Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Work Departure Time Analysis Using Dogit Ordered Generalized Extreme Value Model

Abstract

This paper applies a discrete choice modeling technique to investigate departure time choice for individual workers residing in the New York City metropolitan area. This effort is distinguished from previous departure time models primarily by the use of the dogit ordered generalized extreme value (DOGEV) model rather than the commonly used multinomial logit (MNL) model. The MNL model is restrictive in cases in which the continuous time needs to be discretized into departure time intervals. Because the MNL model treats departure time intervals as independent alternatives, the model cannot account for the ordering of the time intervals and their correlation. In contrast, the DOGEV model has two distinct features. First, it recognizes the ordinal nature of the departure time intervals by allowing them to be correlated in vicinity (i.e., time intervals that are close to each other in the ordering have error terms that are correlated). Second, it allows a worker's departure time choice to be captive or constrained to a particular departure time interval. The modeling approach was based on a behavioral analysis that explained the factors influencing work departure time decisions in a highly urbanized environment. The results of the model estimation provide valuable insights into the effects, on a worker's departure time choice, of socio-economic characteristics, employment characteristics, travel-related attributes, and land use and location attributes. Empirical application also shows that New York metropolitan travel survey data were well modeled by the DOGEV with both significant captivity and ordering components. In particular, evidence of ordering and proximate covariance in the choice set may suggest an additional source of misspecification in the existing departure time literature, which has focused largely on unordered discrete choice models, such as multinomial logit and nested logit.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Fry T. R. L., and Harris M. N. The Dogit Ordered Generalized Extreme Value Model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2005, pp. 531–542.
2. Abkowitz M. D. An Analysis of the Commuter Departure Time Decision. Transportation, Vol. 10, 1981, pp. 283–297.
3. Small K. A. The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1982, pp. 467–479.
4. Hendrickson C., and Plank E. The Flexibility of Departure Times for Work Trips. Transportation Research, Vol. 18A, 1984, pp. 25–36.
5. Chin A. T. H. Influences on Commuter Trip Departure Time Decisions in Singapore. Transportation Research, Vol. 24A, 1990, pp. 321–333.
6. Komma A., and Srinivasan S. Modeling Home-to-Work Commute-Timing Decisions of Workers with Flexible Work Schedules. Paper presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
7. Bhat C. R., and Steed J. L. A Continuous-Time Model of Departure Time Choice for Urban Shopping Trips. Transportation Research, Vol. 36B, 2002, pp. 207–224.
8. Okola A. Departure Time Choice for Recreational Activities by Elderly Nonworkers. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
9. Tringides C. A., Ye X., and Pendyala R. M. Departure-Time Choice and Mode Choice for Nonwork Trips: Alternative Formulations of Joint Model Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1898, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 1–9.
10. Saleh W., and Farrell S. Implications of Congestion Charging for Departure Time Choice: Work and Non-Work Schedule Flexibility. Transportation Research, Vol. 39A, 2005, pp. 773–791.
11. de Jong G., Daly A., Pieters M., Vellay C., Bradley M., and Hofman F. A Model for Time of Day and Mode Choice Using Error Components Logit. Transportation Research, Vol. 39E, 2003, pp. 245–268.
12. Mannering F. L. Poisson Analysis of Commuter Flexibility in Changing Routes and Departure Times. Transportation Research, Vol. 23B, 1989, pp. 35–47.
13. de Palma A., Khattak A. J., and Gupta D. Commuters’ Departure Time Decisions in Brussels, Belgium. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 139–146.
14. Gadda S. C., Kockelman K. M., and Damien P. Continuous Departure Time Model: A Bayesian Approach. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
15. Polak J., Jones P. M., Vythoulkas P., Sheldon R., and Wofinder D. Travelers’ Choice of Time of Travel Under Road Pricing. Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.
16. Bhat C. R. Analysis of Travel Mode and Departure Time Choice for Urban Shopping Trips. Transportation Research, Vol. 32B, 1998, pp. 361–371.
17. Bajwa S., Bekhor S., Kuwahara M., and Chung E. Discrete Choice Modeling of Combined Mode and Departure Time. Presented at 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
18. Caplice C., and Mahmassani H. S. Aspects of Commuting Behavior: Preferred Arrival Time, Use of Information and Switching Propensity. Transportation Research, Vol. 26A, 1992, pp. 409–418.
19. Wang J. J. Timing Utility of Daily Activities and Its Impact on Travel. Transportation Research, Vol. 30A, 1996, pp. 189–206.
20. Ettema D., and Timmermans H. Modeling Departure Time Choice in the Context of Activity Scheduling Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 39–46.
21. Polak J. Travel Time Variability and Departure Time Choice: A Utility Theoretic Approach. Discussion Paper No. 15. Transport Studies Group, Polytechnic of Central London, 1987.
22. Noland R. B., Small K. A., Koskenoja P. M., and Chu X. Simulating Travel Reliability. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 28, 1998, pp. 535–564.
23. Bates J., Polak J., Jones P., and Cook A. The Valuation of Reliability for Personal Travel. Transportation Research, Vol. 37E, 2001, pp. 191–229.
24. Mahmassani H. S., and Chang G. L. Experiments with Departure Time Choice Dynamics of Urban Commuters. Transportation Research, Vol. 20B, 1986, pp. 297–320.
25. Van der Zijpp N., and Koolstra K. Multiclass Continuous-Time Equilibrium Model for Departure Time Choice on Single-Bottleneck Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1783, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 134–141.
26. Jou R. C., Kitamura R., Weng M. C., and Chen C. C. Dynamic Commuter Departure Time Choice Under Uncertainty. Transportation Research, Vol. 42A, 2008, pp. 774–783.
27. Swait J. D., and Ben-Akiva M. Empirical Test of a Constrained Choice Discrete Model, Mode Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research, Vol. 21B, 1987, pp. 103–115.
28. Gaudry M., and Dagenais M. The Dogit Model. Transportation Research, Vol. 13B, 1979, pp. 105–112.
29. Manski C. The Structure of Random Utility Models. Theory Decision, Vol. 8, 1977, pp. 229–254.
30. Small K. A. A Discrete Choice Model for Ordered Alternatives. Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1987, pp. 409–424.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

You-Lian Chu
Parsons Transportation Group, 100 Broadway, New York, NY 10005.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 37

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 11

  1. Finite-Mixture Continuous Logit Model: Formulation and Application for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Dogit model and rational inattention
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Predicting Lessee Switch Behavior using Logit Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A multi-modal network equilibrium model with captive mode choice and p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Modeling departure time choice of metro passengers with a smart correc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Myopic choice or rational decision making? An investigation into mode ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Automobile Ownership Model That Incorporates Captivity and Proximate C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Cross-Nested Joint Model of Travel Mode and Departure Time Choice for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evolution of latent modal captivity and mode choice patterns for commu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modelling departure time choices by a Heteroskedastic Generalized Logi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Dynamic traffic assignment: model classifications and recent advances ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub