Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Simulation-Based Network Maintenance Planning and Scheduling

Abstract

Lock deterioration in a waterway network requires timely maintenance to maintain navigability and regular lockage service. Locks degrading over time have reduced capacities and increased service times. Because demand responds to service changes, the objective function maximizes the overall net benefits rather than the minimization of costs. To maximize the net benefits, it is important to schedule maintenance that preserves lock conditions above threshold values, provides minimum acceptable service, and reduces the risks of serious failures. With constrained budgets, network-level maintenance can be scheduled over a planning horizon. A waterway model that combines simulation and optimization was developed to allocate maintenance funds and to schedule maintenance tasks optimally. Numerical cases are evaluated by parallel processing. The promising demonstration of simulation-based optimization shows the applicability of the proposed methodology to network-level and component-level maintenance planning and scheduling.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wang S. and Schonfeld P. Scheduling Interdependent Waterway Projects Through Simulation and Genetic Optimization. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 3, May/June, 2005, pp. 89–97.
2. Peshkin D. G. Hoerner T. E. and Zimmerman K. A. NCHRP Report 523: Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
3. Maji A. and Jha M. K. Modeling Highway Infrastructure Maintenance Schedule with Budget Constraints. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1991, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 19–26.
4. Chen C.-H. P. and Schonfeld P. M. Pavement Resurfacing Intervals in Work Zone Optimization. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
5. Hudson W. R. Haas R. and Uddin W. Infrastructure Management: Integrating Design, Construction, Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Renovation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.
6. Al-Subhi K. M. Johnston D. W. and Farid F. Resource-Constrained Capital Budgeting Model for Bridge Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Replacement. In Transportation Research Record 1268, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 110–117.
7. Chan W. T. Fwa T. Fwa F. and Tan C. Y. Road-Maintenance Planning Using Genetic Algorithms. I. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 5 1994, pp. 693–709.
8. Fwa T. F. Tan C. Y. and Chan W. T. Road-Maintenance Planning Using Genetic Algorithms. II. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 5 1994, pp. 710–722.
9. Durango-Cohen P. L. Maintenance and Repair Decision Making for Infrastructure Facilities Without a Deterioration Model. Journal of Infrastructure System, Vol. 10, No. 1 2004, pp. 1–8.
10. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River–Illinois Waterway. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10072.
11. McAllister T. P. and Ellingwood B. R. Reliability-Based Condition Assessment of Welded Miter Gate Structures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3 2001, pp. 95–106.
12. Males R. M. Navigation System Simulation (NaSS) Design Documents. IWR Report 06-NETS-R-06. Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2006.
13. Grier D. V. Measuring the Service Levels for Inland Waterways: Alternative Approaches for Budget Decision Making. TR News, No. 221, July 2002, pp. 10–17.
14. Curlee T. R. Busch I. K. Hilliard M. R. Oladosu G. Southworth F. and Vogt D. P. Economic Foundations of Ohio River Navigation Investment Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1871, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 13–23.
15. Langdon V. L. Jr. Hilliard M. R. and Busch I. K. Future Utilization and Optimal Investment Strategy for Inland Waterways: New Model from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Assist Policy Makers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1871, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 33–41.
16. Navigation Data Center Publications and U.S. Waterway Data. Institute for Water Resources Navigation Data Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2004.
17. Wang S. Tao X. and Schonfeld P. Modeling Shipper Response to Scheduled Waterway Lock Closures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1963, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 33–43.
18. Wang S.-L. and Schonfeld P. M. Demand Elasticity and Benefit Measurement in a Waterway Simulation Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2033, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 53–61.
19. Wang S.-L. and Schonfeld P. M. Development of Generalized Waterway Simulation Model for Waterway Operation. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shiaau-Lir Wang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Ning Yang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Paul Schonfeld
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 32

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Benefits of Alternative Criteria for Scheduling Dewatering Events at N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A Decision-Making Framework for Maintenance and Modernization of Trans...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. State of the art in simulation-based optimisation for maintenance syst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub