Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Transportation Planning Education in the United States: Literature Review, Course Survey, and Findings

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a nationwide survey on transportation planning topics taught at U.S. universities. The survey gathered a comprehensive inventory of courses, documented variations in curricula, and determined the variations among those curricula in how they emphasized different transportation topics. This paper also includes a literature review to trace the evolution of transportation classes and education over time. Along with the survey on course content, the manuscript presents an analysis of the spatial distribution of transportation courses and in particular of transportation planning courses. The study finds that educational opportunities in transportation planning are widely distributed across the nation and that students are able to take advantage of the opportunities. However, some planning programs stand out for offering a wider variety of relevant topics, and those programs are concentrated on the coasts. Relatively little is known about the affect of geography on the allocation of resources in transportation education. Transportation educators have multiple opportunities for exploring new topics and methods, such as by including globalization and comparative study, promoting transportation planning knowledge across different educational levels, and continuing to monitor and evaluate higher education and training programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Special Report 275: The Workforce Challenge: Recruiting, Training, and Retaining Qualified Workers for Transportation and Transit Agencies. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. FHWA. National Transportation Workforce Summit: Summary of Proceedings. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 2002.
3. Special Report 207: Transportation Professionals: Future Needs and Opportunities. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
4. Special Report 210: Transportation Education and Training: Meeting the Challenges: Proceedings of the Conference on Surface Transportation Education and Training. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
5. Conference Proceedings 17: Intermodal Transportation Education and Training. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
6. Turnbull K. F. Transportation Planning Education in Urban and Regional Planning Graduate Programs. In Transportation Research Record 1498, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 57–64.
7. Meyer M. D. Charge to the Conference. In Conference Proceedings 17: Intermodal Transportation Education and Training, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 15–16.
8. Pignataro L. J., and Hoel L. A. College and University Transportation and Logistics Programs. In Conference Proceedings 17: Intermodal Transportation Education and Training, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 60–63.
9. Sussman J. M. Educating the “New Transportation Professional.” ITS Quarterly, Summer 1995, pp. 3–10.
10. Sussman J. M. The New Transportation Faculty: The Evolution to Engineering Systems. Transportation Quarterly, Summer 1999.
11. Handy S., Weston L., Song J., Maria K., Lane D., and Terry J. The Education of Transportation Planning Professionals. Research Report SWUTC/02/167522. Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
12. Krizek K., and Levinson D. Teaching Integrated Land Use–Transportation Planning: Topics, Readings, and Strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, 2005, pp. 304–316.
13. Turnbull K. F. An Analysis of Graduate Transportation Planning Education in the United States. PhD thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station, 1993.
14. Zhou J., and Sööt S. Nationwide Survey of Transportation Planning Courses: Introduction, Findings, and Recommendations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 175–183.
15. Hunter G. J. Understanding Semantics and Ontologies: They're Quite Simple Really—If You Know What I Mean! Transactions in GIS, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002, pp. 83–87.
16. Outcalt C. L., and Skewes-Cox T. E. Involvement, Interaction, and Satisfaction: The Human Environment at HBCUs. The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 25. No. 3, 2002, pp. 331–347.
17. Laird T. F. N., Bridges K., Holmes M. S., Morelon C. L., and Williams J. M. African American and Hispanic Student Engagement at Minority Serving and Predominantly White Institutions. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Nov. 4–7, 2004, Kansas City, Mo.
18. Nielsen–NetRatings. Three out of Four Americans Have Access to the Internet 2004. www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf. Accessed Aug. 26, 2007.
19. Anthony J., and Forkenbrock D. J. Land Use Law in Planning: Practice and Pedagogy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, 2006, pp. 80–91.
20. Brach A., and Wachs M. Earmarking in the U.S. Department of Transportation Research Programs. Transportation Research A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 501–521.
21. Freestone R., Thompson S., and Williams P. Student Experiences of Work-based Learning in Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, 2006, pp. 237–249.
22. Schweitzer L., Marr L., Linford J., and Darby M. A. The Sustainable Mobility Learning Lab. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, forthcoming.
23. Goldstein H. A., Bollens S., Feser E., and Silver C. An Experiment in the Internationalization of Planning Education: The NEURUS Program. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 25, 2006, pp. 349–363.
24. Ali A. K., and Doan P. L. A Survey of Undergraduate Course Syllabi and a Hybrid Course on Global Urban Topics. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, 2006, pp. 226–236.
25. Pezzoli K., and Howe D. Planning Pedagogy and Globalization: A Content Analysis of Syllabi. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, 2001, pp. 365–375.
26. Afshar F. Preparing Planners for a Globalizing World: The Planning School at the University of Guelph. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, 2001, p. 339.
27. Hambleton R. Purpose and Collegiality in Planning Education: An International Perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 26, 2006, pp. 107–117.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jiangping Zhou
School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Lewis Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Lisa Schweitzer
School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Lewis Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 81

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Are Transportation Planning Views Shared by Engineering Students and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Implementation of active learning method in transportation engineering...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. I’m multimodal, aren’t you? How ego-centric anchoring biases experts’ ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The health impacts of traffic-related exposures in urban areas: Unders...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Transportation Engineering Curriculum: Analytic Review of the Literatu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub