Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2009

Pilot Model for Estimating Pedestrian Intersection Crossing Volumes

Abstract

Better data on pedestrian volumes are needed to improve the safety, comfort, and convenience of pedestrian movement. This data collection requires more carefully developed methodologies for counting pedestrians as well as improved methods of modeling pedestrian volumes. The methodology used to create a simple pilot model of pedestrian intersection crossing volumes in Alameda County, California, is described. The model is based on weekly pedestrian volumes at a sample of 50 intersections with a wide variety of surrounding land uses, transportation system attributes, and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics. Three alternative model structures were considered, and the final recommended model has a good overall fit (adjusted R2 = .897). Statistically significant factors in the model include the total population within a 0.5-mi radius, number of jobs within a 0.25-mi radius, number of commercial retail properties within a 0.25-mi radius, and the presence of a regional transit station within a 0.1-mi radius of an intersection. The model has a simple structure, and it can be implemented by practitioners using geographic information systems and a basic spreadsheet program. Because the study is based on a relatively small number of intersections in one urban area, additional research is needed to refine the model and determine its applicability in other areas.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Turner S., Shunk G., and Hottenstein A. Development of a Methodology to Estimate Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Demand. Research Project Number 0-1723, Report 1723-S. Texas Transportation Institute; Texas Department of Transportation; FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 1998.
2. Ercolano J. M., Olson J. S., and Spring D. M. Sketch-Plan Method for Estimating Pedestrian Traffic for Central Business Districts and Suburban Growth Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 38–47.
3. Landis B. W. The Bicycle System Performance Measures: The Intersection Hazard and Latent Demand Score Models. ITE Journal, Vol. 66, No. 2, 1996, pp. 18–26.
4. Portland Pedestrian Master Plan. Office of Transportation Engineering and Development, City of Portland, Ore., June 1998.
5. District of Columbia Pedestrian Master Plan. District of Columbia Department of Transportation, 2008.
6. Alexandria Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Plan. City of Alexandria, Va., June 2008. http://alexandriava.gov/localmotion/info/default.aspx?id=11418.
7. Purvis C. Incorporating Land Use and Accessibility Variables in Travel Demand Models. Presented at ASCE Specialty Conference on Transportation, Lane Use, and Air Quality, Portland, Ore., 1998. www.mtc.ca.gov/maps_and_data/datamart/research/ascepurv.htm.
8. Purvis C. Incorporating Effects of Smart Growth and Transit-Oriented Development in San Francisco Bay Area Travel Demand Models: Current and Future Strategies. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 2003. www.mtc.ca.gov/maps_and_data/datamart/research/Incorporating_Smart_Growth_MTC_models.pdf.
9. 1000 Friends of Oregon. LUTRAQ: Making the Land Use Transportation Air Quality Connection, Vol. 4A: The Pedestrian Environment. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.; Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; Calthorpe Associates, Dec. 1993. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/tped.html.
10. Clifton K. J., Burnier C. V., Huang S., Kang M. W., and Schneider R. A Meso-Scale Model of Pedestrian Demand. Presented at Fourth Joint Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning and the Association of European Schools of Planning, Chicago, Ill., July 6–11, 2008.
11. Zupan J. M., and Pushkarev B. Pedestrian Travel Demand. In Highway Research Record 355, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 37–53.
12. Benham J., and Patel B. G. A Method for Estimating Pedestrian Volume in a Central Business District. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 22–26.
13. Raford N., and Ragland D. Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 66–74.
14. Raford N., and Ragland D. Pedestrian Volume Modeling for Traffic Safety and Exposure Analysis. Traffic Safety Center White Paper. University of California, Berkeley, Dec. 2005. http://repositories.cdlib.org/its/tsc/UCB-TSC-RR-2005-TRB2.
15. Desyllas J., Duxbury E., Ward J., and Smith A. Pedestrian Demand Modelling of Large Cities: An Applied Example from London. Center for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, June 2003. www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper62.pdf.
16. Intelligent Space Partnership. Fathom: Visibility Graph Analysis Software. www.intelligentspace.com/tech/fathom.htm. Accessed July 15, 2008.
17. Pulugurtha S. S., and Repaka S. R. Assessment of Models to Measure Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 39–48.
18. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–113.
19. Handy S. Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships Among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005. http://trb.org/downloads/sr282papers/sr282Handy.pdf.
20. Krizek K. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, 2003, pp. 270–287.
21. Shriver K. Influence of Environmental Design on Pedestrian Travel Behavior in Four Austin Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 64–75.
22. Cameron R. M. Pedestrian Volume Characteristics. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 47, No. 1, Jan. 1977, pp. 36–37.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. 2007 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. 2007.
24. Davis S. E., King L. E., and Robertson D. H. Predicting Pedestrian Crosswalk Volumes. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 25–30.
25. Zeeger C. V., Stewart R., Huang H., Lagerwey P. A., Feaganes J., and Campbell B. J. Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. Report FHWA–HRT–04–100. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
26. Hocherman I., Hakkert A. S., and Bar-Ziv J. Estimating the Daily Volume of Crossing Pedestrians from Short-Counts. In Transportation Research Record 1168, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 31–38.
27. Greene-Roesel R., Diógenes M. C., Ragland D. R., and Lindau L. A. Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts. Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2007. www.tsc.berkeley.edu/news/08-0503session240ryanposter.pdf.
28. Schneider R. J., Arnold L. S., and Ragland D. R. Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections: Use of Automated Counters to Extrapolate Weekly Volumes from Short Manual Counts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 1–12.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2009
Issue published: January 2009

Rights and permissions

© 2009 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Robert J. Schneider
Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2614 Dwight Way #7374, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Lindsay S. Arnold
Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2614 Dwight Way #7374, Berkeley, CA 94720.
David R. Ragland
Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2614 Dwight Way #7374, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 195

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 64

  1. Yaya yolculuk taleplerinin mahalle karakteristiklerine dayalı tahmini
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. MoPeD meets MITO: a hybrid modeling framework for pedestrian travel de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Modeling Trip Distribution Using Mobile Phone CDR Data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Pedestrian safety at intersections near light rail transit stations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A critical review on pedestrian crossing behaviour and pedestrian-vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Safety of walking trips accessing to public transportation: A Bayesian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Pedestrian crossing volume estimation at signalized intersections usin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An integrated text mining, literature review, and meta-analysis approa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Pedestrian volume prediction with high spatiotemporal granularity in u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A data model for pedestrian routes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Analysing the relationship between POI density and stimulus complexity...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. An integrated clustering and copula-based model to assess the impact o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Vulnerable road users’ crash hotspot identification on multi-lane arte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Spatiotemporal exploration of Melbourne pedestrian demand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Development and Validation of a Seven-County Regional Pedestrian Volum...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Enhancing non-motorist safety by simulating trip exposure using a tran...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedest...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Evaluation of the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s bike a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Real-time estimation of pedestrian volume at button-activated midblock...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Dynamic bike sharing traffic prediction using spatiotemporal pattern d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Steps Towards Sustainability: Assessment of Walkability of Streets in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Real-time prediction of public bike sharing system demand using genera...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Hyper-local Urban Contextual Awareness through Open Data Integration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The Impact of PM10 Levels on Pedestrian Volume: Findings from Streets ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Midblock Pedestrian Crash Predictions in a Systemic, Risk-Based Pedest...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Trip Distribution Modeling Using Mobile Phone Data: Emphasis on Intra-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Identifying High-Risk Intersections for Walking and Bicycling Using Mu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Safety in Numbers for Bicyclists at Urban Intersections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. A Pedestrian Exposure Model for the California State Highway System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Programs: Scan of Current U.S. Practice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Quantifying place: Analyzing the drivers of pedestrian activity in den...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Bicycle, pedestrian, and mixed-mode trail traffic: A performance asses...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Adding temporal information to direct-demand models: Hourly estimation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Latent analysis of Complete Streets and traffic safety along an urban ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Spatial models of active travel in small communities: Merging the goal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Analyzing the Drivers of Pedestrian Activity at High Spatial Resolutio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Spatial variations in active mode trip volume at intersections: a loca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Real-Time Traffic Flow Management Based on Inter-Object Communication:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Ballpark Method for Estimating Pedestrian and Bicyclist Exposure in Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Up on The 606...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Data Analytics for Safety Applications
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Development of destination choice models for pedestrian travel
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Representing pedestrian activity in travel demand models: Framework an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Integrated Optimization and Simulation Framework for Large-Scale Crowd...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Facility-Demand Models of Peak Period Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Monitoring and Modeling of Urban Trail Traffic: Validation of Direct D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Developing crash modification functions for pedestrian signal improvem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. ‘Big data’ for pedestrian volume: Exploring the use of Google Street V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Differences in Pedestrian Profile Pattern During Weekdays and Weekends...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Investigating the associations between road network structure and non-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Assessing Pedestrian Profile According to Age and Gender in Central Bu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Estimating Mixed-Mode Urban Trail Traffic Using Negative Binomial Regr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Designing and Implementing a Regional Active Transportation Monitoring...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  54. Comparison of pedestrian trip generation models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Evolving ITE Trip Generation Handbook...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Evaluation of Pedestrian Safety...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Do All Roadway Users Want the Same Things?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Development and Application of Volume Model for Pedestrian Intersectio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Modeling of Pedestrian Activity at Signalized Intersections: Land Use,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Association between Roadway Intersection Characteristics and Pedestria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub