Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Development of Decision Model for Selection of Appropriate Timely Delivery Techniques for Highway Projects

Abstract

On-time project performance is an important goal at the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT); pressure from two key constituents—the state legislature and trucking interests—creates an even stronger focus on this goal. Currently, statistics indicate that less than 50% of ODOT projects are completed within their originally contracted time of performance. Further, project delay causes uncertainty about exactly when traffic delays may occur on a given stretch of highway and makes it difficult to alert the public of these delays far in advance. The primary umbrella method used to ensure on-time performance in standard ODOT contracting is liquidated damages. Often this amount is difficult to determine, so the assessment value is usually a matter of some judgment. In practice, liquidated damages is not seen as an effective incentive and is thus rarely assessed. Other contracting and management methods that focus on encouraging on-time performance have been identified but are used sporadically. Implementation of a system that creates better awareness of alternative schedule delivery methods and that provides a consistent method for choosing among these methods would improve ODOT's schedule performance. Results are discussed of a research project (ODOT SPR-646) designed to enable development of a tool to assist in selection among various available alternative methods for ensuring timely project delivery, given a specific project profile, by using a selection model that is stable and scalable.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Hulett D. T. Project Schedule Risk Assessment. Project Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1 1995, pp. 21–31.
2. Laufer A. and Tucker R. L. Is Construction Project Planning Really Doing Its Job? A Critical Examination of Focus, Role and Process. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3 1987, pp. 243–266.
3. Kog Y. C. Chua D. K. H. Loh P. K. and Jaselskis E. J. Key Determinants for Construction Schedule Performance. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 117, No. 6 1999, pp. 351–359.
4. Transportation Research Circular E-C059: Accelerated Highway Construction—Workshop Series Summary. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2003.
5. Mulholland B. and Christian J. Risk Assessment in Construction Schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 1 1999, pp. 8–15.
6. Bogetoft P. and Pruzan P. Planning with Multiple Criteria. North-Holland, New York, 1991.
7. Triantaphyllou E. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study (Applied Optimization, Vol. 44). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2000.
8. Kuhn H. W. and Tucker A. W. Nonlinear Programming. In Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1951.
9. Fishburn P. C. Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Set: Applications to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research Society of America, Baltimore, Md., 1967.
10. Garber N. J. and Hoel L. A. Traffic and Highway Engineering, 3rd ed. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, Calif., 2002.
11. Miller D. W. and Starr M. K. Executive Decisions and Operations Research. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1969.
12. Mogharreban N. Adaptation of a Cluster Discovery Technique to a Decision Support System. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, Vol. 1, 2006, pp. 1–10.
13. Kepner C. H. and Tregoe B. B. The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. Kepner-Tregoe, Princeton, N.J., 1965.
14. Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
15. Kujawski E. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Limitations, Pitfalls and Practical Difficulties. Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif., 2003, pp. 1–8.
16. Saaty T. L. Fundamental Decision Making and Priority Thinking with the AHP. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1994.
17. Belton V. and Gear T. On a Shortcoming of Saaty's Method of Analytical Hierarchies. Omega, 1983, pp. 228–230.
18. Barzilai J. and Lootsma F. A. Power Relations and Group Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 6, 1997, pp. 155–165.
19. Vaidya O. S. and Kumar S. Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 169, 2006, pp. 1–29.
20. Benayoun R. Roy B. and Sussman N. Manual de Référence du Programme Electre. In Note de Synthèse et Formation, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, 1966.
21. Buchanan J. and Sheppard P. Ranking Projects Using the ELECTRE Method. Proc. 33rd Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of New Zealand, Hamilton, 2000.
22. Roy B. Present M. and Silhol D. A Programming Method for Determining Which Paris Metro Stations Should Be Renovated. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, 1986, pp. 318–334.
23. Olson D. L. Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 40, No. 7/8, 2005, pp. 721–727.
24. Deng H. Yeh C.-H. and Willis R. J. Inter-Company Comparison Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights. Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 27, 2000.
25. Anderson S. D. and Damnjanovic I. D. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 379: Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, p. 109.
26. Utah Local Technical Assistance Program. A+B Bidding. Innovative Contracting Home Page. http://www.ic.usu.edu. 2005. Accessed Aug. 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David N. Sillars
Oregon State University, 220 Owen Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 29

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Project Assessment Tools Evaluation and Selection Using the Hierarchic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A Decision Support Framework for Assessing the Contextual Factors for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Defining Complex Project Management of Large U.S. Transportation Proje...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub