Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Evaluation of Signs and Markings for Partial Continuous Flow Intersection

Abstract

The continuous flow intersection (CFI) supports high traffic flow where there is a large volume of left turns. The CFI accomplishes this by moving left-turning traffic to the left side of a highway before the main intersection. Left turns can then be made at the same time as the opposing through movement. This eliminates the need for separate left turn signal phasing and reduces the potential conflict points between left-turning and through traffic. Because CFI left turn movements begin well in advance of the road junction, signing and marking requirements are different from those for conventional intersections. This study reports the results of a driving simulator study that compared alternative signing and marking options. Three strategies for navigation signing in advance of the crossover were evaluated: overhead signing and two different ground-mounted sign alternatives. In addition, on a leg of the CFI that did not cross left-turning traffic to the left side of the roadway, alternative schemes for emphasizing the location of the stop line were evaluated. The results showed that the ground-mounted navigation signing treatment that included a “Keep Left” advance sign was as effective as an overhead navigation sign. All treatments for designating the stop line were equally effective.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Reid J. D., and Hummer J. E. Travel Time Comparisons Between Seven Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 56–66.
2. Chick M. J. The Displaced Right Turn Junction. Thesis. University of Leeds, United Kingdom, 2001.
3. El Esawey M., and Sayed T. Comparison of Two Unconventional Intersection Schemes: Crossover Displaced Left-Turn and Upstream Signalized Crossover Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2023, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 10–19.
4. Jagannathan R. Evaluation of Crossover Displaced Left-turn (XDL) Intersections and Real-Time Signal Control Strategies with Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Falls Church, Va., 2003.
5. Simodynes T., Welch T., and Kuntemeyer M. Effects of Reducing Conflict Points on Reducing Accidents (abstract only). Presented at 3rd National Access Management Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1998, p. 141.
6. Dadic I., Badanjak D., Scukanec A., and Brlek P. Dependence of Conflict Intensity Between Traffic Flows and Traffic Safety. Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden, 2000, pp. 217–226.
7. Hydén C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1987.
8. Gettman D., and Head L. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
9. Davis G. A., Hourdos J., and Xiong H. Outline of Causal Theory of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
10. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways— 2003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vaughan W. Inman
SAIC, 6300 Georgetown Pike, F-215, McLean, VA 22101.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 65

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 19

  1. Evaluation and Analysis of CFI Schemes with Different Length of Displa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Signal control method and performance evaluation of an improved displa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. An innovative design for left turn bicycles at continuous flow interse...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Delay Estimation and Application Conditions of Two-Legged Continuous F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Pedestrian Delay Model for Continuous Flow Intersections under Three D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Analysis of saturation flow rate at tandem intersections using field d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A case study of a continuous flow intersection and its impact on publi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Impact of in-vehicle navigation information on lane-change behavior in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Safety evaluation of intersections with dynamic use of exit-lanes for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Operational Efficiency Evaluation of Intersections with Dynamic Lane A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Optimization model for layout and signal design of full continuous flo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Optimal operation of displaced left-turn intersections: A lane-based a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Driving simulator evaluation of drivers’ response to intersections wit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Development of Planning-Stage Models for Analyzing Continuous Flow Int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Analysis of unconventional arterial intersection designs (UAIDs): stat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Barriers to Implementation of Unconventional Intersection Designs...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Using cognitive work analysis and the strategies analysis diagram to u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Coordinated Optimization Model for Signal Timings of Full Continuous F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Coordinated Optimization Model for Signal Timings of Full Continuous F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub