Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Improving the Accuracy of Vehicle Reidentification Algorithms by Solving the Assignment Problem

Abstract

Vehicle attributes (e.g., length, sensor signature) collected at upstream and downstream points can be used to reidentify individual vehicles anonymously so that useful quantities such as travel times and origin–destination flows can be estimated. In typical reidentification algorithms, each downstream vehicle is matched to the most “similar” upstream vehicle on the basis of some defined metric. However, this process usually results in matching one upstream vehicle to more than one downstream vehicle, and some upstream vehicles are not assigned to any downstream vehicles. This paper presents a two-stage methodology to alleviate this problem, first by developing a Bayesian method for matching the most similar vehicles and then by defining and solving an assignment problem to ensure that each vehicle is matched only once. The results indicate that the proposed method, when applied to the sample field data collected by automatic vehicle classification and weigh-in-motion sensors, reduces the mismatch error by 15% to 60% and by an overall average of 42%. For the sample data, vehicles are matched with 99% accuracy after the methodology presented here is applied.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sun C., Ritchie S. G., Tsai W., and Jayakrishnan R. Use of Vehicle Signature Analysis and Lexicographic Optimization for Vehicle Reidentification on Freeways. Transportation Research C, Vol. 7, 1999, pp. 167–185.
2. Coifman B., and Cassidy M. Vehicle Reidentification and Travel Time Measurement on Congested Freeways. Transportation Research A, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2002, pp. 899–917.
3. Liu H. X., Oh J. S., and Recker W. Adaptive Signal Control System with Online Performance Measure for a Single Intersection. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1811, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 131–138.
4. Oh C., and Ritchie S. G. Real-Time Inductive-Signature-Based Level of Service for Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1802, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 97–104.
5. Nichols A. P., and Cetin M. Commercial Vehicle Reidentification Using WIM and AVC Data. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
6. Tawfik A. Y., Abdulhai B., Peng A., and Tabib S. M. Using Decision Trees to Improve the Accuracy of Vehicle Signature Reidentification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1886, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 24–33.
7. Kuhn H. W. The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2005, pp. 7–21
8. McLachlan G., and Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
9. Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., and Bubin D. B. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 39, 1997, pp. 1–38.
10. Traffic Monitoring Guide. Publication FHWA-PL-01-021. FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2001.
11. Traffic Data and Analysis Manual. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mecit Cetin
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Old Dominion University, Kaufman Hall 135, Norfolk, VA 23529-0241.
Andrew P. Nichols
Marshall University, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25707.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Comparison of vehicle re-identification models for trucks based on axl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Use of Reidentified Vehicles to Evaluate Differential Calibration Accu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Reidentification of Trucks on Basis of Axle-Spacing Measurements to Fa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Bayesian Models for Reidentification of Trucks Over Long Distances on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub