Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Sensitivity Testing with the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model

Abstract

Oregon has a long history of developing and using integrated economic, land use–transport models. Development of the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model (SWIM) was commissioned by the Oregon Department of Transportation as part of its Transportation and Land Use Model Improvement Program within the larger Oregon Modeling Improvement Program. The first version model, now named SWIM1, has been used in numerous applications since the late 1990s. A more extensive second version, SWIM2, is now available. It uses the PECAS economic input–output activity allocation framework, an aggregate model of spatial development and microsimulation models of freight and person transport. This paper describes the work considered in the later stages of development of the SWIM2 model, including results of sensitivity testing and reports on concurrent actions to transfer the model to agency operation. The sensitivity tests considered three alternative scenarios covering the evolution of the statewide spatial economic and transport systems over a 19-year period. Each scenario was compared to a reference case. In one scenario, highway capacity was increased substantially along an Interstate corridor radiating out from the Portland metropolitan area for more than 100 mi. In the other two scenarios, the costs for vehicle travel were increased four- and 10-fold over 1998 costs. The model system was found to respond consistent with a priori expectations. Population and employment shift to areas of comparatively better accessibilities, urban densities change, trip lengths and modes change, and floor space development and prices respond to these changes in patterns that evolve across the state over time.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wegener M. Operational Urban Models: State of the Art. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 60, Issue 1, Winter 1994, pp. 17–30.
2. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. NCHRP Report 423A: Land Use Impacts of Transportation: A Guidebook. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
3. United Kingdom Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance, Land-Use/Transport Interaction Models, TAG Unit 3.1.3, June 2003. www.webtag.org.uk.
4. Hunt J. D., Kriger D. S., and Miller E. J. Current Operational Urban Land-Use-Transport Modelling Frameworks: A Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 25, No. 3, May 2005, pp. 329–376.
5. Chang J. S. Models of the Relationship Between Transport and Land-Use: A Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 26, No. 3, May 2006, pp. 325–350.
6. Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Development Division, Transportation Planning Analysis Unit. Oregon Modeling Improvement Program—Statewide Model. Presentation to the Oregon Transportation Commission, May 2001.
7. de la Barra T. The Mathematical and Algorithmic Structure of TRANUS. 1998. www.modelistica.com.
8. Parsons Brinckerhoff and MW Consulting. Transportation and Land Use Model Integration Program: Overview of the First Generation Models. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Aug. 2001. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/GEN1/01FedRpt.pdf.
9. Waddell P.et al. Longitudinal Calibration of UrbanSim for Eugene–Springfield. Technical Report. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2000. www.state.or.us/tddtpau/modeling.html.
10. Transportation Planning Analysis Unit. Study of Eastern Oregon Freeway Alternatives Pursuant to House Bill 3090. Oregon Department of Transportation, April 2001. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/Gen1/HB3090.pdf.
11. Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Analysis Unit; Parsons Brinckerhoff; and MW Consulting. Modeling Analysis of Willamette Valley Transportation and Land Use Alternatives. Willamette Valley Forum Alternative Transportation Futures Project, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 2001. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/Gen1/SMAPfinal.pdf.
12. Newburg–Dundee Bypass Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Induced Growth Analysis, Modeling Methodology and Results. Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Analysis Unit, Salem, Jan. 23, 2002. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/Gen1/NewbergDundee.pdf.
13. Economic Bridge Options Team. Economic and Bridge Options Report. Oregon Transportation Commission, Salem, Jan. 15, 2003. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/Gen1/EconBridgeRpt.pdf. Technical modeling report: www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/Gen1/btmaboTR.pdf.
14. Oregon Transportation Plan. Technical Appendix 4: Analysis Scenarios. Oregon Department of Transportation, Sept. 26, 2006. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/ortransplanupdate.shtml.
15. Hunt J. D., Donnelly R., Abraham J. E., Batten C., Freedman J., Hicks J., Costinett P. J., and Upton W. J. Design of a Statewide Land Use Transport Interaction Model for Oregon. World Conference on Transport Research, 2001. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/GEN2/OG2D_WCTR.pdf.
16. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., University of Washington, EcoNorthwest, and KJS Associates, Inc. Proposed Design of a Second Generation Land Use–Transport Model for Oregon. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, July 1999. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/GEN2/DespairDesign.pdf.
17. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., University of Washington, EcoNorthwest, and KJS Associates, Inc. Revised Design of a Second Generation Land Use–Transport Model for Oregon. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Feb. 2000. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/GEN2/redesign.pdf.
18. PB Consult, HBA Specto, and EcoNorthwest. Oregon2 Transitional Model, Model Description at Finalization, Version 1.2. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, May 2005.
19. Oregon Symposiums, 1998–2008. Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Analysis Unit, Salem. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TPAU/Symposiums.shtml#Fifth_Symposium___2008.
20. MW Consulting and PB Consult, Inc. The Oregon Modeling Improvement Program: An Overview. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, June 2002. www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TMR/General/omipOverview.pdf.
21. Hunt J. D., and Abraham J. E. Design and Implementation of PECAS: A Generalized System for the Allocation of Economic Production, Exchange, and Consumption Quantities. In Foundations of Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Assumptions and New Conceptual Frameworks. Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005, pp. 217–238.
22. Abraham J. E., and Hunt J. D. Random Utility Location, Production, and Exchange Choice: Additive Logit Model; and Spatial Choice Micro-simulations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1–6.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tara Weidner
Parsons Brinckerhoff, 400 Southwest Sixth Avenue, Suite 802, Portland, OR 97204-1412.
Becky Knudson
Oregon Department of Transportation, 555 13th Street Northeast, Salem, OR 97301-4178.
Rosella Picado
Parsons Brinckerhoff, 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, WA 98104.
J. D. Hunt
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Inference of activity patterns from urban sensing data using condition...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Estimating Space Rents and Land Values in Alberta
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. DEVELOPING AN AUTOMATED METHOD FOR THE APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN IUMAT L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Household Behaviour in the Oregon2 Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub