Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Use of Stay-in-Place Forms for Concrete Bridge Decks in Tennessee

Abstract

Bridge decks, concrete or otherwise, represent one of the most heavily deteriorated components of typical highway bridges. Bridge construction continues to proceed at high volume, and in the past, bridge repair, rehabilitation, and replacement increased as well. Enormous amounts of funding are required to support initial construction and repairs as needed. This national trend is also evident within the Tennessee bridge inventory, which currently numbers approximately 20,000, with a majority of the structures utilizing concrete cast-in-place decks. Because of the increasing volume of work and limited funding, efficient methods of constructing and repairing concrete bridge decks have been of interest during the past decades. Durable, high-quality bridge decks have been constructed in Tennessee with three primary forming systems: temporary forms and falsework and stay-in-place form systems consisting of precast concrete panels and permanent steel forms. Each of these form systems is discussed, with a description of typical applications and estimation of the frequency of use. Currently, cast-in-place decks in Tennessee represent approximately 60% of the inventory and are predominantly (90%) cast by using permanent steel forms. The effects of stay-in-place forms on finished cast-in-place decks were investigated as well as form durability and inspection and repair considerations. This information was obtained through review of Tennessee Department of Transportation specifications and standard drawings and interviews of department personnel.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Tables of Frequently Requested NBI Data. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.htm. Accessed July 22, 2008.
2. Okeil A. M. and Kulkarni S. Flexural Resistance Models for Concrete Decks Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1976, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 190–196.
3. Ozyildirim C. Efforts to Improve Durability of Concrete in Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1979, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp 79–83.
4. Knight M. L. Wilson G. S. Seger W. J. and Mahadevan S. Overlay Types Used as Preventive Maintenance on Tennessee Bridge Decks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1866, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 79–84.
5. The 2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York. http://www.asce.org/reportcard/2005/index.cfm. Accessed July 25, 2008.
6. TDOT. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. http://www.tdot.state.tn.us/Chief_Engineer/engr_library/stddrlib.htm. Accessed June 28, 2008.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marcus L. Knight
Concrete Industry Management Program, Middle Tennessee State University, MTSU P.O. Box 19, Murfreesboro, TN 37132.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Contribution of perforated steel ribs to load-carrying capacities of s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub