Efficiency and Effectiveness of Cell Phone Samples in Transportation Surveys
Abstract
Ensuring coverage of cell phone–only respondents in survey samples is becoming more important in transportation surveys. Various sampling approaches are available to accommodate this requirement. This paper compares and contrasts the efficiencies and outcomes associated with two of them: (a) the active contact method using a sample of cell phone numbers and (b) passive contact method using a sample of postal service addresses. The efficiency of the samples was evaluated on measures such as data collection efforts, response rates, and cost per interview. The characteristics of respondents reached via each of the sample types based on telephone ownership patterns were contrasted with demographic characteristics of cell-only respondents. Sizes of both samples were quite large and provided significant methodological insights. These insights have important implications for transportation surveys that use either sampling approach to ensure coverage of cell-only respondents.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Blumberg S., and Luke J. Wireless Substitution: Preliminary Data from the January–June 2006 National Health Interview Survey. www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/wireless2006/wireless2006.htm.
2. Blumberg S., and Luke J. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2006. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200705.pdf.
3. Blumberg S., and Luke J. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wire-less200805.pdf.
4. Link M. W., Battaglia M. P., Frankel M. R., Osborn L., and Mokdad A. H. A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) For General Population Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2008, pp. 6–27.
5. Kulp D. W., Brick J. M., and Fahimi M. Biases in RDD Sampling: a 21st-Century Digital World Reassessment. Presented at 63rd American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, New Orleans, La., 2008.
6. AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. Guidelines and Considerations for Survey Researchers When Planning and Conducting RDD and Other Telephone Surveys in the U.S. With Respondents Reached via Cell Phone Numbers. AAPOR, April 2008. www.aapor.org/uploads/Final_AAPOR_Cell_Phone_TF_report_041208.pdf.
7. Steeh C. A New Era for Telephone Surveys. Presented at Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, Ariz., 2004.
8. Brick J. M., Brick P. D., Dipko S., Presser S., Tucker C., and Yuan Y. Cell Phone Survey Feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and Calling Cell Numbers Versus Landline Numbers, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 71, 2007, pp. 23–39.
9. Iannacchione V. G., Staab J. M., and Redden D. T. Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a Metropolitan Household Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 76, 2003, pp. 202–210.
10. O'Muircheartaigh C., Eckman S., and Weiss C. Traditional and Enhanced Field Listing for Probability Sampling. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol. 25, 2000, pp. 63–67.
11. Staab J. M., and Iannacchione V. G. Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a National Household Survey. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol. 40, 2004, pp. 28–33.
12. Link M. W., Battaglia M., Giambo P., Frankel M., and Mokdad A. Assessment of Address Frame Replacements for RDD Sampling Frames. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Fla., 2005.
13. AAPOR Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th ed. AAPOR, Lenexa, Kan., 2008.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 19
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 4
- Integration of a phone-based household travel survey and a web-based s...
- The Challenges of Developing an Online Tool to Measure the Quality of ...
- Noncoverage Errors in Travel Surveys Due to Mobile Phone–Only Househol...
- Are Cell Phone Samples Needed for Studies of Walking Activity?
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
