Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Multistate Nonhomogeneous Semi-Markov Model of Daily Activity Type, Timing, and Duration Sequence

Abstract

Understanding travelers’ daily travel activity pattern formation is an important issue for activity-based travel-demand analysis. The activity pattern formation concerns not only complex interrelations between household members and individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics but also urban form and transport system settings. To investigate the effects of these attributes and the interrelationship between conducted activities, a multistate semi-Markov model is applied. The underlying assumption of the proposed model is that the state transition probability depends on its adjoining states. The statistical tests of significance affirm that the duration of activity depends not only on its beginning time of day but also on the duration of travel or activity previously conducted. An empirical study based on the Belgian mobility survey is conducted to estimate individuals’ daily activity durations of different episodes and provides useful insight for the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, urban and transportation system settings on the activity pattern formation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chapin F. S. The Study of Urban Activity Systems. Urban Land Use Planning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1965.
2. Hemmens G. C. Analysis and Simulation of Urban Activity Patterns. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 4. No. 1, 1970, pp. 53–66.
3. Arentze T., and Timmermans H. J. P. A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2004. pp. 613–633.
4. Bhat C. R., Srinivasan S., and Axhausen K. W. An Analysis of Multiple Interepisode Durations Using a Unifying Multivariate Hazard Model. Transportation Research B, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 797–823.
5. Lee Y., Hickman M., and Washington S. Household Type and Structure, Time-Use Pattern, and Trip-Chaining Behavior. Transportation Research A, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 1004–1020.
6. Recker W. W., McNally M. G., and Root G. S. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior, Part 1: Theoretical Development. Transportation Research A, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 307–318.
7. Recker W. W., McNally M. G., and Root G. S. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior, Part 2: An Operational Model. Transportation Research A, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 319–330.
8. Ettema D., Borgers A., and Timmermans H. J. P. Competing Risk Hazard Model of Activity Choice: Timing, Sequencing, and Duration. In Transportation Research Record 1493, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 101–109.
9. Bhat C. R. A Hazard-Based Duration Model of Shopping Activity with Nonparametric Baseline Specification and Nonparametric Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity. Transportation Research B, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1996, pp. 189–207.
10. Lee B., and Timmermans H. J. P. A Latent Class Accelerated Hazard Model of Activity Episode Durations. Transportation Research B, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2007, pp. 426–447.
11. Bhat C. R. A Generalized Multiple Durations Proportional Hazard Model with an Application to Activity Behavior During the Evening Work-to-Home Commute. Transportation Research B, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1996, pp. 465–480.
12. Srinivasan K. K., and Guo Z. Analysis of Trip and Stop Duration for Shopping Activities: Simultaneous Hazard Duration Model System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 1–11.
13. Pendyala R. M., and Bhat C. R. An Exploration of the Relationship Between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities. Transportation, Vol. 31, 2004, pp. 429–456.
14. Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L., and Timmermans H. Unconditional and Conditional Competing Risk Models of Activity Duration and Activity Sequencing Decisions: An Empirical Comparison. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 4, 2002, pp. 157–170.
15. Lee B., Timmermans H. J. P., Junyi Z., and Fujiwara A. A Generalized Multi-State Hidden Markov Extension Model for Multi-State Activity Episode Duration. Proc., 11th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
16. Hougaard P. Multi-State Models: A Review. Lifetime Data Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1999, pp. 239–264.
17. Dabrowska D. M., Sun G. W., and Horowitz M. M. Cox Regression in a Markov Renewal Model: An Application to the Analysis of Bone Marrow Transplant Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, No. 427, 1994, pp. 867–877.
18. Putter H., Hage J. van der, de Bock G. H., Elgalta R., and van de Velde C. J. H. Estimation and Prediction in a Multi-State Model for Breast Cancer. Biometrical Journal, Vol. 48, 2006, pp. 366–380.
19. Cox D. R. Regression Models and Life Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, Vol. 34, 1972, pp. 187–200.
20. Kalbfleisch J. D., and Prentice R. L. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
21. Breslow N. E. Covariance Analysis of Censored Survival Data. Biometrics, Vol. 30, 1974, pp. 89–99.
22. Efron B. The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 72, 1977, pp. 557–565.
23. Lin D. Y., Wei L. J., and Ying Z. Checking the Cox Model with Cumulative Sums of Martingale-Based Residuals. Biometrika, Vol. 80, 1993, pp. 557–572.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tai-Yu Ma
Laboratoire d'Economie des Transports, CNRS-Université de Lyon, 14, Avenue Berthelot, F-69363 Lyon, France.
Charles Raux
Laboratoire d'Economie des Transports, CNRS-Université de Lyon, 14, Avenue Berthelot, F-69363 Lyon, France.
Eric Cornelis
Groupe de recherche sur les transports, FUNDP, Rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium.
Iragaël Joly
Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble, INPG–ENSGI–CUEFA, Université Pierre Mendès France, BP47 38040 Grenoble, France.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 25

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. A Hybrid Algorithm for Fast Learning Individual Daily Activity Plans f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Travel and activity time allocation: An empirical comparison between e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub