Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Development and Demonstration of a Modeling Framework for Airport Terminal Planning and Performance Evaluation

Abstract

Airport stakeholders and policy makers involved in airport strategic planning, design, and operations have a vested interest in assessing how their decisions on alternative terminal layout concepts and operational policies affect overall airport terminal system performance. A considerable amount of research has been devoted to modeling airport terminal operations and performance evaluation. However, no aggregate model provides the capability of supporting strategic decision making while addressing the modeling requirements of a generic model that can capture the complexity of airport terminal processes and a flexible model that can be easily customized to reflect the configuration and operational characteristics of any airport terminal. The objective of this research was threefold: (a) to demonstrate the need for adopting a new approach for airport terminal modeling and performance analysis; (b) to present the overall methodological framework followed for the development of the proposed model, with discussion of the conceptual framework adopted, the airport terminal domain ontology developed, and the model architecture and design; and (c) to demonstrate the model capabilities through modeling and analyzing the Athens, Greece, International Airport terminal case under two alternative traffic demand scenarios.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Odoni A., Deyst J., Feron E., Hansman R., Khan K., Kuchar J., and Simpson R. Existing and Required Modeling Capabilities for Evaluating ATM Systems and Concepts. International Center for Air Transportation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1997. web.mit. edu/aeroastro/www/labs/AATT/aatt.html. Accessed March 7, 2009.
2. DeNeufville R., and Odoni A. Airport Systems: Planning, Design and Management. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.
3. Manataki I. E., and Zografos K. G. A Generic System Dynamics Based Tool for Airport Terminal Performance Analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2009 (in press).
4. Joustra P. E., and Van Dijk N. M. Simulation of Check-In at Airports. In Proc., 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 1023–1028.
5. Appelt S., Batta R., Lin L., and Drury C. Simulation of Passenger Check-In at a Medium-Sized US Airport. In Proc., 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2007, pp. 1252–1260.
6. Kiyildi R. K., and Karasahin M. The Capacity Analysis of the Check-In Unit of Antalya Airport Using the Fuzzy Logic Method. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 610–619.
7. Wilson D., Roe E. K., and So S. A. Security Checkpoint Optimizer (Sco): An Application for Simulating the Operations of Airport Security Checkpoints. In Proc., 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, Calif., 2006, pp. 529–535.
8. Pendergraft D. R., Robertson C. V., and Shrader S. Simulation of an Airport Passenger Security System. In Proc., 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 874–878.
9. Tosic V. A Review of Airport Passenger Terminal Operations Analysis and Modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1992, pp. 3–26.
10. Andreatta G., Brunetta L., Odoni A. R., Righi L., Stamatopoulos M. A., and Zografos K. G. A Set of Approximate and Compatible Models for Airport Strategic Planning on Airside and on Landside. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1999, pp. 291–317.
11. Zografos K. G., Madas M. A., van Eenige M. J. A., and Valdes R. A. Integrated Airport Performance Analysis Through the Use of the OPAL Platform. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2005, pp. 357–386.
12. Zografos K. G., and Madas M. A. Development and Demonstration of an Integrated Decision Support System for Airport Performance Analysis. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 1–17.
13. THENA. Position Paper on Airport Simulation and Modeling Issues. Thematic Network on Airport Activities (THENA) Research Project, EC DG-TREN. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
14. Mumayiz S. A. Overview of Airport Terminal Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record 1273, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 11–20.
15. Odoni A. R. Transportation Modeling Needs: Airports and Airspace. John A. Volpe National Transportation Center, Cambridge, Mass., 1991.
16. Odoni A. R., and de Neufville R. Passenger Terminal Design. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 26, 1992, pp. 27–35.
17. Transportation Research Circular E-C035: Airport–Airspace Simulations for Capacity Evaluation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec035/ec035.pdf Accessed April 24, 2009.
18. Airports and Air Transport—Planning and Design: Airport Terminal Modeling and Simulation. www.halcrow.com/html/our_markets/airports/airports_arcport.htm. Accessed March 7, 2009.
19. Snowdon J. L., MacNair E., Montevecchi M., Callery C. A., El-Taji S., and Miller S. IBM Journey Management Library: An Arena System for Simulations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 51, 2000, pp. 449–456.
20. Transportation Research Circular E-C042: Airport–Airspace Simulations: A New Outlook. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec042/ec042.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2009.
21. OPAL Consortium. Design of OPAL Model Base. Deliverable D2.2, Optimisation Platform for Airports including Landside (OPAL). Research Project funded by the European Commission (DG TREN), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
22. IATA. Total AirportSim: A Powerful, Cost-Effective Simulation Solution. Total AirportSim Brochure. www.iata.org/NR/ContentConnector/CS2000/SiteInterface/sites/soi/file/TAS_Brochure.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2009.
23. Preston Aviation Solutions, TAAM Solutions: Fast Time Gate-to-Gate Simulation, TAAM Brochure. www.preston.net/Documents/taambrochure.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2009.
24. Manataki I. E., and Zografos K. G. A Simulation Model for Airport Terminal Planning and Operational Performance Assessment. Proc., 3rd International Congress on Transportation Research in Greece, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2006, pp. 432–441.
25. Manataki I. E., and Zografos K. G. A System Dynamics Approach for Airport Terminal Performance Evaluation. Proc., 4th International Workshop on Modeling, Simulation, Verification and Validation of Enterprise Information Systems (MSVVEIS 2006), Paphos, Cyprus, 2006, pp. 206–209.
26. Beis D. A., Loucopoulos P., Pyrgiotis Y., Zografos K. G. PLATO Helps Athens Win Gold: Olympic Games Knowledge Modeling for Organizational Change and Resource Management. Interfaces, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2006, pp. 26–42.
27. Special Report 215: Measuring Airport Landside Capacity. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.
28. Forrester J. W. System Dynamics, Systems Thinking, and Soft OR. System Dynamics Review, Vol. 10, No. 2/3, 1994, pp. 245–256.
29. Richmond B. M. Systems Thinking: Critical Thinking Skills for the 1990s and Beyond. System Dynamics Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1993, pp. 113–133.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ioanna E. Manataki
Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Evelpidon 47A and Lefkados 33, Athens 113 62, Greece.
Konstantinos G. Zografos
Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Evelpidon 47A and Lefkados 33, Athens 113 62, Greece.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 73

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. A Framework for Sharing Staff between Outbound and Inbound Airport Pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Simulation method for dispatching national border security manpower to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A System Dynamics Approach to the Evaluation of Airport Technology Por...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Assessing airport terminal performance using a system dynamics model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub