Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Integrated Transportation and User Capacity Research in Yosemite National Park: The Numbers Game

Abstract

The broad purpose of user capacity management in national parks is to identify the types and amounts of use that can be accommodated in a park, while desired resource and experiential conditions are maintained. Traffic management and transportation planning in national parks are increasingly recognized as inextricably linked with user capacity management. The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to integrate transportation and user capacity management in Yosemite National Park. The study consisted of three primary components. First, survey research was used to identify visitor-based standards of quality for crowding in Yosemite Valley. Second, regression modeling was used to estimate statistical relationships between inbound vehicle traffic at park entrance stations and visitor use levels at recreation sites in Yosemite Valley. Third, regression model estimates of visitor use at recreation sites in Yosemite Valley were simulated with computer models to estimate the extent of crowding that occurs in the valley as a result of different levels of inbound vehicle traffic at park entrance stations. Simulation results were compared with visitor-based standards to characterize the quality of visitor experiences in Yosemite Valley associated with different volumes of vehicle traffic entering the park. Thus, the results of this study provide an empirical basis for managing vehicle traffic entering the park in a manner that maintains the quality of visitors’ experiences in Yosemite Valley. Further, the approach developed in this study can be adapted to other National Park System units to support integrated transportation planning and user capacity management systemwide.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Leung Y.-F., and Marion J. Recreation Impacts and Management in Wilderness: A State-of-Knowledge Review. In Wilderness Science in a Time of Change, Volume 5: Wilderness Ecosystems, Threats, and Management (Cole D. N., McCool S. F., Borrie W. T., and O'Loughlin J., compilers), Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, 2000, pp. 23–48.
2. Hendee J., and Dawson C. Wilderness Management: Stewardship and Protection of Resources and Values, 3rd ed. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colo., 2002.
3. VERP: The Visitor Experience and Resource Protection Framework: A Handbook for Planners and Managers. National Park Service Technical Report, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1997.
4. Bennetts R., Gross J., Cahill K., McIntyre C., Bingham B., Hubbard A., Cameron L., and Carter S. Linking Monitoring to Management and Planning: Assessment Points as a Generalized Approach. George Wright Forum, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2007, pp. 59–77.
5. Daigle J. Transportation Research Needs in National Parks: A Summary and Exploration of Future Trends. George Wright Forum, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2008, pp. 57–64.
6. McCool S., and Cole D. Thinking and Acting Regionally: Toward Better Decisions About Appropriate Conditions, Standards, and Restrictions on Recreation Use. George Wright Forum, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2001, pp. 85–98.
7. Manning R., Valliere W., Wang B., Lawson S., and Newman P. Estimating Day Use Social Carrying Capacity in Yosemite National Park. Leisure, Vol. 27, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 77–102.
8. Manning R. Parks and Carrying Capacity. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2007.
9. Bates M., Wallace G., and Vaske J. Estimating Visitor Use in Rocky Mountain National Park. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 2007.
10. Gracias-Longares M. Study of Spatial Patterns of Visitors Using Mechanical Counters, GPS, and GIS Technology in the Slough Creek Subregion of Yellowstone National Park. MS thesis. University of Montana, Bozeman, 2005.
11. Titre J., Bates M., and Gumina R. Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks Use Estimation and Visitor Survey Study for the Chautauqua Area. Final Report for Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks, Boulder, Colo., 2004.
12. Vaske J., and Donnelly M. Estimating Visitor Use at Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks: Summer 2004–2006 Comparisons. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 2007.
13. Watson A., Cole D., Turner D., and Reynolds P. Wilderness Recreation Use Estimation: A Handbook of Methods and Systems. U.S. Forest Service (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-56), Ogden, Utah, 2000.
14. Lawson S. Computer Simulation as a Tool for Planning and Management of Visitor Use in Protected Natural Areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2006, pp. 600–617.
15. Lawson S., Manning R., Valliere W., and Wang B. Proactive Monitoring and Adaptive Management of Social Carrying Capacity in Arches National Park: An Application of Computer Simulation Modeling. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 68, 2003, pp. 305–313.
16. Diamond B., Lamperti S., Krahl D., and Nastasi A. Extend, Version 6.0. Imagine That Inc., San Jose, Calif., 2002.
17. Kiser B., Lawson S., and Itami R. Assessing the Reliability of Computer Simulation for Modeling Low-Use Visitor Landscapes. In Monitoring, Simulation, and Management of Visitor Landscapes (Gimblett H., Skov-Petersen H., and Muhar A., eds.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2008.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Steve Lawson
Resource Systems Group, Inc., 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, VT 05001.
Peter Newman
Colorado State University, 1480 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480.
Janet Choi
Resource Systems Group, Inc., 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, VT 05001.
Dave Pettebone
Colorado State University, 1480 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480.
Bret Meldrum
Yosemite National Park, 5083 Forest Road, El Portal, CA 95318.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 91

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 18

  1. Systematic Literature Review on Methods of Assessing Carrying Capacity...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Proof of concept study using GPS-based tracking data to build agent-ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A review of digitalization and sustainability in parks and recreation ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A study of visitor impact management practices and visitor satisfactio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. How much traffic is too much? Finding the right vehicle quota for a sc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Modeling visitor use on high elevation mountain trails: An example fro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Defining and monitoring the quality of shared-use transportation facil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Impact of a Half Dome Cable Permitting Process on Search and Rescue Ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A systems-based approach to address unintended consequences of demand-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Transportation as a protected area management tool: An agent-based mod...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The ecological implications of visitor transportation in parks and pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Travel Model Blind Spots: Importance of Understanding Special Markets ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Extending the Encounter–Norm–Crowding Generalization to Angler Evaluat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Visitor Assessment of the Mandatory Alternative Transportation System ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A visitor use monitoring approach on the Half Dome cables to reduce cr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Multiresolution Network Temporal and Spatial Scheduling Model of Sceni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Modeling the Effects of Shuttle Service on Transportation System Perfo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Using Traffic Simulation Software to Manage Recreational River Boats o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub