Simultaneous Model for Household Interactions in Daily Activity, Information and Communication, and Social Behavior
Abstract
This paper describes the development, estimation, and interpretation of a simultaneous structural equations model relating sociodemographics, household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home physical and virtual activity participation, social interactions (measured by with whom the activities are performed), use of telecommunication, and travel behavior. The model is unique in its simultaneous representation of each decision maker's choices about participation patterns for solo and joint with-whom in-home and out-of-home physical and virtual activities, and the complex set of structural relationships among such patterns, and household and individual sociodemographics. The empirical model was estimated by using data from a recent 2-day activity and travel diary survey conducted in the Cairo, Egypt, region. The results highlight the influence of sociodemographics, household traditions, beliefs, social roles, and lifestyle on individuals’ solo- and joint-activity patterns. Furthermore, the results showed a significant trade-off between joint and solo participation for both in-home and out-of-home activity participation. In contrast, significant complementary relationships were found between joint in-home virtual activities and joint out-of-home activities. Furthermore, this study provides another justification for the holistic and comprehensive approach to studying the interrelationships between information and communication technologies and household interactions in daily activity and travel behavior. The results revealed complementary relationships between joint activity participation and telecommunication use. These results have important implications for estimation and forecasting of activity travel demand, given the significant household interaction patterns, especially for people of Cairo.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Bhat C. R., and Koppelman F. S. A Retrospective and Prospective Survey of Time-Use Research. Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1999, pp. 119–139.
2. Pendyala R., and Goulias K. G. Time-Use and Activity Perspectives in Travel Behavior Research. Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1–4.
3. Gärling T. K., Kwan M. P., and Golledge R. Computational-Process Modelling of Household Activity Scheduling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 28, 1994, pp. 355–364.
4. Gärling T., Kalén T., Romanus J., Selart M., and Vilhelmsson B. Computer Simulation of Household Activity Scheduling. Environment and Planning Part A, Vol. 30, 1998, pp. 665–679.
5. Ettema D., Borgers A., and Timmermans H. J. P. Simulation Model of Activity Scheduling Behavior. In Transportation Research Record 1413, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 1–11.
6. Axhausen K. W., and Gärling T. Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis: Conceptual Frameworks, Models, and Research Problems. Transport Reviews, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1992, pp. 323–341.
7. Ettema D., and Timmermans H. Theories and Models of Activity Patterns. Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (Ettema D., and Timmermans H., eds.), Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997, pp. 1–36.
8. Bowman J. L., and Ben-Akiva M. E. Day Activity Schedule Approach to Travel Demand Analysis. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.
9. Golob T. F., and McNally M. G. A Model of Activity Participation and Travel Interactions Between the Household Heads. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1997, pp. 177–194.
10. Meka S., Pendyala R. M., and Kumara M. A. W. Structural Equations Analysis of Within-Household Activity and Time Allocation Between Two Adults. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
11. Fujii S., Kitamura R., and Kishizawa K. Analysis of Individuals’ Joint Activity Engagement Using a Model System of Activity–Travel Behavior and Time Use. In Transportation Research Record 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 11–19.
12. Vovsha P., Peterson E., and Donnelly R. Model for Allocation of Maintenance Activities to Household Members. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washingtom, D.C., 2004, pp. 170–179.
13. Scott D. M., and Kanaroglou P. S. An Activity-Episode Generation Model that Captures Interactions Between Household Heads: Development and Empirical Analysis. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2002, pp. 875–896.
14. Wen C.-H., and Koppelman F. S. Integrated Model System of Stop Generation and Tour Formation for the Analysis of Activity and Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 136–144.
15. Srinivasan S., and Bhat C. R. Modeling Household Interactions in Daily In-Home and Out-of-Home Maintenance Activity Participation. Transportation, Vol. 32, 2005, pp. 523–544.
16. Zhang J., Timmermans H. J. P., and Borgers A. Model Structure Kernel for Household Task and Time Allocation Incorporating Household Interaction and Interactivity Dependency. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
17. Zhang J., and Fujiwara A. Representing Household Time Allocation Behavior by Endogenously Incorporating Diverse Intra-Household Interactions: A Case Study in the Context of Elderly Couples. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2006, pp. 54–74.
18. Mokhtarian P. L., and Salomon I. Emerging Travel Patterns: Do Telecommunications Make a Difference? In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Pergamon, London, 2002, pp. 143–182.
19. Lund J. R., and Mokhtarian P. L. Telecommuting and Residential Location: Theory and Implications for Commute Travel in Monocentric Metropolis. In Transportation Research Record 1463, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 10–14.
20. Salomon I. Telecommunications, Cities, and Technological Opportunism. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 30, 1996, pp. 75–90.
21. Graham S., and Marvin S. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. Routledge, London, 1996.
22. Mosa A. I. Activity-Based Modeling: Intra-Household Interaction, Attitudes, and Telecommunication. Unpublished master's dissertation. University of Tokyo, 2006.
23. Phase I Final Report, Volume II: Urban Transport Policy and Strategy. Pacific Consultants International, Tamashi, Japan, Nov. 2002.
24. Lu X., and Pas E. I. Socio-Demographics, Activity Participation and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1991, pp. 1–18.
25. Golob T. F. A Simultaneous Model of Household Activity Participation and Trip Chain Generation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2000, pp. 355–376.
26. Kuppam A. R., and Pendyala R. M. A Structural Equations Analysis of Commuters’ Activity and Travel Patterns. Transportation, Vol. 28, 2001, pp. 33–54.
27. Gliebe J. P., and Koppelman F. S. A Model of Joint Activity Participation Between Household Members. Transportation, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 49–72.
28. Bhat C. R., and Gossen R. A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Weekend Recreational Episode Type Choice. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2004, pp. 767–787.
29. Bollen K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley, New York, 1989.
30. Golob T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1–25.
31. Golob T. F., and Regan A. C. Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-Enabled Devices. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
32. Jöreskog K. G., and Sörbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, Ill., 2001.
33. Jöreskog K. G. Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables Using LISREL, 2005. www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf. Accessed Jan. 7, 2008.
34. Ullman J. B. Structural Equation Modeling. In Using Multivariate Statistics (Tabachnick G. B., and Fidell L. S., eds.), Harper Collins, New York, 1996.
35. Mokhtarian P. L., and Meenakshisundaram R. Beyond Telesubstitution: Disaggregate Longitudinal Structural Equations Modeling of Communication Impacts. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1999, pp. 33–52.
36. Srinivasan K. K., and Athuru S. R. Modeling the Interaction Between Internet Communication and Travel Activities: Evidence from Bay Area, California, Travel Survey 2000. In Transportation Research Records: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2004, pp. 230–240.
37. Carrasco J. A., and Miller E. J. Exploring the Propensity to Perform Social Activities: Social Network Approach. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 22
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 2
- A comparative study of social interaction frequencies among social net...
- Exploring the Role of Social Interactions and Supports in Overcoming A...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
