Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Improving Usability of a Complex Household Travel Survey: An Evaluation of User Requirements

Abstract

Data quality refers not only to statistical characteristics of a respective data set but also includes further dimensions that are closely related to user requirements in regard to content, convenience of access, comprehensibility, and usability. Especially with respect to data sets designated for multiple secondary analyses by heterogeneous users, particular attention must be given to data processing, data documentation, and supplementary information. Within the context of a large-scale national household travel survey, a two-stage evaluation approach was developed to get a better understanding of a data set's usability for various parties. The evaluation process consisted of two parts: first, a retrospective online user survey was completed to get a general overview of the user community, the respective context of data usage, and the users’ overall satisfaction. Subsequently, a one-day user workshop was held. While the survey was designed mainly as an exploratory instrument for effectively revealing the majority of relevant issues, the workshop was intended to discuss complex or controversial matters with highly qualified and committed stakeholders. Both the survey and the workshop revealed the crucial role of a user-centered approach when a survey is conducted. In fact, quite a few survey adjustments can be accomplished with reasonable effort while ensuring comparability and keeping within a given budget. Mostly, these adjustments are related to data processing, documentation, and information. On the basis of the findings, general recommendations were made, with special emphasis on the essential consideration of different user requirements.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Brackstone G. J. Managing Data Quality in a Statistical Agency. Survey Methodology (Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 12-001-XPB), Vol. 25, No. 2, Dec. 1999, pp. 129–149.
2. Institut fuer angewandte Sozialwissenschaft (infas). Mobilitaet in Deutschland (MiD). www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/. Accessed March 4, 2009.
3. Institut fuer angewandte Sozialwissenschaft (infas) and Deutsches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW). Kontinuierliche Erhebung zum Verkehrsverhalten—Methodenstudie, Endbericht [Research Project 70.631/2000 within the research program Urban Transport of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing (BMVBW)], 2001. www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/03_kontiv2002/pdf/Methodenstudie_Endbericht.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2009.
4. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR). Clearing House for Transport Data. www.clearingstelle-verkehr.de. Accessed March 4, 2009.
5. European Commission. Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics (NUTS), Statistical Regions of Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/home_regions_en.html. Accessed March 4, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Angelika Schulz
German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transport Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Claudia Nobis
German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transport Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Robert Follmer
infas Institut fuer angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, Friedrich-Wilhelm-Str. 18, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Birgit Jesske
infas Institut fuer angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, Friedrich-Wilhelm-Str. 18, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Dana Gruschwitz
infas Institut fuer angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, Friedrich-Wilhelm-Str. 18, 53113 Bonn, Germany.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub