Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

How Travel Attributes Affect Planning Time Horizon of Activities

Abstract

This study focuses on incorporating the travel attributes (time, cost, and availability of modes) in the activity planning time horizon analysis and presents mixed logit models estimated separately for different activity groups. Although the effects of many other variables are estimated, the focus is on the effects of location (in-home versus out-of-home) and log-sum (measure of travel characteristics) variables. The inclusion of several other variables (household and individual characteristics and activity attributes) allows controlling for many factors affecting this choice and increases the explanatory power of the models. The results of the models reveal that the effects of location and travel characteristics on planning time horizon choice vary among different activity types. Toward a better understanding and quantification of the effects of location and travel attributes, the probabilities of planning the activities in different time horizons are estimated separately for in-home and out-of-home, and with an incremental increase in the logsum. Results reveal that the household obligations and active activities are very sensitive to travel characteristics; therefore, significant changes in the planning and execution of these activities may be expected with changes in the transportation system characteristics. The results of this study enhance the understanding of relationships between travel time, cost, availability of transportation modes, and the activity planning process.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bhat C. R., and Koppelman F. S. A Retrospective and Prospective Survey of Time-Use Research. Transportation, Vol. 26, 1999, pp. 119–139.
2. Kitamura R., Fujii S., and Pas E. I. Time-Use Data, Analysis and Modeling: Toward the Next Generation of Transportation Planning Methodologies. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, 1997, pp. 225–235.
3. Doherty S. T. How Far in Advance Are Activities Planned? Measurement Challenges and Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 41–49.
4. Doherty S. T., Miller E. J., Axhausen K. W., and Gärling T. A Conceptual Model of the Weekly Household Activity-Travel Scheduling Process. In Travel Behaviour: Patterns, Implications and Modelling (Stern E., Salomon I., and Bovy P., eds.), Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 2001, pp. 148–165.
5. Mohammadian A. K., and Doherty S. T. Modeling Activity Scheduling Time Horizon: Duration of Time Between Planning and Execution of Pre-Planned Activities. Transportation Research, Part A (Policy and Practice), Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 475–490.
6. Mohammadian A., and Doherty S. T. Mixed Logit Model of Activity Scheduling Time Horizon Incorporating Spatial–Temporal Flexibility Variables. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 33–40.
7. Roorda M. J., Saneinejad S., and Miller E. J. Analysis of Routine Weekly Activity/Travel Patterns. Presented at 11th World Conference on Transportation Research (WCTR), University of California, Berkeley, June 24–29, 2007.
8. Miller E. J., and Roorda M. J. Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114–121.
9. Doherty S. T. Should We Abandon Activity Type Analysis? Redefining Activities by Their Salient Attributes. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 517–536.
10. Mokhtarian P. L., Salomon I., and Handy S. L. The Impacts of ICT on Leisure Activities and Travel: A Conceptual Exploration. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 263–289.
11. Ettema D., and Timmermans H. J. P. Theories and Models of Activity Patterns. In Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (Dick E., and Timmermans H. J. P., eds.), Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997, pp. 1–36.
12. McNally M. G. The Activity Based Approach. Paper UCI-ITS-AS-WP-00-4. Institute of Transportation Studies Center for Activity Systems Analysis, University of California, Irvine, 2000.
13. Pas E. I., and Harvey A. S. Time Use Research and Travel Demand Analysis and Modeling. In Understanding Travel Behavior in an Era of Change (Stopher P., and Gosselin M. L., eds.), Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1996.
14. Lee-Gosselin M., Rondier P., and Miranda–Moreno L. The Evolution of Perceived Spatio-Temporal Flexibility in Activity Patterns. Presented at 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
15. Akar G., Clifton J. K., and Doherty S. T. Discretionary Activity Location Choice: An Examination of Temporal Dimensions and Activity Attributes of In-Home or Out-of-Home Location Choice. Presented at World Conference on Transportation Research (WCTR), University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
16. Roorda M. J., Miller E. J., and Habib K. M. N. Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Microsimulation Model. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
17. Arentze T. A., and Timmermans H. J. P. A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 613–633.
18. Doherty S. T., Nemeth E., Roorda M., and Miller E. J. Computerized Household Activity-Scheduling Survey for Toronto, Canada, Area: Design and Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 140–149.
19. Doherty S. T. Rules for Assessing Data Quality of Activity-Scheduling Survey Respondents. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1870, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 109–115.
20. Bowman J. L., and Ben-Akiva M. E. Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 1–28.
21. Cirillo C., and Axhausen K. Dynamic Model of Activity-Type Choice and Scheduling. Transportation, forthcoming.
22. McFadden D., and Train K. Mixed Multinomial Logit Models of Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, 2000, pp. 447–470.
23. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002.
24. Bowman J. L., and Ben-Akiva M. E. Activity Based Travel Forecasting. Presented at Activity Based Travel Forecasting Conference, New Orleans, La., 1996.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gulsah Akar
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College Park, MD 20742.
Kelly J. Clifton
National Center for Smart Growth, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Sean T. Doherty
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 21

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. An Episode-Level Joint Model for Activity Engagement, Duration, and De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Schedulin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Redefining activity types: Who participates in which leisure activity?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Young-Old Elderly and Baby Boomers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Assessing planning decisions by activity type during the scheduling pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub