Understanding and Accommodating Risk and Uncertainty in Toll Road Projects: A Review of the Literature
Abstract
Forecasting traffic and toll revenues for new highway projects involves great uncertainty because of the inherent uncertainty in the models used to make forecasts. As private investment becomes more common in project financing, quantifying the levels of risk and uncertainty associated with such projects becomes critical. This paper represents a review of many key studies and reports dealing with uncertainty in traffic and revenue forecasts for highway projects. These studies found that tolled projects tend to suffer from substantial optimism bias in forecasts, with predicted traffic volumes exceeding actual volumes by 30% or more about half the time. Moreover, projects with greater uncertainty tend to overestimate Year 1 traffic volumes more and stabilize at lower final traffic volumes. But after one controls for added optimism bias in traffic forecasts (compared with nontolled projects), there is little difference in uncertainty levels between tolled and nontolled forecasts. A typical way to address uncertainty in traffic forecasts is through sensitivity testing via variations in key inputs and parameters. A more extensive and less arbitrary version of this, Monte Carlo simulation, can provide probability distributions of future traffic and revenue, although it tends to require many simulations, demanding greater computational effort and time, unless networks are streamlined. Nonetheless, if reasonable assumptions for model input and parameter distributions can be made, Monte Carlo simulation generates a variety of useful information and establishes the actual likelihood of loss (rather than more basic win–lose indicators from a limited set of stress tests).
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Flyvbjerg B., Skamris Holm M. K., and Buhl S. L. How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects: The Case of Transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2005, pp. 131–146.
2. Flyvbjerg B., Skamris Holm M. K., and Buhl S. L. Inaccuracy in Traffic Forecasts. Transport Reviews, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1–24.
3. Bain R., and Wilkins M. Infrastructure Finance: Traffic Risk in StartUp Toll Facilities. Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill International Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, Sept. 2002.
4. Bain R., and Plantagie J. W. Traffic Forecasting Risk: Study Update 2003. Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill International Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, Nov. 2003.
5. Bain R., and Plantagie J. W. Traffic Forecasting Risk: Study Update 2004. Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill International Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, Oct. 2004.
6. Bain R., and Polakovic L. Traffic Forecasting Risk Study Update 2005: Through Ramp-Up and Beyond. Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill International Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, Aug. 2005.
7. George C., Streeter W., and Trommer S. Bliss, Heartburn, and Toll Road Forecasts. Project Finance Special Report. Fitch Ratings, Nov. 2003.
8. George C., Trommer S., McDermott M., Zurita G., Lewis C., Monnier L., Streeter W., Lopez E., and Fuenalida C. Global Toll Road Rating Guidelines. Criteria report. Fitch Ratings, March 2007.
9. Vassallo J. M., and Baeza M. A. Why Traffic Forecasts in PPP Contracts Are Often Overestimated. Final draft. EIB University Research Sponsorship Programme, European Investment Bank, Luxembourg, 2007.
10. Land Transport New Zealand. Risk Analysis, appendix A13. In Economic Evaluation Manual, Vol. 1, 2006. www.ltsa.govt.nz/funding/economic-evaluation-manual/eem1-1.pdf.
11. Zhao Y., and Kockelman K. M. The Propagation of Uncertainty Through Travel Demand Models: An Exploratory Analysis. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2002, pp. 145–163.
12. Rodier C. J. Verifying the Accuracy of Regional Models Used in Transportation and Air Quality Planning. Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) Report 02–03. College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, Calif., 2003. transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/02-03.pdf. Accessed June 2008.
13. Pradhan A., and Kockelman K. M. Uncertainty Propagation in an Integrated Land Use–Transportation Modeling Framework: Output Variation Via UrbanSIM. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 128–135.
14. Rodier C. J., and Johnston R. A. Uncertain Socioeconomic Projections Used in Travel Demand Model and Emissions Models: Could Plausible Errors Result in Air Quality Nonconformity? Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 613–631.
15. Krishnamurthy S., and Kockelman K. M. Propagation of Uncertainty in Transportation Land Use Models: Investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP Predictions in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 219–229.
16. Rodier C. J. Verifying the Accuracy of Land Use Models Used in Transportation and Air Quality Planning: A Case Study in the Sacramento, California, Region. Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) Report 05-02. College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, Calif., 2005. http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/05-02.pdf. Accessed June 2008
17. Clay M. J., and Johnston R. A. Multivariate Uncertainty Analysis of an Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model: MEPLAN. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 11, 2006, pp. 191–203.
18. Sevcikova H., Raftery A. E., and Waddell P. A. Assessing Uncertainty in Urban Simulations Using Bayesian Melding. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 652–669.
19. Kockelman K. M., Duthie J., Kakaraparthi S. K., Zhou B., Anjomani A., and Marepally S. An Examination of Land Use Models, Emphasizing UrbanSim, TELUM, and Suitability Analysis. Research Report 0-5667-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
20. HLB Decision Economics, Inc. Toll Road Project Risk Analysis. Presentation for MBIA Insurance Corporation, 2004.
21. Perez B. G., and Sciara G. C. A Guide for HOT Lane Development. Publication Number FHWA-OP-03-009. Report prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff with the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) for FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
22. Poole R. W. Tolling and Public–Private Partnerships in Texas: Separating Myth from Fact. Reason Foundation working paper. May 2007. www.reason.org/TX_toll_roads_working_paper.pdf. Accessed Aug 2007.
23. Ortiz I. N., Buxbaum J. N., and Little R. Protecting the Public Interest: The Role of Long-Term Concession Agreements for Providing Transportation Infrastructure. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2079, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 88–95.
24. Duthie J. Implications of Uncertain Future Network Performance on Satisfying Environmental Justice and Tolling. PhD thesis. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
25. Rodier C. J. Beyond Uncertainty: Modeling Transportation, Land Use, and Air Quality in Planning. Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) Report 07-01. College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, Calif., 2007. http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/07-01.pdf. Accessed June 2008.
26. Kriger D., Shiu S., and Naylor S. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 364: Estimating Toll Road Demand and Revenue. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
27. S.R. 125 South Toll Road Project: Risk Analysis of Traffic and Toll Revenue Forecasts. Draft final report. HLB Decision Economics, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2003.
28. Ashley D. J. Uncertainty in the Context of Highway Appraisal. Transportation, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 249–267.
29. Lowe S., Morrell D., Copley G. Uncertainties in Highway Appraisal: The Development of Systematic Sensitivity Testing. Presented at Planning and Transport, Research and Computation (PTRC) Summer Annual Meeting (SAM), University of Warwick, United Kingdom, 1982.
30. Lam W. H. K., and Tam M. L. Risk Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Forecasts for Road Investment Projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1998, pp. 19–27.
31. Boyce A. M., and Bright M. J. Reducing or Managing the Forecasting Risk in Privately Financed Projects. Presented at European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, 2003.
32. Beser Hugosson M. Quantifying Uncertainties in a National Forecasting Model. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2005, pp. 531–547.
33. de Jong G., Daly A., Pieters M., Miller S., Plasmeijer R., and Hofman F. Uncertainty in Traffic Forecasts: Literature Review and New Results for the Netherlands. Transportation, Vol. 34, 2007, pp. 375–395.
34. National Federation of Municipal Analysts. Recommended Best Practices in Disclosure for Toll Road Financings. 2005. www.nfma.org/disclosure/rbp_toll_road.pdf. Accessed July 2008.
35. Bain R., Forsgren K., and Calder P. B. Credit FAQ: Assessing the Credit Quality of Highly Leveraged Deep-Future Toll-Road Concessions. Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill International Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, Feb. 2006.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 134
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 26
- Finite-Mixture Continuous Logit Model: Formulation and Application for...
- Delivery methods, risk sharing, standards and performance for construc...
- The Impact of Snowfall on Crashes, Traffic Volume, and Revenue on the ...
- Estimating the uncertainty of traffic forecasts from their historical ...
- A Sustainable Evaluation Processes for Investments in the Transport Se...
- Risk management by SPV partners in toll road public private partnershi...
- Support for and Behavioral Responses to Tolls
- Evaluating the sustainability of urban passenger transportation by Mon...
- Assessing Sukuk defaults using value-at-ri...
- Measuring Impacts and Risks to the Public of a Privately Operated Toll...
- Evaluation of Traffic and Revenue Risks of Toll Roads and Managed Lane...
- Evaluating Toll Revenue Uncertainty Using Neural Network Models
- Dynamic demand risk assessment for toll road projects
- Measuring uncertainty in discrete choice travel demand forecasting mod...
- Financial Stress Testing of Toll Road Projects: The Effe...
- Exploring Model and Behavior Uncertainty: Temporal Transferability Ass...
- Incorporating Risk and Uncertainty in Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Selection bias in build-operate-transfer transportation project apprai...
- Dealing with Traffic Risk in Latin American Toll Roads
- A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decisio...
- Methods for Quantitative Risk Analysis for Travel Demand Model Forecas...
- Evaluation of a Strategic Road Pricing Scheme Accounting for Day-to-Da...
- Travel demand estimation risk for high-speed railway transport conside...
- Hubris or humility? Accuracy issues for the next 50 years of travel de...
- A Bivariate Multinomial Probit Model for Trip Scheduling: Bayesian Ana...
- Outcome of Transportation Projects under Uncertainty: Examination of B...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
