Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Analyzing Different Parameterizations of the Varying Dispersion Parameter as a Function of Segment Length

Abstract

Until a few years ago, the dispersion parameter of Poisson–gamma models had been assumed to be invariant of the characteristics of the observations under study, but recent research in highway safety has shown that the dispersion parameter can depend on the covariates of the model. To account for this dependence, some researchers have reported that the dispersion parameter should be modeled solely as a function of segment length. The primary objective of this research was to examine empirically whether the dispersion parameter should be characterized using only the length of the segment. If not, the secondary objective consisted of determining alternative parameterizations using other covariates that would offer a better approach for characterizing the variance function of Poisson–gamma models. To accomplish the study objectives, 10 parameterizations describing the varying dispersion parameter were estimated with three different data sets collected in Texas, California, and Washington State. Flow-only models were used for comparing the parameterizations. The Akaike information criterion and other related goodness-of-fit (GOF) measures were used for evaluating and comparing the different models. The results of this study show that no single functional form or parameterization is suitable for all the data sets. Traffic flow was more significantly associated with the structured variation observed in the data than segment length. It is therefore recommended that transportation safety analysts evaluate different parameterizations and select the most appropriate one using a combination of GOF criteria, including the significance of the model's coefficients.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Poch M., and Mannering F. L. Negative Binomial Analysis of Intersection-Accident Frequencies. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 2, 1996, pp. 105–113.
2. Miaou S.-P., and Lord D. Modeling Traffic Crash-Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Functional Form, and Bayes Versus Empirical Bayes Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 31–40.
3. Geedipally S. R., and Lord D. Effects of the Varying Dispersion Parameter of Poisson–Gamma Models on the Estimation of Confidence Intervals of Crash Prediction Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2061, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 46–54.
4. Park B.-J., and Lord D. Adjustment for Maximum Likelihood Estimate of Negative Binomial Dispersion Parameter. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2061, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 9–19.
5. Lord D., Washington S. P., and Ivan J. N. Poisson, Poisson–Gamma and Zero Inflated Regression Models of Motor Vehicle Crashes: Balancing Statistical Fit and Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35–46.
6. Oh J., Washington S. P., and Nam D. Accident Prediction Model for Railway–Highway Interfaces. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 346–356.
7. Lord D., Guikema S. D., and Geedipally S. Application of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson Generalized Linear Model for Analyzing Motor Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1123–1134.
8. Hauer E. Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
9. Hauer E. Overdispersion in Modelling Accidents on Road Sections and in Empirical Bayes Estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2001, pp. 799–808.
10. Heydecker B. G., and Wu J. Identification of Sites for Road Accident Remedial Work by Bayesian Statistical Methods: An Example of Uncertain Inference. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 32, 2001, pp. 859–869.
11. Mitra S., and Washington S. P. On the Nature of Over-Dispersion in Motor Vehicle Crash Prediction Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2007, pp. 459–468.
12. Miranda-Moreno L. F., Fu L., Saccomanno F. F., and Labbe A. Alternative Risk Models for Ranking Locations for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–8.
13. Lord D., and Park P. Y.-J. Investigating the Effects of the Fixed and Varying Dispersion Parameters of Poisson-Gamma Models on Empirical Bayes Estimates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1441–1457.
14. El-Basyouny K., and Sayed T. A. Comparison of Two Negative Binomial Regression Techniques in Developing Accident Prediction Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1950, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 9–16.
15. Mountain L., and Fawaz B. Estimating Accidents at Junctions Using Routinely-Available Input Data. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 11, 1996, pp. 624–628.
16. Persaud B. N., Retting R. A., Gårder P. E., and Lord D. Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes Observational Before–After Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 1–8.
17. Lord D. Modeling Motor Vehicle Crashes Using Poisson-Gamma Models: Examining the Effects of Low Sample Mean Values and Small Sample Size on the Estimation of the Fixed Dispersion Parameter. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 751–766.
18. Xie Y., Lord D., and Zhang Y. Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions Using Bayesian Neural Networks: An Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2007, pp. 922–933.
19. Cameron A. C., and Trivedi P. K. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1998.
20. Maher M. J., and Summersgill I. A Comprehensive Methodology for the Fitting Predictive Accident Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1996, pp. 281–296.
21. Hardin J. J., and Hilbe J. M. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. Stata Press, College Station, Tex., 2001.
22. Hilbe J. M. Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007.
23. Persaud B., Lord D., and Palminaso J. Calibration and Transferability of Accident Prediction Models for Urban Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 57–64.
24. Lord D., and Bonneson J. A. Calibration of Predictive Models for Estimating Safety of Ramp Design Configurations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 88–95.
25. Version 9 of the SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., 2002.
26. Lord D., Geedipally S. R., Persaud B. N., Washington S. P., van Schalkwyk I., Ivan J. N., Lyon C., and Jonsson T. NCHRP Web-Only Document 126: Methodology for Estimating the Safety Performance of Multi-lane Rural Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp-w126.pdf. Accessed June 2008.
27. Burnham K. P., and Anderson D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Srinivas Reddy Geedipally
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Dominique Lord
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.
Byung-Jung Park
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 57

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 21

  1. Developing Safety Performance Functions for Commercial Motor Vehicle C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A comparative analysis of intersection hotspot identification: Fixed v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Developing the crash modification model for urban street lighting
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Application of different negative binomial parameterizations to develo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Cross-sectional and panel studies in safety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Applying a joint model of crash count and crash severity to identify r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Application of the Poisson-Tweedie distribution in analyzing crash fre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Contrasting case-wise deletion with multiple imputation and latent var...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Effects of geometry and pavement friction on horizontal curve crash fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. An international review of challenges and opportunities in development...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Chapter 14. Safety Prediction with Datasets Characterised with Excess ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Transferability Analysis of Heterogeneous Overdispersion Parameter Neg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Applying the Generalized Waring model for investigating sources of var...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Analyzing different functional forms of the varying weight parameter f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Comparison of Sichel and Negative Binomial Models in Estimating Empiri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. The Conway-Maxwell-Poisson model for analyzing crash data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Discretization of Road Networks for Safety Evaluation with Considerati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Examination of Crash Variances Estimated by Poisson–Gamma and Conway–M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Bias properties of Bayesian statistics in finite mixture of negative b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Revisiting Variability of Dispersion Parameter of Safety Performance f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub