Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Elementary Units of Exposure

Abstract

Most road safety studies rely on summary measures of exposure. The term “summary measure” denotes any aggregate indicator of exposure that does not directly identify and count the number of opportunities for accidents to occur. This paper shows how elementary units of exposure can be developed on the basis of known aggregate measures, such as annual average daily traffic (AADT). An elementary unit of exposure refers to any event that generates an opportunity for an accident to occur. Four such events are identified: (a) encounters (i.e., vehicles passing each other in opposite directions of travel); (b) simultaneous arrivals at points of intersection between potentially conflicting directions of travel, in particular vehicles entering intersections at the same time or within a very short time interval; (c) change of travel lane on multilane highways; and (d) braking or stopping. These events describe traffic movements that occur before a wide range of crash types. The only major group of accidents that is not directly related to particular events is running off the road. The number of events expected to occur for each of the four types identified is estimated on the basis of the following assumptions: (a) AADT is known [when estimating the number of events, mean hourly volume (AADT/24) is used]; (b) vehicles or road users arrive at a point of potential conflict according to a Poisson process; and (c) simultaneous arrivals within a very short time interval (such as 1 s) have the potential to generate a conflict. The number of encounters and simultaneous arrivals in intersections increases considerably faster than AADT. The number of events that may generate conflicts involving lane changes, braking, or stopping increases more slowly than does AADT.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chapman R. The Concept of Exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 5, 1973, pp. 95–110.
2. Council F. M., Stewart J. R., and Rodgman E. A. Development of Exposure Measures for Highway Safety Analysis. Report FHWA/RD-87/092. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1987.
3. Hauer E., Ng J. C. N., and Lovell J. Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–61.
4. Hauer E. Exposure and Accident Rate. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 36, 1995, pp. 134–138.
5. Mensah A., and Hauer E. Two Problems of Averaging Arising in the Estimation of the Relationship Between Accidents and Traffic Flow. In Transportation Research Record 1635, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 37–43.
6. Jonsson T., Ivan J. N., and Zhang C. Crash Prediction Models for Intersections on Rural Multilane Highways: Differences by Collision Type. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 91–98.
7. Hauer E., Council F. M., and Mohammedshah Y. Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 96–105.
8. Lord D., Geedipally S., Persaud B. N., Washington S. P., van Schalkwyk I., Ivan J. N., Lyon C., and Jonsson T. NCHRP Web Document 126: Methodology to Predict the Safety Performance of Rural Multilane Highways. Contractor's final report for NCHRP project 17-29. Web-only document 126. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w126.pdf.
9. Hakamies-Blomqvist L., Raitanen T., and O'Neill D. Driver Ageing Does Not Cause Higher Accident Rates per km. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 5, 2002, pp. 271–274.
10. Fontaine H. Driver Age and Road Accidents. What Is the Risk for Seniors? Recherche Transports Sécurité, Vol. 79, 2003, pp. 107–120.
11. Langford J., Methorst R., and Hakamies-Blomqvist L. Older Drivers Do Not Have a High Crash Risk—A Replication of Low Mileage Bias. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 574–578.
12. Alvarez F. J., and Fierro I. Older Drivers, Medical Condition, Medical Impairment and Crash Risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 55–60.
13. Hauer E. Left Turn Protection, Safety, Delay and Guidelines: A Literature Review. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2004. www.roadsafetyresearch.com.
14. Martin J.-L., and Quincy R. Crossover Crashes at Median Strips Equipped with Barriers on a French Motorway Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1758, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 6–12.
15. Fridstrøm L. Econometric Models of Road Use, Accidents, and Road Investment Decisions, Vol. II. Report 457. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1999.
16. Elvik R. Laws of Accident Causation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 742–747.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rune Elvik
Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349, Oslo, Norway.
Alena Erke
Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349, Oslo, Norway.
Peter Christensen
Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349, Oslo, Norway.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 59

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 32

  1. Microscopic Traffic Risk Assessment at Signalized Intersections of a B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Effect of vehicle size on crash risk in a heterogeneous traffic scenar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Specifying Autonomous Driving Scenarios
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The ‘safety in density’ effect for cyclists and motor vehicles in Scan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Cyclists at Roundabouts: Risk Analysis and Rational Criteria for Choos...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Observations on the Relationship between Crash Frequency and Traffic F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Event-based road safety assessment: A novel approach towards risk micr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Traffic volume and crashes and how crash and road characteristics affe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Towards linking driving complexity to crash risk
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Nighttime safety evaluation for signalized intersections at the signal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Transferability of real-time safety performance functions for signaliz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Risk Analysis and Safer Layout Design Solutions for Bicycles in Four-L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Safety Problems in Urban Cycling Mobility: A Quantitative Risk Analysi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Using HLM to investigate the relationship between traffic accident ris...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Geometrical and Functional Criteria as a Methodological Approach to Im...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Safety Performance Evaluation of a Three-Leg Unsignalized Intersection...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Bayesian estimation of conflict-based safety performance functions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Modeling spatial relationships between multimodal transportation infra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Conflict-Based Safety Performance Functions for Predicting Traffic Col...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Applications of Generalized Additive and Bayesian Hierarchical Models ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Exposure-based Road Traffic Fatality Rates by Mode of Travel in France
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Some implications of an event-based definition of exposure to the risk...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Road crash fatality rates in France: A comparison of road user types, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Can it be true that most drivers are safer than the average driver?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Evaluation of Postencroachment Time as Surrogate for Opposing Left-Tur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Exposure to lateral collision in signalized intersections with protect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Are rural older drivers subject to low-mileage bias?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Extended prediction models for crashes at roundabouts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Are Age-Based Licensing Restrictions a Meaningful Way to Enhance Rural...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Exploratory Study of Mechanisms by Which Exposure Influences Accident ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub