Free Trade Agreement Effects in the Mediterranean Region: An Analytic Approach Based on SURE Gravity Model
Abstract
Free trade agreements (FTAs) are tools that have been widely implemented for enhancing trade between countries. As a result, various models have been developed in an effort to explain the effects of these agreements on trade. The objective of this study is to develop a model suitable for exploring FTA effects on trade flows in the Mediterranean region. For that purpose a model is developed for analyzing trade flows based on the family of gravity models; the model parameters are estimated by using the seemingly unrelated regression estimation approach, in an effort to account for cross-sectional heterogeneity, serial correlation, and heteroscedasticity in the data set used. Results of the derived models are discussed and indicate that FTA effects on trade flows do exist but remain relatively low compared with other factors such as transportation costs.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Siousiouras P. The Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Zone: Prospects and Possibilities. Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 3 2003, pp. 112–121.
2. Venditto B. The Euromediterranean Free Trade Area: A New Form of Regional Cooperation. Proc., Encounters of the Mediterranean Economists, Split, Croatia, 1998.
3. McQueen M. The EU's Free-Trade Agreements with Developing Countries: A Case of Wishful Thinking? World Economy, Vol. 25, No. 9 2002, pp. 1369–1385.
4. Global Economic Prospects 2005. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 57–76.
5. Transek AB, CERUM, INRO, TOI, NEA. Ideas for a New Swedish Freight Model. Report, Norway, 2001.
6. Kouparitsas M. A. Should Trade Barriers Be Phased-Out Slowly? A Case Study of North America. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 23, 2001, pp. 875–900.
7. Augier P. and Gasiorek M. The Welfare Implications of Trade Liberalization Between the Southern Mediterranean and the EU. Applied Economics, Vol. 35, 2003, pp. 1171–1190.
8. Augier P. Gasiorek M. and Lai Tong C. Rules of Origin—The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows. Economic Policy, 2005, pp. 567–624.
9. Chisik R. Gradualism in Free Trade Agreements: A Theoretical Justification. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 59, 2003, pp. 367–397.
10. Baier S. L. and Bergstrand J. H. Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 64, 2004, pp. 29–63.
11. Bond E. W. Riezman R. G. and Syropoulos C. A Strategic and Welfare Theoretic Analysis of Free Trade Areas. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 64, 2004, pp. 1–27.
12. Raff H. Preferential Trade Agreements and Tax Competition for Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 88, 2004, pp. 2745–2763.
13. Ornelas E. Endogenous Free Trade Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 67, 2005, pp. 471–497.
14. Siriwardana M. The Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement: An Economic Evaluation. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, Vol. 18, 2007, pp. 117–133.
15. Garcia-Alvarez-Coque J.-M. Martinez-Gomez V. and Villanueva M. Modelling Euro-Mediterranean Agricultural Trade. Trade AG working paper. 2006.
16. Hertel T. Hummels D. Ivanic M. and Keeney R. How Confident Can We Be of CGE-Based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements? Economic Modelling, Vol. 24, 2007, pp. 611–635.
17. Timbergen J. Shaping the World Economy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1962.
18. Linneman H. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, No. 3 1966, pp. 474–481.
19. Bergstrand J. H. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, 1985, pp. 474–481.
20. Porojan A. Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited. Open Economies Review, Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 265–280.
21. Nowak-Lehmann F. Herzer D. Martinez-Zarzoso I. and Vollmer S. The Impact of a Customs Union between Turkey and the EU on Turkey's Exports to the EU. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3 2007, pp. 719–743.
22. Regione Campania, NTUA, Regione Calabria, CERTH, ADEP. Decision Support System Implementation. Deliverable D4m Project FREEMED—Interreg III B Archimed, EU, 2007.
23. Fukao K. Okubo T. and Stern R. M. An Econometric Analysis of Trade Diversion Under NAFTA. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 2–24.
24. Musila J. W. The Intensity of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in COMESA, ECCAS, and ECOWAS: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of African Economies, Vol. 14, No. 1 2005, pp. 117–141.
25. Peridy N. The Trade Effects of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: What Are the Lessons for ASEAN Countries? Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 16, 2005, pp. 125–139.
26. Sohn C.-H. Does the Gravity Model Explain South Korea's Trade Flows? Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 4 2005, pp. 417–430.
27. Martinez-Zarzoso I. and Suarez-Burguet C. The Determinants of Trade Performance: Influence of R&D on Export Flows. Applied Economics, Vol. 32, 2000, pp. 1939–1946.
28. Nitsch V. National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, No. 4 2000, pp. 1091–1105.
29. Wilson J. S. Mann C. L. and Otsuki T. Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: A New Approach to Quantifying the Impact. World Bank Economy Review, Vol. 17, No. 3 2003, pp. 367–389.
30. Pelletiere D. and Reinert K. A. Used Automobile Protection and Trade: Gravity and Ordered Probit Analysis. Empirical Economics, Vol. 29, 2004, pp. 737–751.
31. Lee H. and Park I. In Search of Optimised Regional Trade Agreements and Applications to East Asia. World Economy, Vol. 30, No. 5 2007, pp. 783–806.
32. Deardoff A. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In The Regionalization of the World Economy Frankel J. A. ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1998.
33. Feenstra R. C. Markusenand J. R. and Rose A. K. Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2 2001, pp. 430–447.
34. Iwanow T. and Kirkpatrick C. Trade Facilitation, Regulatory, Quality, and Export Performance. Journal of International Development, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 735–753.
35. Rose A. K. Currency Unions—One Money, One Market: The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade. Economic Policy, Vol. 7, No. 45, 2000.
36. Argyriou M. G. EU Participation and the External Trade of Greece: An Appraisal of the Evidence. Applied Economics, Vol. 32, 2000, pp. 151–159.
37. Egger P. An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials. World Economy, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 297–312.
38. Thorpe M. and Zhang Z. Study of the Measurement and Determinants of Intra-industry Trade in East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2 2005, pp. 231–247.
39. Kandogan Y. Evidence for the Natural Trade Partners Theory from the Euro-Mediterranean Region. Working Paper Series 2005-01. University of Michigan–Flint School of Management, 2005.
40. Carrere C. Revisiting the Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade Flows with Proper Specification of the Gravity Model. European Economic Review, Vol. 50, 2006, pp. 223–247.
41. Kucera D. and Sarna R. Trade Union Rights, Democracy, and Exports: A Gravity Model Approach. Review of International Economics, Vol. 14, No. 5 2006, pp. 859–882.
42. Longo R. and Sekkat K. Economic Obstacles to Expanding Intra-African Trade. World Development, Vol. 32, No. 8 2004, pp. 1309–1321.
43. Filippini C. and Molini V. The Determinants of East Asian Trade Flows: A Gravity Equation Approach. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 695–711.
44. Archibugi D. and Cogo A. A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries. Mimeo. Italian National Research Council, Italy, 2002.
45. Polak J. J. Is APEC a Natural Regional Trading Bloc? World Economy, Vol. 19, 1996, pp. 533–543.
46. Glick R. and Rose A. K. Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time-Series Evidence. European Economic Review, Vol. 46, 2002, pp. 1125–1151.
47. Antonucci D. and Manzocchi S. Does Turkey Have a Special Trade Relation with the EU? A Gravity Model Approach. Economic Systems, Vol. 30, 2006, pp. 157–169.
48. Peridy N. Toward a Pan-Arab Free Trade Area: Assessing Trade Potential Effects of the Agadir Agreement. The Developing Economies, Vol. XLIII, No. 3, 2005, pp. 329–345.
49. Endoh M. Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA, and the CMEA: 1960–1994. Applied Economics, Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 207–216.
50. Roberts B. A. A Gravity Study of the Proposed China–ASEAN Free Trade Area. International Trade Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4 2004, pp. 335–353.
51. Rojid S. COMESA Trade Potential: A Gravity Approach. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 13, 2006, pp. 947–951.
52. Tang D. Effects of the Regional Trading Arrangements on Trade: Evidence from the NAFTA, ANZCER, and ASEAN Countries, 1989–2000. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Vol. 14, No. 2 2005, pp. 241–265.
53. Kalirajan K. Stochastic Varying Coefficients Gravity Model: An Application in Trade Analysis. Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 2 1999, pp. 185–193.
54. Breston P. Tourdyeva N. and Whalley J. The Potential Trade Effects of an FTA between the EU and Russia. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 133, No. 2, 1997.
55. Francois J. F. McQueen M. and Wignaraja G. European Union—Developing Country and Analysis. World Development, Vol. 33, No. 10 2005, pp. 1545–1565.
56. Brown D. K. Kiyota K. and Stern R. M. Computational Analysis of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). North American Journal of Economics & Finance, Vol. 16, 2005, pp. 153–185.
57. Head K. Gravity for Beginners (mimeo). University of British Columbia, Canada, 2003.
58. Regione Campania, NTUA, Regione Calabria, CERTH, ADEP. Transportation Supply Model. Deliverable D2. Project FREEMED—Interreg III B Archimed, EU, 2007.
59. Washington S. Karlaftis M. G. and Mannering F. L. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.
60. Zellner A. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 57, 1962, pp. 348–368.
61. Wan G. H. Griffiths W. E. and Anderson J. R. Using Panel Data to Estimate Risk Effects in Seemingly Unrelated Production Functions. Empirical Economics, Vol. 17, 1992, pp. 35–49.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 89
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 10
- Exchange Rate Uncertainty and India’s Bilateral Trade: A Gravity Model...
- Assessment of freight traffic flows and harmful emissions in euro-medi...
- Ro-Ro/Ro-Pax maritime transport in Italy: A policy-oriented market ana...
- A gravity model analysis for trade between the GCC and developed count...
- A Gravity Model of Trade for Nicaraguan Agricultural Exports
- Monetary Policy and the Time-Varying Spatial Effects of Bilateral Trad...
- AN AGGREGATE TRANSPORT DEMAND MODEL FOR IMPORT AND EXPORT FLOW SIMULAT...
- A Multimodal Elastic Trade Coefficients MRIO Model for Freight Demand ...
- Assessment of Exposure Proxies for Macroscopic Road Safety Prediction
- Empirical Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Trade Gravity Mod...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
