Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Life-Cycle Cost Approach to Infrastructure Cost Calculation and Allocation

Abstract

A forward-looking approach to infrastructure cost calculation is presented. The approach assumes a semiprivate infrastructure operator to determine user charges. The calculated tariffs provide an incentive for the operator to maintain and develop further the road network in a sustainable manner. The approach subdivides the road infrastructure network into its individual structures and calculates the asset value of each structure separately. Unit prices for structures are calculated on the basis of information pertaining to the construction cost of recently completed infrastructure investment projects. It is assumed that maintenance and investment decisions are undertaken before the prediction of traffic flows in such a way that influenceable life-cycle cost is minimized. The cost for each user generation is allocated to different user categories on the basis of the principles of cooperative game theory, reconciling fairness and efficiency criteria. The principles of life-cycle cost analysis guarantee that the developed approach is compatible with cost–benefit analysis, engineering design guidelines, and the International Accounting Standards. Compared with traditional infrastructure cost calculation methods, the developed approach allocates a lower percentage of costs to heavy goods vehicles and higher fees to the first user generations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Doll C. Allokation Gemeinsamer Kosten der Straßeninfrastruktur. Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2006.
2. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW). Wegekosten und Wegekostendeckung des Straßen- und Schienenverkehrs in Deutschland im Jahre 1997 (Infrastructure Cost and Cost Recovery for Road and Rail Transport in Germany for the Year 1997). Study on behalf of the German Road Transport and Logistics Association (BGL) and the General German Automobile Club, Berlin, 2000.
3. Enquête Commission. Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe Wegekosten im Bundesverkehrsministerium über die Kosten des Eisenbahn-, Straßen- und Binnenschiffsverkehrs in der BRD (Report of the Commission on Infrastructure Cost on the Cost of Railway, Road and Inland Waterway Transportation in Western Germany). Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Verkehr, Heft 34, Godesberg, Germany, 1969.
4. AASHO. The AASHO Road Test. Report 5, Special Report 61E. Highway Research Board of the NAS-NRC Division of Engineering and Industrial Research, Washington D.C., 1962.
5. Herry M., Sedlacek N., and Schuster M. Wegekostenrechnung österreich 2000. Study on behalf of the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology. Ingenieurbüro Max Herry, Vienna, Austria, 2001.
6. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study. Final report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.
7. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study 2000. Final report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
8. Mearing T., Coffee N., and Morgan M. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Handbook. State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early Development, Juneau, Alaska, 1999.
9. Woodward D. G. Life-Cycle Costing—Theory, Information Acquisition and Application. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1997, pp. 335–344.
10. Bull J. W. Life-Cycle Costing for Construction. Taylor and Francis Publishers, London, 2003.
11. Hawk H. NCHRP Report 483: Bridge Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.
12. Fuller S. K., and Petersen S. R. NIST Handbook 135: Life-Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program. U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1995.
13. Knieps G., Küpper H.-U., and Langen R. Abschreibungen bei Preisänderungen in Stationären und Nicht Stationären Märkten. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 53, 2001, pp. 759–776.
14. Rothengatter W., Liedtke G., and Scholz A. Eigenschaften der ökonomischen Abschreibung (Characteristics of Economic Depreciation). University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008. www.bmvbs.bund.de.
15. Shapley L. S. A Value for n-Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II (Kuhn H. W., and Tucker A. W., eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1953, pp. 307–317.
16. RStO. Richtlinien für die Standardisierung des Oberbaus (Guidelines for the Standardization of Superstructures). FGSV Verlag GmbH, Cologne, Germany, 2001.
17. Littlechild S. C., and Owen G. A Simple Expression of the Shapley Value in a Special Case. Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1973, pp. 370–372.
18. ProgTrans/IWW,. Aktualisierung der Wegekostenrechnung für die Bundesfernstraßen in Deutschland (Update of the Infrastructure Cost Calculation Study for German Trunk Roads), 2007. www.bmvbs.bund.de.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gernot Liedtke
Institute for Economic Policy Research, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Kaiserstr. 12, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Aaron B. Scholz
Institute for Economic Policy Research, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Kaiserstr. 12, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 35

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. An agent-based implementation of freight receiver and carrier collabor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Economics of upgrading gravel roads to Otta seal surface
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Improving power supply design for high speed lines and 2 × 25 systems ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A generalized life-cycle cost model for rail transit: making decisions...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub