinson D. The Value of Advanced Traveler Information Systems for Route Choice. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 11, No. 1 2003, pp. 75–87.
5. Ben-Akiva M. de Palma A. and Kaysi I. Dynamic Network Models and Driver Information Systems. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, 1991, pp. 251–266.
6. Khattak A. J. Schofer J. L. and Koppelman F. S. Commuters’ Enroute Diversion and Return Decisions: Analysis and Implications for Advanced Traveler Information Systems. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 27, No. 2 1993, pp. 101–111.
7. Adler J. L. and Blue V. J. Toward the Design of Intelligent Traveler Information Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 6, No. 3 1998, pp. 157–172.
8. IDAS: Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Analysis System. Prepared for FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 1997.
9. DynaMIT: Real Time Traffic Estimation and Prediction System. Intelligent Transportation Systems Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. mit.edu/its/dynamit.html. Accessed Sept. 2007.
10. Mahmassani H. S. Sbayti H. and Zhou X. DYNASMART-P Version 1.0 User's Guide. Maryland Transportation Initiative, University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.
11. Golob T. F. and Regan A. C. The Perceived Usefulness of Different Source of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 38, No. 2 2002, pp. 97–116.
12. Golob T. F. and Regan A. C. Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Multivariate Discrete Choice Model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 3 2002, pp. 205–228.
13. Golob T. F. and Regan A. C. Trucking Industry Preferences for Traveler Information for Drivers Using Wireless Internet-Enabled Devices. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 13, No. 3 2005, pp. 235–250.
14. Al-Deek H. M. and Kanafani A. Modeling the Benefits of Advanced Traveler Information Systems in Corridors with Incidents. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 1, No. 4 1993, pp. 303–324.
15. Al-Deek H. M. Khattak A. J. and Thananjeyan P. A Combined Traveler Behavior and System Performance Model with Advanced Traveler Information Systems. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 32, No. 7 1998, pp. 479–493.
16. Chatterjee K. Hounsell N. and Firmin P. Driver Response to Variable Message Sign Information in London. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 2 2002, pp. 149–169.
17. Levinson D. M. and Huo H. Effectiveness of VMS Using Empirical Loop Detector Data. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
18. Arnott R. de Palma A. and Lindsey R. Does Providing Information to Drivers Reduce Traffic Congestion? Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, 1991, pp. 309–318.
19. Khattak A. J. Schofer J. L. and Koppelman F. S. Factors Influencing Commuters’ En Route Diversion Behavior in Response to Delay. In Transportation Research Record 1318, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 125–136.
20. Targa F. Khattak A. J. and Yim Y. B. Understanding Access and Acquisition of Dynamic Travel Information. Conference Proceedings, IGERT 2003 Annual Conference, University of California, Davis, 2003.
21. Peeta S. Zhang P. and Zhou W. Behavior-Based Analysis of Freeway Car-Truck Interactions and Related Mitigation Strategies. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 5 2005, pp. 417–451.
22. Rong-Chang J. Lam S.-H. Liu Y.-H. and Chen K.-H. Route Switching Behavior on Freeways with the Provision of Different Types of Real Time Traffic Information. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 445–461.
23. Gardes Y. Application of the INTEGRATION Model to Demonstrate the Simulation of Advanced Traveler Information Systems. Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.
24. PARAMICS Modeller V3.0 User Guide. Quadstone Limited, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2000.
25. Konduri S. Labi S. and Sinha K. C. Incident Occurrence Models for Freeway Incident Management. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1856, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 125–134.
26. Khattak A. J. Schofer J. L. and Wang M.-H. A Simple Time Sequential Procedure for Predicting Freeway Incident Duration. IVHS Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2 1995, pp. 113–138.
27. Weisbrod G. Vary D. and Treyz G. NCHRP Report 463: Economic Implication of Congestion. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
28. Hague Consulting Group. Economic Cost of Barriers to Road Transport. International Road Transport Union, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1998.
29. Khattak A. J. Driver Response to Unexpected Travel Conditions: Effect of Information and Other Factors. PhD dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., 1991.
30. Highway Capacity Manual 2000. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
31. Small K. A. Chu X. and Noland R. NCHRP Report 431: Valuation of Travel-Time Savings and Predictability in Congested Conditions for Highway User-Cost Estimation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.
32. Wang Y. and Nihan N., Dynamic Estimation of Freeway Large-Truck Volumes Based on Single-Loop Measurements, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 8, No. 3 2004, pp. 133–141.
33. Ng S. Cheu R. L. and Lee D.-H. Simulation Evaluation of the Benefits of Real-Time Traffic Information to Trucks during Incidents, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2 2006, pp. 89–99.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2008
Issue published: January 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaohong Pan
California Center for Innovative Transportation, University of California, Berkeley, 2105 Bancroft Way, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94720-3830.
Asad J. Khattak
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, 135 Kaufman Hall, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Exploring association between perceived importance of travel/traffic i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Impacts of Freeway Traffic Congestion on En-Route Traveler's Diversion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Development of a Latent Variable Model to Capture the Impact of Risk A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub