Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Application of Uncertainty Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for Asphalt Pavement Construction Quality Control in China

Abstract

A comprehensive asphalt pavement construction quality control evaluation system and a computer program for this system were developed to improve asphalt pavement construction quality in China. The system was developed on the basis of the uncertainty analytic hierarchy process and used a large amount of data collected from actual asphalt paving construction projects and laboratory test results from various provinces and regions in China. The 33 indices incorporated into the system were selected by a panel of Chinese asphalt pavement experts. The indices included parameters related to materials, equipment, personnel, and the construction process that were deemed important in improving quality and performance of asphalt pavements. Weight factors for each of the 33 indices and the higher-level parameters in the three-level hierarchy system were generated by utilizing the uncertainty concept, which allowed the experts to assign relative importance between any related pairs of indices. The program was able to generate rating scores for asphalt pavement construction quality. Through evaluation of the rating scores among the parameters and indices generated by the system, potential problems in an asphalt pavement construction project could be detected in a timely manner and corrective actions applied to remediate the deficiencies detected by the system. The system, the first of this kind developed for assessing the quality control of asphalt pavement construction in China, has been used to monitor several major asphalt pavement construction projects in the country.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Gao M. and Liu X. Quality Control of Asphalt Mixture in the 2nd Period Engineering of Nanjing's Ring Road. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, Vol. 6, 1999, pp. 70–72.
2. Geng X. Influence and Countermeasure about Differentiation of the VV on Pavement Performance. Modern Transportation Technology, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 16–18.
3. Jiang L. Technological Control of SMA Production. Shanxi Architecture, Vol. 19, 2006, pp. 156–157.
4. Zhang F. Wei X. and Cao Y. Research on Asphalt Pavement Quality Control. East China Highway, Vol. 3, 1997, pp. 15–20.
5. Xu Y. Quality Control of Hot Asphalt Mixture. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 20–22.
6. Zhao L. Asphalt Pavement Construction Quality Control. Qinhai Transportation Technology, Vol. 4, 2003, pp. 50–51.
7. Le F. Procedure Control of Expressway Asphalt Pavement Constructing. Communications Standardization, Vol. 8, 2006, pp. 36–38.
8. Yu H. Analysis of Expressway Compactness Variability and Crevice Rate Variability. Construction Technology, Vol. 7, 2006, pp. 81–83, 95.
9. Jiang C. The Variability Analysis of Asphalt Pavement Construction Parameter of Expressway. Central South Highway Engineering, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 55–60.
10. Li L. Distribution Characteristics of Quality Variability During Construction of Asphalt Pavement. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 8, 2006, pp. 27–31.
11. Epps A. Spiegelman C. Park E. S. Arambula E. Ahmed T. and Apanasovich T. Initial Assessment of TxDOT Binder Quality Assurance Program. Analysis and Development of Asphalt Quality Assurance Procedures, Vol. 12, 2001, p. 130.
12. Kenis W. J. and Wang W. Analysis of Pavement Structural Variability. Report FHWA-RD-97-072. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997, p. 49.
13. Onraet J. M. The Influence of Crusher Sand on the Quality of Hot-Mix Asphalt. Quarry Management, Vol. 8, 1992.
14. Budwig J. L. Bituminous Pavement Smoothness: Statistically Based Approach to Acceptance. In Transportation Research Record 1544, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 125–134.
15. Ellis R. Bloomquist D. and Patel M. Development of Compaction Quality Control Guidelines That Account for Variability in Pavement Embankments in Florida. Final Report 4504-710-12. Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2003.
16. Peterson A. Making a Difference. World Highways, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2002.
17. Prowell B. D. and Dudley M. C. Evaluation of Measurement Techniques for Asphalt Pavement Density and Permeability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 36–45.
18. Rogge D. F. and Jackson M. A. Compaction and Measurement of Field Density for Oregon Open-Graded (F-Mix) Asphalt Pavement. Final Report SPR 386. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 1999.
19. Saaty T. L. and L. G. Vargas. Uncertainty and Rank Order in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 32, No. 1 1987, pp. 107–117.
20. Xing X. Flexible Base Asphalt Pavement Quality Control. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (Application Technology Edition). Vol. 5, 2006, pp. 69–72.
21. Liu Z. and Shan D. Asphalt Pavement Quality Control and Construction. Engineering and Construction, Vol. 3, 2006, pp. 231–233.
22. Wang C. Research on Application of Grizzle Theory and Engineering Quality Control. Nature Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, Vol. 3, 1995, pp. 129–132.
23. Thomas L. S. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2d ed. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1996.
24. Cheung F. K. Kuen J. L. and Skitmore M. Multicriteria Evaluation Model for the Selection of Architectural Consultants. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, No. 7 2002, pp. 569–580.
25. Xu X. and Yang Y. The Consistency Approximation and Weight Calculation Method of the Judgment Matrix in the Uncertain Type of AHP. System Engineering Theory and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 2 1998, pp. 19–22.
26. Beynon M. AHP Method: A Mathematical Analysis, Including an Understanding of Uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 140, No. 1 2002, pp. 148–164.
27. Hurley W. J. Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Note on an Approach to Sensitivity Which Preserves Rank Order. Computers and Operations Research, 2001, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 185–188.
28. Du H. and Li H. The Optimal Transitive Matrix Method in the Uncertain Type of AHP. Journal of Qufu Normal University, Vol. 23, No. 4 1997, pp. 37–40.
29. Technical Specifications for Construction of Highway Asphalt Pavements. JTG F40-2004. 2004.
30. Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement. JTG D50-2006. 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dajin Guo
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, 8 Xitucheng Road Haidian District, Beijing, China 100088.
Wenhuan Zhou
Chang'an University, Second Ring Road, Xi'an, Shannxi, China 710064.
Aimin Sha
Chang'an University, Second Ring Road, Xi'an, Shannxi, China 710064.
Ruyue Bai
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, 8 Xitucheng Road Haidian District, Beijing, China 100088.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 21

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Research on construction data association management of Urban Rail Tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. New Generation of Smart Highway: Framework and Insights
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. An improved risk assessment method based on a comprehensive weighting ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Safety Assessment of Emergency Training for Industrial Accident Scenar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Research on Network Level Pavement Maintenance Decision-Making Based o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Multiple-Fault Classification for Hot-Mix Asphalt Production by Machin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Methods to Evaluate the Aging Grades of Reclaimed Asphalt Binder
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Production Using Computer Simulation and Rea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub